Criticism of fractional-reserve banking: Revision history

12 July 2022

• curprev 18:0218:02, 12 July 2022‎ Cewbot talk contribs‎ m 51 bytes 0‎ Fixing broken anchor: 2022-01-12 (VERY DIFFERENT 16≥10) #Criticisms→Fractional-reserve banking#Commentary undo Tag: Redirect target changed

21 December 2020

• curprev 14:0414:04, 21 December 2020‎ Cewbot talk contribs‎ m 51 bytes −30‎ Fix broken anchor: 2017-05-30T23:27:27Z #Criticisms of fractional-reserve banking→Fractional-reserve banking#Criticisms undo Tags: Redirect target changed Manual revert

9 November 2019

• curprev 13:4113:41, 9 November 2019‎ Sawol talk contribs‎ m 81 bytes 0‎ Sawol moved page Criticism of fractional reserve banking to Criticism of fractional-reserve banking without leaving a redirect: Fractional-reserve banking undo

3 January 2017

• curprev 11:0611:06, 3 January 2017‎ Гармонический Мир talk contribs‎ 81 bytes +30‎ ←Redirected page to Fractional-reserve banking#Criticisms of fractional-reserve banking undo Tag: Reverted

6 November 2014

• curprev 03:1703:17, 6 November 2014‎ Xqbot talk contribs‎ m 51 bytes 0‎ Bot: Fixing double redirect to Fractional-reserve banking undo

2 October 2012

• curprev 02:0902:09, 2 October 2012‎ Cupco talk contribs‎ 51 bytes −9,362‎ merge undo

1 October 2012

• curprev 04:0604:06, 1 October 2012‎ FRB123 talk contribs‎ 9,413 bytes +743‎ →‎General criticisms undo
• curprev 03:5703:57, 1 October 2012‎ FRB123 talk contribs‎ 8,670 bytes +28‎ →‎Counter-arguments: Deflation may not occur if prices increase, so this Austrian argument is just a theory. Money supply does not equal inflation. undo
• curprev 03:5403:54, 1 October 2012‎ FRB123 talk contribs‎ 8,642 bytes +25‎ →‎Counter-arguments: more accurate and more objective undo
• curprev 03:5303:53, 1 October 2012‎ FRB123 talk contribs‎ 8,617 bytes −7‎ →‎Counter-arguments: highly not used undo
• curprev 00:4900:49, 1 October 2012‎ FRB123 talk contribs‎ 8,624 bytes −101‎ →‎Counter-arguments: That is all the references actually say. Again commodity money and FRB are DIFFERENT concepts undo
• curprev 00:4800:48, 1 October 2012‎ FRB123 talk contribs‎ 8,725 bytes −34‎ →‎Counter-arguments: FRB is not the only way to increase money supply - money printing does as well - so sentence is simply wrong undo

30 September 2012

• curprev 17:2017:20, 30 September 2012‎ Cupco talk contribs‎ 8,759 bytes +123‎ →‎Counter-arguments: explain relevance undo
• curprev 17:0117:01, 30 September 2012‎ Cupco talk contribs‎ 8,636 bytes +1,840‎ replace counter-arguments with three source citations undo
• curprev 11:0311:03, 30 September 2012‎ Reissgo talk contribs‎ 6,796 bytes +60‎ Undid revision 515232105 I have started a discussion on the talk page of criticisms of frb. Do not undo without commenting there first. undo
• curprev 11:0211:02, 30 September 2012‎ Reissgo talk contribs‎ 6,736 bytes −763‎ self revert - oops! undo
• curprev 11:0111:01, 30 September 2012‎ Reissgo talk contribs‎ 7,499 bytes +763‎ Undid revision 515286965 I have started a discussion on the talk page of criticisms of frb. Do not undo without commenting there first. undo
• curprev 10:4010:40, 30 September 2012‎ FRB123 talk contribs‎ 6,736 bytes −763‎ →‎Counter-arguments: Deleted as irrelevant to this page - see FRB talk page for repeat of same argument/issue. undo
• curprev 00:2400:24, 30 September 2012‎ Famspear talk contribs‎ 7,499 bytes −60‎ →‎External links: Delete what appears to be commercial link to website owned by Wikipedia editor undo

29 September 2012

• curprev 23:2823:28, 29 September 2012‎ Reissgo talk contribs‎ 7,559 bytes +60‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 15:1115:11, 29 September 2012‎ John Shandy` talk contribs‎ 7,499 bytes −60‎ Undid revision 515131197 by Reissgo (talk) Fun to add your own website as an external link, I'm sure, but stop. Its removal from FRB doesn't warrant its addition to Criticism of FRB. undo
• curprev 10:3810:38, 29 September 2012‎ Reissgo talk contribs‎ 7,559 bytes +60‎ →‎External links undo
• curprev 06:5506:55, 29 September 2012‎ Cupco talk contribs‎ 7,499 bytes +110‎ →‎Counter-arguments: reword for clarity undo

