Jump to content

Section 230: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

2 August 2024

24 July 2024

21 July 2024

3 July 2024

1 July 2024

14 June 2024

26 April 2024

10 March 2024

10 February 2024

20 January 2024

13 January 2024

4 January 2024

24 December 2023

9 December 2023

5 December 2023

3 December 2023

14 November 2023

12 October 2023

11 October 2023

29 September 2023

25 September 2023

17 August 2023

17 July 2023

6 July 2023

24 May 2023

20 May 2023

  • curprev 14:2614:26, 20 May 2023174.238.165.106 talk 187,719 bytes +59 That was incorrect. Twitter was found not liable under the Antiterrorism act here. All plaintiffs failed to state an actionable claim under the act. The Google case was correct, though, because the court remanded the case so the lower court could take Twitter into account. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

18 May 2023

1 May 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)