Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 7 May 9 >

May 8[edit]

Template:Infobox judo competition event[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WPRe[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and appears to be duplicated by many other templates that exist. Izno (talk) 19:08, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Pan American Games[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Noida Metro color and related rail templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles and templates have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Noida Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Delhi Metro right/Green and related rail templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, except in a few old user drafts and sandboxes that should fail relatively gracefully when these templates are deleted. All relevant articles and templates have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Delhi Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 NISA standings[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; Seems to be replaced by the usage of Template:2022 NISA East standings and Template:2022 NISA West standings. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - initially, they were supposed to have combined standings, but they got split into divisions. This can be deleted. Cristane (talk) 22:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dinos de Saltillo roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant as Dinos de Saltillo already has the roster and staff in table form as part of the article with the same information. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 Asian Wrestling Championships[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No links. All were deleted in an Afd on April 29. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UserFacts[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used on about 60 pages, doesn't seem to have wide uptake and doesn't seem to be a generally useful template, with some odd selections about what should be of interest to a 'user profile'. Izno (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. Just did a test preview with this. The only thing I find useful in part is seeing your first edit. But it's very outdated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/SSR left/Western and related rail templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Sabah State Railway. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021 India 2021 FIBA Asia Cup qualification team roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on one page, with no clear uses elsewhere - considering the lack of notoriety of most of the players involved in these qualifiers, I don't think there's much justification for another page with all rosters from the qualifiers. This could easily be subst-ed on the one page it's used on and deleted. fuzzy510 (talk) 13:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Olympics on NBC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two of the three links just redirect to the parent article. Even if they didn't, this would still fail WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:49, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Douro-class destroyer[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 05:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two links outside of the title and one redirect. The rest are red. No navigational benefit. The list of ships on this navbox are already featured on Douro-class destroyer. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:43, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two links to Douro-class ships, plus in the lower section of the template two links to other related articles (the preceding class of ships and another ship) and a link to a class of ships in the Columbian navy - that's five other than the article title. We aren't including the links in the navbox to the Columbian Navy and Portuguese Navy for some reason? GraemeLeggett (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WCM needs to familiarize themself with WP:NOTFINISHED and WP:REDLINKS. Parsecboy (talk) 09:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You dismiss NENAN and yet cite two eassay's which are not policy either. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
REDLINKS is an editing guideline, and as such carries far more weight than NENAN (or NOTFINISHED) in that it represents community consensus, rather than the opinion of one or a few editors. Parsecboy (talk) 19:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep For all the reasons expressed about his earlier ship navbox noms.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per GraemeLeggett, Parsexboy and Sturmvogel 66. I don't see the benefit to this effort, it's becoming net-negative. - wolf 14:49, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, I don't see why there's a claim of "no navigational benefit" when this is providing a navigational benefit between multiple ship articles and the class article. Are we going to start deleting templates such as Template:Campaignbox Prairie Grove Campaign because the campaign didn't include enough major events to reach an arbitrary treshhold. WCM, this is becoming disruptive. Hog Farm Talk 20:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hindu temples in Penang[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Hindu temples in Malaysia. Izno (talk) 05:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:Hindu temples in Malaysia. All links are already on the main Malaysia templae. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_May_8&oldid=1088070370"