Talk:(308933) 2006 SQ372: Revision history

9 January 2024

• curprev 21:5621:56, 9 January 2024‎ Qwerfjkl (bot) talk contribs‎ 17,818 bytes +30‎ Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26) undo Tag: paws [2.2]

23 August 2023

• curprev 10:4310:43, 23 August 2023‎ PrimeBOT talk contribs‎ m 17,788 bytes −1‎ →‎top: Task 30: template merge following a discussion undo Tag: AWB

6 June 2023

• curprev 02:0002:00, 6 June 2023‎ Queen of Hearts talk contribs‎ m 17,789 bytes +13‎ fix unsectioned comment undo Tag: AWB

29 January 2023

• curprev 16:4316:43, 29 January 2023‎ MalnadachBot talk contribs‎ m 17,776 bytes +105‎ Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) undo Tag: AWB

13 June 2017

• curprev 19:2919:29, 13 June 2017‎ InternetArchiveBot talk contribs‎ 17,671 bytes +1,245‎ Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.4beta) undo

3 September 2016

• curprev 23:1423:14, 3 September 2016‎ InternetArchiveBot talk contribs‎ 16,426 bytes +1,496‎ Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2) undo

31 August 2016

• curprev 18:4318:43, 31 August 2016‎ MarnetteD talk contribs‎ 14,930 bytes −1‎ →‎External links modified: the update was successful undo
• curprev 01:3701:37, 31 August 2016‎ InternetArchiveBot talk contribs‎ 14,931 bytes +1,554‎ Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2beta5) undo

22 February 2016

• curprev 19:0119:01, 22 February 2016‎ Tom.Reding talk contribs‎ m 13,377 bytes +64‎ →‎top: +{{WikiProject Astronomy|class|importance|object=yes}} using AWB undo

20 December 2011

• curprev 03:3503:35, 20 December 2011‎ The Tom talk contribs‎ m 13,313 bytes 0‎ moved Talk:2006 SQ372 to Talk:(308933) 2006 SQ372: catalogue number undo

14 June 2011

• curprev 06:5606:56, 14 June 2011‎ JeffGBot talk contribs‎ m 13,313 bytes +469‎ →Robot: Reporting unavailable external link undo
• curprev 06:5506:55, 14 June 2011‎ JeffGBot talk contribs‎ m 12,844 bytes +442‎ →Robot: Reporting unavailable external link undo

24 January 2011

• curprev 20:1020:10, 24 January 2011‎ Cyclopia talk contribs‎ 12,402 bytes +489‎ →‎Orbital period?: re undo
• curprev 19:2819:28, 24 January 2011‎ Ruslik0 talk contribs‎ 11,913 bytes +514‎ →‎Orbital period? undo
• curprev 16:2516:25, 24 January 2011‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 11,399 bytes +868‎ →‎Orbital period?: reply undo
• curprev 15:4415:44, 24 January 2011‎ Cyclopia talk contribs‎ 10,531 bytes +885‎ →‎Orbital period?: re undo
• curprev 15:1715:17, 24 January 2011‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 9,646 bytes +593‎ →‎Orbital period?: Is the heliocentric orbital period meaningful or misleading? Hard to say since it is correct for the 2011 heliocentric epoch referenced. undo

