User talk:WikiSceptic
|
This user has had enough of the insolence, arrogance, ignorance and gross stupidity of Wikipedian bureaucrazy, and has opted out. He has deleted most, if not all of his user page and his personal pages, but his talk page is being forcibly retained in the typical exercise of Wikipedian arrogance and insolence. Please do not leave any messages here, as this user will not visit here any more. |
|
|---|
| 1 2 |
Obrigado[edit]
Thank you for helping me on my article at Confederation of the Equator. I also hope to edit for the Portuguese Wikipedia some day. (I also LOVE the language of saudade)
- That's fine. I am trying my best to be of par here at Wikipedia, so hope my article was good, in spite of the errors I made. Also, I hope to be able to be considered an "exception newcomer" or something like that by the general community. OMEN 05:13, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the star...
From: Novo-rei, NOVO-REI 02:54, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
210.211.142.17[edit]
Hello - I agree that 210.211.142.17 has been engaging in spam vandalism. However, I'm not an admin and cannot block him/her myself. Also, his last edit was 4 days ago. Generally admins don't block a user when their last vandalism was more than a few hours prior. I recommend keeping an eye on this user's edits. If you notice him spamming, leave him another final message ({{spam4}}) on his talk page. If he continues to spam soon thereafter, report him here: Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. I know leaving another "final4 message" may seem redundant since he/she already has one on the talk page, but leaving another one shows the blocking admin that the user has seen a warning recently.
I hope this information helps. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns --AbsolutDan (talk) 04:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Civility[edit]
Please refrain from winding people up on talk pages, as you did here. Thankyou. Blnguyen | rant-line 06:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
OK, I've reviewed your past history and it doesn't look good and seems to have occurred before, and you have been around for a long time so you should know better. So I have handed you a 10 day block. Blnguyen | rant-line 07:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk page blanking[edit]
You cannot blank your own talk page. It serves as a record of your actions and must be kept. Ryūlóng 05:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- If you want out, then stop editting. Ryūlóng 05:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- If you seriously do not want to be an editor of Wikipedia, then just leave. Never sign back in. Just do not blank your own talk page. There are problems with that. Ryūlóng 05:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- And your subpages can be deleted by tagging them with {{db-user}} which I did for that one page that you did blank. Ryūlóng 05:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
| “ | When I delete my pages because I want out, can you stop your pompous self-important meddling in my affairs? I am not deleting other people's pages, but my own. You got a problem? Can't mind your own business? WikiSceptic 05:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh, really? And why is that? If I want out of Wikipedia, I cannot? And, apparently, that also goes for my original pages created as subsidiaries to my talk page? Wow, this is fantastic! Has Hitler come back to life? Or is it Stalin? WikiSceptic 05:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I have had enough of the criminal insolence and arrogance of you lot. Nguyen was not the first, and you will certainly not be the last. It is my right to remove my personal pages, and in preventing that, you tresspass on my rights. This, in civil law; I do not care for Wikipedia's internal rules. I not only want out of Wikipedia, I also want my personal pages out, and that is my right. I am not asking for any charity or privileges but to mind my own business. Please stop meddling in my affairs - although, from my long experience, I know that you will not cease your present outrageous encroachments on my rights. WikiSceptic 05:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
” |
I'm copying this over here for a reason. There is nothing "criminal" about what Wikipedia, its administration, and its users are doing to you. What you are doing is against our rules at Wikipedia. These pages are not yours. They are Wikipedia's. This includes this page, a User talk page. No one is encroaching on your rights. We are not a part of the US government, so free speech does not cover Wikipedia. Wikipedia has the right to remove and keep what it wants. And your user talk page is under this. Ryūlóng 05:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, you are wrong. And if you are seeking to file legal charges against Wikipedia, you'll find yourself unable to edit anymore. Ryūlóng 05:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Your dispute[edit]
My suggestion is that you reread the terms and conditions of use and Wikipedia:Copyright. Ryulong is correct here. I'm sorry you've had such a difficult time, but Ryulong is only enforcing the rules of Wikipedia, as is the prerogative of any editor, especially those who patrol for vandalism. You are not being targeted by anyone, only being expected to abide by the terms and conditions of use to which you agreed by editing on Wikipedia. --Chuchunezumi 06:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Joseph rene vilatte.gif[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Joseph rene vilatte.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 07:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Pierina da Silva[edit]
A tag has been placed on Pierina da Silva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RavichandarMy coffee shop 13:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
The article Narayan Waman Tilak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No reference does not meet WP:bio
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Linguisticgeek (talk) 15:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs[edit]
Hello WikiSceptic! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Geert Jan Stuyver - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Francesco Ricossa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability; only a very few google hits, and a couple of minor quotes showing up in google news archives.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TallNapoleon (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Geert Jan Stuyver for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geert Jan Stuyver is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geert Jan Stuyver until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The-Pope (talk) 13:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cheers AKS 08:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Navin Hiranandani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navin Hiranandani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cheers AKS 07:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of William J. Morgan (Sedevacantist)[edit]
The article William J. Morgan (Sedevacantist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:09, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dharmadhyaksha/Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani[edit]
A tag has been placed on User:Dharmadhyaksha/Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
"Catholic Resistance" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Catholic Resistance and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Catholic Resistance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)