User talk:Wasim akram beldanga

October 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ready (2011 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 07:19, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Wasim akram beldanga, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 07:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

October 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wasim Akram was changed by Wasim akram beldanga (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922151 on 2012-10-25T09:08:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:08, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wasim Akram, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:10, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm Titodutta. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tito Dutta (talk) 08:02, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Khokababu. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tito Dutta (talk) 08:04, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Challenge 2, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tito Dutta (talk) 07:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:50, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]