Jump to content

Kalwar (caste): Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

15 July 2024

  • curprev 12:1212:12, 15 July 2024Fylindfotberserk talk contribs 3,997 bytes +57 What's written is scholarly sourced and historical. Do not remove that. The current classification by the Indian govt can be added in a separate line, with reliable source ofcourse
  • curprev 04:0004:00, 15 July 2024MusikBot II talk contribsm 3,940 bytes −17 Removing protection templates from unprotected page (more info)
  • curprev 03:5803:58, 15 July 2024117.240.186.130 talk 3,957 bytes −58 →‎History: The official NCBC classified them under Bania umbrella. Source: (4th page of PDF - central list) https://ncbc.nic.in/Writereaddata/AddBH3.pdf And understand that low status means - lower than a brahmin or kshatriya which they claimed to be. You can mention this too in the wikiapedia page like: "Because of their hereditary trade of liquor, the Kalwars are considered as Bania (caste), a Vaishya subclass, in Indian Caste hereditary, lower than Kshatriya status they claimed to be." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

23 June 2024

22 June 2024

  • curprev 22:1022:10, 22 June 2024Bishonen talk contribs 3,998 bytes −761 See WP:RAJ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_172#Are_British_Raj_ethnographers_unreliable?. Sources from the British Raj era are considered unreliable. I'm following Wikipedia's principles; please don't revert me again. Please use modern academic sources for caste information! Tag: Undo
  • curprev 19:0319:03, 22 June 2024122.168.157.202 talk 4,759 bytes +508 Official source: Narayan Saha (Calcutta High court 1906). Kalwar Caste was not considered a very low caste because they employed Brahmans like other higher castes and were considered Vaishyas. PDF page 189 : https://ia904707.us.archive.org/11/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.38256/2015.38256.Vaishya-Khandya---Saha-And-The-Shaundika-And-The-Commentary-On-Hindu---Castes.pdf Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 18:5818:58, 22 June 2024122.168.157.202 talk 4,251 bytes +253 Undid revision because Narayan Saha was esteemed and celebrated lawyer in high court of the capital of British India or British Raj. 1230443224 by Bishonen (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 18:4418:44, 22 June 2024Bishonen talk contribs 3,998 bytes −253 Undid revision 1230442873 by 122.168.157.202 (talk). Not a reliable source. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 18:4218:42, 22 June 2024122.168.157.202 talk 4,251 bytes +253 Source of Kshatriya origin : Official source by Narayan Saha (Calcutta High court 1906) (Page 11 or entire book) https://ia904707.us.archive.org/11/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.38256/2015.38256.Vaishya-Khandya---Saha-And-The-Shaundika-And-The-Commentary-On-Hindu---Castes.pdf Tag: Reverted

21 June 2024

25 May 2024

23 May 2024

22 May 2024

20 May 2024

12 May 2024

7 May 2024

12 April 2024

11 April 2024

24 March 2024

28 January 2024

27 January 2024

5 January 2024

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)