Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

5 August 2024

18 June 2024

15 June 2024

25 May 2024

2 May 2024

22 April 2024

2 April 2024

13 March 2024

21 February 2024

31 January 2024

13 January 2024

  • curprev 19:4519:45, 13 January 2024Chris troutman talk contribs 20,012 bytes +15 Undid revision 1195381475 by Rjjiii (talk) No, articles still have to meet policies. The linked discussion wasn't a community RfC nor did it come up with that result. Your editing is sloppy, if not dishonest. Tag: Undo
  • curprev 16:3016:30, 13 January 2024Rjjiii talk contribs 19,997 bytes −15 Per talk, this more closely reflects practice and the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_criteria/Archive_3#Notability_missing_from_GA_criteria ("Notability is handled at AFD or in other venues."; "if you get a GAN that you think is non-notable, but find it has survived AFD in the last few months (and stable since), you should respect that decision and review the GAN without that concern"; "nominate it for deletion, and add a note to the GAN template") Tag: Reverted

3 December 2023

2 December 2023

23 November 2023

22 November 2023

26 August 2023

24 August 2023

31 July 2023

30 July 2023

26 July 2023

24 May 2023

9 May 2023

28 April 2023

14 April 2023

6 April 2023

3 April 2023

30 March 2023

26 February 2023

13 February 2023

8 February 2023

27 January 2023

20 January 2023

19 January 2023

16 January 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)