Joe Volpe: Revision history

10 September 2007

• curprev 01:2301:23, 10 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,754 bytes −941‎ In case you haven't noticed, GD, I *don't* want the paragraph erased. I simply believe that the original version contains far too much detail. undo

9 September 2007

• curprev 22:5022:50, 9 September 2007‎ Gilliam talk contribs‎ m 53,695 bytes +2‎ Reverted edits by 172.130.104.14 (talk) to last version by Joshuapaquin undo
• curprev 22:2322:23, 9 September 2007‎ 172.130.104.14 talk‎ 53,693 bytes −2‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 21:2721:27, 9 September 2007‎ Joshuapaquin talk contribs‎ m 53,695 bytes −3‎ Reverted 1 edit by 172.130.104.164 identified as vandalism to last revision by Sarcasticidealist. using TW undo
• curprev 21:1921:19, 9 September 2007‎ 172.130.104.164 talk‎ 53,698 bytes +3‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 16:5116:51, 9 September 2007‎ Steve Smith talk contribs‎ 53,695 bytes −17‎ Undid revision 156731238 by 172.132.4.146 (talk) vandalism undo
• curprev 16:4316:43, 9 September 2007‎ 172.132.4.146 talk‎ 53,712 bytes +17‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:4614:46, 9 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,695 bytes +941‎ no one was involved with the article for nine months, but its pretty sad to see CJCurrie using the POV tag just over one paragrah he wants erased undo

8 September 2007

• curprev 17:5717:57, 8 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ m 52,754 bytes +1‎ →‎Early political career undo
• curprev 17:5617:56, 8 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,753 bytes +68‎ →‎Early political career undo
• curprev 17:5017:50, 8 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,685 bytes −1,033‎ Readers should note that GoldDragon did raise any objections to the NPOV tag during the last nine months. Readers should also note that GoldDragon is now rejecting his own compromise wording. undo
• curprev 15:4815:48, 8 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,718 bytes −10‎ made cabinet a top tier header undo
• curprev 15:4515:45, 8 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ m 53,728 bytes +46‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 04:3404:34, 8 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,682 bytes +206‎ this is awkward undo
• curprev 03:5703:57, 8 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,476 bytes +791‎ this is coming from someone who uses double standards; there is not justification for the NPOV tag except for CJCurrie attempting to disrupt undo
• curprev 02:4602:46, 8 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,685 bytes −791‎ GoldDragon, please review WP:POINT. Removing this page's NPOV notice because you want a notice added to the Norman Gardner page is not acceptable. As I recall, no one agreed with you re: Gardner undo

7 September 2007

• curprev 21:3821:38, 7 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,476 bytes +791‎ Going thru the article history, there have already been enough concessions made, and I don't see CJCurrie applying the same standard to Norm Gardner undo
• curprev 18:0818:08, 7 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,685 bytes −787‎ I don't think you've quite grasped my point. I've restored my version, *and* added an NPOV tag with reference to your objections. Please don't remove it. undo
• curprev 16:4716:47, 7 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ m 53,472 bytes +17‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 16:4116:41, 7 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,455 bytes +770‎ just because you can't have your way, an NPOV tag is not justified undo

6 September 2007

• curprev 21:2621:26, 6 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,685 bytes −756‎ Really? What has changed between then and now, pray tell? (Pending your answer, I've restored my version and added an NPOV notice.) undo
• curprev 17:2017:20, 6 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ m 53,441 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 17:1417:14, 6 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,440 bytes +765‎ what is fine back then is not necessarily fine now undo

5 September 2007

• curprev 20:4220:42, 5 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,675 bytes −765‎ We've now reached a situation where GoldDragon is rejecting his own compromise version. I'll let other editors determine if this is "reasonable behaviour" or not. undo
• curprev 16:4716:47, 5 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,440 bytes +765‎ upon a more careful inspection, this needs more detail, the type of detail that CJCurrie initially put in the original version undo

