User talk:Wlad2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wlad2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Go Phightins! (talk) 22:08, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Plagiarism in the scientific Journal Nature[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Plagiarism in the scientific Journal Nature, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Go Phightins! (talk) 22:08, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Plagiarism in the scientific Journal Nature[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Plagiarism in the scientific Journal Nature, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3402. As a copyright violation, Plagiarism in the scientific Journal Nature appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Plagiarism in the scientific Journal Nature has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 23:23, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that assertion of authorship or permission is not sufficient; it is essential to use one of the methods described at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
You would be wasting your time to do that, because this material is in any case unsuitable. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a noticeboard, and in particular is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda or for any kind of campaign. JohnCD (talk) 23:30, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have deleted the article and reverted the physics portal edit: Wikipedia isn't a soapbox for your dispute with Nature. Acroterion (talk) 03:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Journal Nature plagiarizes Wikipedia[edit]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Take your gripe elsewhere[edit]

If you have a gripe with the editors of the journal Nature, please take it up with them. Wikipedia is not your personal soapbox to air your gripes. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Atomic nucleus[edit]

Dear Wlad2000, please stop posting whole e-mail conversations on the page Atomic nucleus. This is an encyclopedic article about the nucleus, not a collection of e-mails written about that topic. Furthermore, publishing other people's e-mails without their explicit consent is at least a violation of copyright laws, if not a more serious legal issue. If there is a dispute about what content should be included in the article and which sources can be used to back that up, please use the articles talk page to discuss it and reach consensus with the other editors, not the article page itself. You might also want to have a look at WP:EDITWAR and WP:COI, just so you can avoid crossing any lines that you might not be aware of. Thanks! — HHHIPPO 07:13, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 11:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have blocked this account because you are abusing the encyclopedia to further an off-wiki dispute between yourself and a third party. Wikipedia is not an appropriate place to debate or promote your case. We take no position on the dispute itself, for that is not the role of this or any encyclopedia, and have no opinion on the issue, but it is clear that you are editing articles with an intent to make a case on your behalf, which is not acceptable. As has been pointed out above, placing personal emails into an encyclopedia article is wholly unacceptable: it is at least a serious copyright violation, and is a breach of personal confidences. If this activity resumes after the expiration of the block, the block will be reinstated indefinitely. Acroterion (talk) 11:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wlad2000&oldid=1079455427"