23 January 2011

• curprev 18:3218:32, 23 January 2011‎ Cyclopia talk contribs‎ 9,053 bytes +607‎ →‎Orbital period?: comment undo
• curprev 16:4016:40, 23 January 2011‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 8,446 bytes +513‎ {{od}} undo
• curprev 12:5112:51, 23 January 2011‎ Cyclopia talk contribs‎ 7,933 bytes +451‎ →‎Orbital period?: re undo
• curprev 07:3807:38, 23 January 2011‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 7,482 bytes +64‎ →‎Orbital period?: With a 2012 epoch this object will show aphelion around 1834AU. undo
• curprev 07:1407:14, 23 January 2011‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 7,418 bytes +127‎ →‎Orbital period?: If you push the Epoch out a few hundred years the aphelion and orbital period start falling much closer to the lower numbers. undo
• curprev 06:5906:59, 23 January 2011‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 7,291 bytes +267‎ →‎Orbital period?: the edit looks like it was legit when using a 2009 epoch undo
• curprev 06:3806:38, 23 January 2011‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 7,024 bytes +441‎ →‎Orbital period?: hmmm someone updated the period in 2009 undo
• curprev 05:5205:52, 23 January 2011‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 6,583 bytes +155‎ →‎Orbital period? undo
• curprev 03:3603:36, 23 January 2011‎ Cyclopia talk contribs‎ 6,428 bytes +362‎ →‎Orbital period?: comment undo
• curprev 03:0703:07, 23 January 2011‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 6,066 bytes +330‎ →‎Orbital period?: As the planets also pull on the object (n-body solution) the true orbital period will be somewhat less. undo
• curprev 02:5402:54, 23 January 2011‎ 85.217.37.129 talk‎ 5,736 bytes +344‎ →‎Orbital period? undo

21 January 2011

• curprev 09:5909:59, 21 January 2011‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 5,392 bytes +736‎ →‎Orbital period?: Orbital parameters are epoch dependent undo
• curprev 07:2507:25, 21 January 2011‎ 85.217.46.254 talk‎ 4,656 bytes +395‎ →‎Orbital period?: new section undo

1 March 2009

• curprev 23:5223:52, 1 March 2009‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 4,261 bytes +1‎ class=Start undo

15 January 2009

• curprev 11:1611:16, 15 January 2009‎ Iridia talk contribs‎ m 4,260 bytes +15‎ rated article undo

17 November 2008

• curprev 22:1822:18, 17 November 2008‎ Chesnok talk contribs‎ m 4,245 bytes −8‎ No edit summary undo

16 September 2008

• curprev 08:5808:58, 16 September 2008‎ Chesnok talk contribs‎ 4,253 bytes +181‎ No edit summary undo

15 September 2008

• curprev 17:0217:02, 15 September 2008‎ Cyclopia talk contribs‎ 4,072 bytes +257‎ →‎A Centaur? undo
• curprev 14:5314:53, 15 September 2008‎ Chesnok talk contribs‎ 3,815 bytes +204‎ →‎A Centaur? undo
• curprev 14:4614:46, 15 September 2008‎ Chesnok talk contribs‎ 3,611 bytes +317‎ →‎A Centaur? undo

14 September 2008

• curprev 11:0811:08, 14 September 2008‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 3,294 bytes +686‎ →‎A Centaur?: There are 3 centaurs (Chiron, 60558 Echeclus, and 166P/NEAT 2001 T4) that are classified as Comets. undo

13 September 2008

• curprev 17:2917:29, 13 September 2008‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 2,608 bytes +298‎ Don't Agree... undo
• curprev 17:2317:23, 13 September 2008‎ Chesnok talk contribs‎ 2,310 bytes +200‎ →‎A Centaur? undo

6 September 2008

• curprev 10:4110:41, 6 September 2008‎ Cyclopia talk contribs‎ 2,110 bytes +245‎ →‎A Centaur?: thanks undo
• curprev 05:4405:44, 6 September 2008‎ Kheider talk contribs‎ 1,865 bytes +457‎ →‎A Centaur?: reply. :-) undo

5 September 2008

• curprev 16:0716:07, 5 September 2008‎ Cyclopia talk contribs‎ 1,408 bytes +815‎ is our object a centaur or not? undo

19 August 2008

• curprev 09:0209:02, 19 August 2008‎ Cyclopia talk contribs‎ 593 bytes +217‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 01:4701:47, 19 August 2008‎ Victor falk talk contribs‎ 376 bytes +21‎ {{WPSS|class=stub}} undo

18 August 2008

• curprev 23:5523:55, 18 August 2008‎ DanDixon talk contribs‎ 355 bytes +91‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 19:1519:15, 18 August 2008‎ DanDixon talk contribs‎ 264 bytes +264‎ ← Created page with 'The Universe Today article says that "Scientists believe the object is only 50-100 kilometers (30-60 miles) across." Despite the title of the article, this is not ...'