4 September 2007

• curprev 21:3921:39, 4 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,675 bytes −2,025‎ I'm now using the *exact* wording that GoldDragon recommended on the talk page, several months ago. I presume this will be acceptable. undo
• curprev 17:1617:16, 4 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 54,700 bytes +1,996‎ the old wording is awkward, but the new wording is far too short and omits salient details undo

3 September 2007

• curprev 23:5723:57, 3 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,704 bytes −831‎ GoldDragon: I'm using *your* wording from the talk page. The only change is that I've taken the middle sentence to footnotes. (I'd be willing to include it in parantheses, if you wish.) undo
• curprev 23:2223:22, 3 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,535 bytes +831‎ still haven't come to a conclusion on the Career foundation yet undo
• curprev 22:5122:51, 3 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,704 bytes +15‎ →‎Fine and appeal undo
• curprev 22:5022:50, 3 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 52,689 bytes −816‎ →‎Other controversies: This paragraph was the only reason the NPOV tag was still in place. If GoldDragon is fine with this wording, I think the controversy is at an end. undo
• curprev 22:4722:47, 3 September 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 53,505 bytes −30‎ I should give GoldDragon credit where it's due; the rewritten section on Apotex is actually quite balanced. This, however ... undo
• curprev 16:4016:40, 3 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,535 bytes −88‎ simpler undo

2 September 2007

• curprev 17:4717:47, 2 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,623 bytes +96‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 15:0215:02, 2 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,527 bytes +18‎ no NPOV tag is needed, unless Norm Gardner gets one too undo
• curprev 14:5514:55, 2 September 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,509 bytes +316‎ this is more specific to what the article really said undo

20 August 2007

• curprev 18:0718:07, 20 August 2007‎ Mindmatrix talk contribs‎ m 53,193 bytes +22‎ dab to Stoney Creek, Ontario undo

15 August 2007

• curprev 23:1323:13, 15 August 2007‎ Ground Zero talk contribs‎ m 53,171 bytes −2‎ Reverted edits by 172.130.203.66 (talk) to last version by Que-Can undo
• curprev 23:0323:03, 15 August 2007‎ 172.130.203.66 talk‎ 53,173 bytes +2‎ No edit summary undo

29 June 2007

• curprev 13:5413:54, 29 June 2007‎ Que-Can talk contribs‎ 53,171 bytes +12‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 09:3209:32, 29 June 2007‎ Earl Andrew talk contribs‎ 53,159 bytes +17‎ No edit summary undo

7 May 2007

• curprev 01:4601:46, 7 May 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ m 53,142 bytes +209‎ Reverted edits by 99.245.162.94 (talk) to last version by CJCurrie undo
• curprev 01:4401:44, 7 May 2007‎ 99.245.162.94 talk‎ 52,933 bytes −209‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 01:3801:38, 7 May 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ m 53,142 bytes +209‎ Reverted edits by 99.245.162.94 (talk) to last version by CJCurrie undo

6 May 2007

• curprev 20:3220:32, 6 May 2007‎ 99.245.162.94 talk‎ 52,933 bytes −209‎ No edit summary undo

2 April 2007

• curprev 01:2801:28, 2 April 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 53,142 bytes +1,793‎ my apologies; I didn't see the other comments undo

1 April 2007

• curprev 23:3823:38, 1 April 2007‎ CJCurrie talk contribs‎ 51,349 bytes −1,793‎ For the love of ... GoldDragon: You're outvoted on this matter. Please don't restore this section again unless this situation changes. undo

31 March 2007

• curprev 13:5113:51, 31 March 2007‎ GoldDragon talk contribs‎ 53,142 bytes +1,793‎ do not agree undo

28 March 2007

• curprev 11:0611:06, 28 March 2007‎ Ground Zero talk contribs‎ 51,349 bytes −1,793‎ →‎Other controversies: remove per talk undo

23 March 2007

• curprev 23:4223:42, 23 March 2007‎ 74.101.92.199 talk‎ 53,142 bytes +72‎ →‎Results undo