28 September 2012

• curprev 18:1018:10, 28 September 2012‎ Cupco talk contribs‎ 7,389 bytes +653‎ I don't understand the edit summary which removed this. We include all points of view per the WP:NPOV policy, even in WP:POVFORK articles undo
• curprev 16:2316:23, 28 September 2012‎ Byelf2007 talk contribs‎ m 6,736 bytes 0‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 16:2216:22, 28 September 2012‎ Byelf2007 talk contribs‎ 6,736 bytes +32‎ →‎Exacerbation of the business cycle undo
• curprev 16:2216:22, 28 September 2012‎ Byelf2007 talk contribs‎ 6,704 bytes −653‎ you can argue that FRB is bad and that a commodity backed currency is bad--and that a fiat and not inflatable currency is good undo
• curprev 02:2002:20, 28 September 2012‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ m 7,357 bytes +20‎ Dating maintenance tags: {{Mergeto}} undo
• curprev 02:0002:00, 28 September 2012‎ Cupco talk contribs‎ 7,337 bytes +39‎ merge proposal: this is a WP:POVFORK undo
• curprev 01:5901:59, 28 September 2012‎ Cupco talk contribs‎ 7,298 bytes +652‎ →‎Inflation: the other point of view... isn't this article a WP:POVFORK? It's not like it's too long for a merger undo

1 July 2012

• curprev 00:1100:11, 1 July 2012‎ Tbhotch talk contribs‎ 6,646 bytes −48‎ removing a protection template from a non-protected page undo

30 June 2012

• curprev 21:3621:36, 30 June 2012‎ ShelfSkewed talk contribs‎ m 6,694 bytes −87‎ fix isbn, rm notice undo

24 June 2012

• curprev 03:5003:50, 24 June 2012‎ Skier Dude talk contribs‎ m 6,781 bytes 0‎ lower case p not working ?? undo

23 June 2012

• curprev 13:1513:15, 23 June 2012‎ Dennis Brown talk contribs‎ 6,781 bytes +47‎ Adding {{pp-vandalism}} (TW) undo
• curprev 13:1513:15, 23 June 2012‎ Dennis Brown talk contribs‎ m 6,734 bytes 0‎ Protected Criticism of fractional reserve banking: Persistent vandalism (‎[edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 13:15, 30 June 2012 (UTC))) undo
• curprev 11:4311:43, 23 June 2012‎ Bobrayner talk contribs‎ 6,734 bytes −4,008‎ let's try to keep this neutral undo
• curprev 03:4503:45, 23 June 2012‎ 101.161.150.166 talk‎ 10,742 bytes +4,008‎ Mass deletions after months of the material being on the page without controversy (fully ref'd) is "madness". To call this stuff "POV-pushing" on the CRITICISMS page is crazy. Just edit "blacks in Poland" and stay away undo
• curprev 03:3703:37, 23 June 2012‎ Volunteer Marek talk contribs‎ 6,734 bytes −4,008‎ because I adequately explained my reasons in edit summaries. Additionally, the text I removed was just ridiculous fringe pov pushing, you're an SPA and apparantly a creepy stalker to boot. Comparing me to Stasi doesnt help either undo
• curprev 03:2603:26, 23 June 2012‎ 101.161.150.166 talk‎ 10,742 bytes +4,008‎ 3RR. Take it to the talk page. What is the problem taking it to the talk page, Stasi man? undo
• curprev 03:1903:19, 23 June 2012‎ Volunteer Marek talk contribs‎ 6,734 bytes −4,008‎ revert creepy stalker undo
• curprev 03:1103:11, 23 June 2012‎ 101.161.150.166 talk‎ 10,742 bytes +4,008‎ "Crazy"? This from someone who obsesses over racism (and black Africans) in Poland? Chill my friend. All I'm asking for is that you take each edit to the talk page and not massacre the page. Like... you know... undo
• curprev 03:0703:07, 23 June 2012‎ Volunteer Marek talk contribs‎ 6,734 bytes −134‎ →‎See also: prune SA cruft undo
• curprev 03:0303:03, 23 June 2012‎ Volunteer Marek talk contribs‎ 6,868 bytes −3,874‎ "Eastern European censorship"? - i think you're getting a little crazy (i.e. more than usual) here undo
• curprev 03:0003:00, 23 June 2012‎ 101.161.150.166 talk‎ 10,742 bytes +3,874‎ Sorry but the environmental criticisms are in the FRB main page, and ref'd, and there are many edits that are trivial or don't make sense. It's not Bold, it's Eastern European censorship. undo

22 June 2012

• curprev 17:0017:00, 22 June 2012‎ Byelf2007 talk contribs‎ m 6,868 bytes +3‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:1213:12, 22 June 2012‎ Bobrayner talk contribs‎ 6,865 bytes −3,877‎ This is the R of WP:BRD undo
• curprev 12:4812:48, 22 June 2012‎ 101.161.150.166 talk‎ 10,742 bytes +3,877‎ Edits were without justification please take it to the talk page before these kinds of massive edit efforts undo

17 June 2012

• curprev 04:5404:54, 17 June 2012‎ Volunteer Marek talk contribs‎ 6,865 bytes −3,877‎ uh, nope, nothing on talk, and the stuff was removed for a reason (see edit summaries, there was just a lot that needed to be cut) undo
• curprev 01:1001:10, 17 June 2012‎ Eurogeddon talk contribs‎ 10,742 bytes +3,901‎ Revert good faith edits. Not consistent with WP policy. undo
• curprev 01:0801:08, 17 June 2012‎ Eurogeddon talk contribs‎ 6,841 bytes −24‎ Resolved see talk page undo