User talk:Christine Wendeburg-Schaper

Hello, Miss Wendeburg-Schaper

-) Christine Wendeburg-Schaper (talk) 22:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Wendeburg-Schaper, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Christine Wendeburg-Schaper! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SPI notification

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maltin Kant. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ezidxan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the strong suspicion of socking, you're making non-neutral edits, rattling them off with a brand-new account. Ian.thomson, you can mark this one as blocked on the SPI. Drmies (talk) 17:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]