Dariusz Jemielniak (Pundit), chair of the FDC, Wikimedia steward, and an editor on the Polish Wikipedia.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Funds Dissemination Committee has published its recommendations for the inaugural round 1 of funding. Requests totaled US$10.4M, nearly all of the FDC's budget for both first and second rounds. The seven-member committee of community volunteers appointed in September advises the WMF board on the distribution of grant funds among applying Wikimedia organizations. The FDC is a key component of the WMF's financial reforms to improve transparency and accountability among the chapters—national entities that handle considerable flows of donors' money through the annual Wikipedia fundraiser and from other sources. The committee, which has a separate operating budget of $276k for salaries and expenses, considered 12 applications for funds, from 11 chapters and from the WMF itself for its non-core activities. The decision-making process included community and FDC staff input after October 1, the closing date for submissions.
In a four-day in-person session in San Francisco on October 28–31, the committee analyzed the proposals, considered the staff assessments, and finalized how much funding it would recommend the Board of Trustees allocate to each applicant (see graph below). The volunteers decided to endorse an average of 81% of the funding sought—a total of $8.43M, which went to 11 of the 12 applicants. This leaves $2.71M to be distributed in round 2, for which applications are due in little more than three months' time.
How the numbers play out
The committee recommended that five chapters and the WMF should be granted the full funding for which they had applied: Wikimedia Germany—which had requested the highest amount among the chapters of $1.79M—and the chapters in Sweden ($341k), Argentina ($146k), Israel ($141k), Hungary ($67k), and the WMF itself ($4.46M). The exception was that fees for the planned Wikimedia Chapters Association were removed from grants where they had been included in application budgets.
The axe came out for at least three chapters' applications, which were severely cut back. WMUK's proposals, amounting to $919k, were met with FDC recommendations of $536k (58% of the requested funds). The committee expressed "significant concerns" over the chapter's current governance challenges and recommended that it focus on resolving that issue before returning to a higher growth rate.
Wikimedia France requested $961k, but this was slashed by more than 90%—close to $900k—due to the FDC's lack of confidence in the organization's current capabilities to execute its proposed annual plan. The committee recommended that WMFR re-evaluate its plan and seek essential bridge funding to carry it over until the second-round recommendations by April 15 and the Board of Trustees' decision by May 15 (both proposed deadlines).
The committee rejected the application for $291k by Wikimedia Australia—currently in the throes of a fractious election campaign. Concerns were expressed over alignment, metrics, and some compliance issues, although the chapter was praised for its "pioneering" GLAM work. The FDC will recommend that the WMF board make an exception to the rules so that both Australia and France may re-apply in round 2 if they wish.
While Switzerland's programs were acknowledged as "laudable", the FDC said the organization might overreach itself on its growth path and recommended only $362K of the $560K requested (64%). Requested budgets by Austria (91%—"costing issues") and the Netherlands (74%—"staffing issues") were also reduced.
The removal of requested contributions by participating chapters to the Wikimedia Chapters Association was justified by the committee by pointing out that the entity is not yet legally in existence, and is still just in a planning stage. The FDC commented that the WCA, once established, might be considered as eligible to apply for FDC funds and that chapters are free to allocate WCA funds as they see fit from their given budgets.
The WMF board is looking at the recommendations, appeals, and comments made on the discussion page. The final decision by the trustees is set to be published on December 15. The second round for this financial year starts on March 1. Wikimedia communities will elect two additional voting FDC members in June.
Discussion of related issues
The FDC's role in trying to raise standards of governance and accountability in the Wikimedia movement are already becoming evident. The committee has conveyed the gist of its discussions surrounding such issues as:
the need "to explore in greater depth the kind of growth trajectories that are suitable" for entities of vastly different size and growth stages—in particular, "what kinds of models of staff/volunteer organisations are most appropriate for high-impact work in our movement";
the fact that some entities during the round were in "situations of transition or crisis, mainly for internal leadership or governance reasons";
the need "to learn from the different models of leadership and governance, and share both successes and challenges";
the need "for a movement-wide discussion on 'impact' and 'innovation', and what [the] appropriate metrics, benchmarks and learning systems for these might be", with criticism of the lack of depth and detail in outcome and impact indicators;
the possible need for more discussion in the movement on chapters' roles in "editor recruitment and membership development";
how best to support entities that experience challenging situations in executing annual plans; and
the committee's favourable reaction to proposals that explicitly engaged with "increasing the diversity of the communities they serve, including programs to recruit more women editors".
Requests (red) and recommendations (green) in millions of US dollars (percentages of the original request are in parentheses). The foundation's $4.5M request, recommended in full, is excluded for easier scaling.
JSTOR-accounts for Wikipedians: On November 19, the WMF confirmed in its blog that the long sought after 100 JSTOR-accounts as a pilot program are being made available. More than 200 editors already have applied for access at the initiative's portal.
Option #37, the winner of the first round of voting for Wikivoyage's new logo. Variations on #37 are now requested as the second round of voting begins.
Travel sister-project legal dispute, new logo: On November 19, one of the two legal disputes concerning the launch preparations of the foundation's new Wikivoyage travel guide ended as the court dismissed Internet Brands' case against two Wikimedia volunteers. It saw no basis for federal jurisdiction over the case after the plaintiff retreated on its claims under the US Lanham act. The other case, in the State of California, is ongoing. In related news, the results of the vote to choose Wikivoyage's logo have been published on Meta. A second vote will decide on the actual design and colors.
Annual fundraiser launched: On November 13, the annual Wikimedia fundraiser across WMF-hosted projects started with the launch in Germany, where the local chapter processes received donations. The global campaign is due to start shortly; test results of the preparations, and additional information, are at the Meta portal.
English Wikipedia ArbCom elections: At the time of publication, nominations for this year's English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) elections have closed. Twenty-one candidates have stepped forward for the eight vacancies, which will all be for two-year terms (current or previous arbitrators are in italics): Beeblebrox, Carcharoth, Coren, Count Iblis, David Fuchs, Elen of the Roads, Guerillero, Jc37, Jclemens, Keilana, Ks0stm, Kww, Newyorkbrad, NuclearWarfare, Pgallert, RegentsPark, Richwales, Salvio giuliano, Timotheus Canens, Worm That Turned, and YOLO Swag. Each candidate statement contains links to pages for questions and discussion. The committee will comprise 15 members after the election as decided in a community RfC last month.
Two Wikipedians in residence for Africa sought: WikiAfrica, the collaborative project between the Africa Centre and the Italian NPO Lettera27, has published a call for applications to fill two Wikipedian in residence positions.