Talk:Speed limit enforcement: Revision history

31 January 2024

• curprev 09:2609:26, 31 January 2024‎ Qwerfjkl (bot) talk contribs‎ 84,206 bytes +42‎ Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26) undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

6 April 2023

• curprev 02:2902:29, 6 April 2023‎ Doniago talk contribs‎ m 84,164 bytes −216‎ Reverted edits by 125.235.238.149 (talk) to last version by MalnadachBot no agreement to archive undo Tag: Rollback

5 April 2023

• curprev 13:3813:38, 5 April 2023‎ 125.235.238.149 talk‎ 84,380 bytes +216‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

3 April 2023

• curprev 19:2619:26, 3 April 2023‎ MalnadachBot talk contribs‎ m 84,164 bytes +160‎ Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) undo Tag: AWB

2 June 2021

• curprev 08:3808:38, 2 June 2021‎ MalnadachBot talk contribs‎ m 84,004 bytes +16‎ Fixed Lint errors in Cyberbot II's signature (Task 1) undo Tag: AWB

12 November 2020

• curprev 19:0419:04, 12 November 2020‎ SineBot talk contribs‎ m 83,988 bytes +286‎ Signing comment by 88.136.216.31 - "→‎France: new section" undo
• curprev 19:0319:03, 12 November 2020‎ 88.136.216.31 talk‎ 83,702 bytes +320‎ →‎France: new section undo

4 May 2020

• curprev 11:5311:53, 4 May 2020‎ Klbrain talk contribs‎ 83,382 bytes +257‎ →‎Proposed merge with TASCAR: Alternative target undo

12 September 2019

• curprev 11:3911:39, 12 September 2019‎ Runipedia talk contribs‎ 83,125 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 11:3611:36, 12 September 2019‎ Runipedia talk contribs‎ 83,124 bytes +669‎ No edit summary undo

24 June 2019

• curprev 03:5803:58, 24 June 2019‎ No1lakersfan talk contribs‎ 82,455 bytes +265‎ Proposing to merge TASCAR into Speed limit enforcement (TW) undo

26 July 2017

• curprev 21:1621:16, 26 July 2017‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 82,190 bytes +251‎ →‎Inaccurate lead: done undo

19 July 2017

• curprev 11:4111:41, 19 July 2017‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 81,939 bytes 0‎ →‎Inaccurate lead: typo undo
• curprev 06:3706:37, 19 July 2017‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 81,939 bytes +991‎ →‎Inaccurate lead: new section undo

25 February 2016

• curprev 09:5109:51, 25 February 2016‎ Cyberbot II talk contribs‎ 80,948 bytes +1,745‎ Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot undo

14 April 2014

• curprev 12:0912:09, 14 April 2014‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 79,203 bytes +312‎ →‎Body of article not in agreement with referenced material: A little too complex? undo
• curprev 12:0512:05, 14 April 2014‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ m 78,891 bytes +66‎ Moved new contribution to correct place at end undo
• curprev 11:4711:47, 14 April 2014‎ SineBot talk contribs‎ m 78,825 bytes +306‎ Signing comment by 194.144.172.231 - "Body of article not in agreement with referenced material" undo
• curprev 11:4611:46, 14 April 2014‎ 194.144.172.231 talk‎ 78,519 bytes +979‎ Body of article not in agreement with referenced material undo

21 June 2011

• curprev 10:2910:29, 21 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 77,540 bytes +523‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: We need neutral coverage of the topic undo
• curprev 10:1810:18, 21 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 77,017 bytes +555‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: Please learn how negotiation works undo
• curprev 09:1709:17, 21 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 76,462 bytes +1,566‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: Response to HiLo48 undo
• curprev 09:0509:05, 21 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 74,896 bytes +1‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: ->Dispute resolution undo
• curprev 09:0409:04, 21 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 74,895 bytes +229‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: ->Dispute resolution undo
• curprev 08:4708:47, 21 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 74,666 bytes +1,061‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: I give up. May seek a third opinion. undo
• curprev 08:2608:26, 21 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 73,605 bytes +47‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: More undo
• curprev 08:2408:24, 21 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 73,558 bytes +258‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: re removal of valid content undo

20 June 2011

• curprev 20:2820:28, 20 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 73,300 bytes +188‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: Pure OR undo
• curprev 12:3812:38, 20 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 73,112 bytes 0‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: More general undo
• curprev 12:3712:37, 20 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 73,112 bytes +76‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: More undo
• curprev 12:2912:29, 20 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 73,036 bytes +336‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: This one undo
• curprev 11:2611:26, 20 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 72,700 bytes +113‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: Exactly what is that question? undo
• curprev 10:3510:35, 20 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 72,587 bytes +547‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: I'm concentrating on article content though undo
• curprev 09:5709:57, 20 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 72,040 bytes +52‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: I gave my reasons. You haven't refuted them. undo
• curprev 09:5309:53, 20 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 71,988 bytes +554‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: I gave my reasons. You haven't refuted them. undo
• curprev 08:4808:48, 20 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 71,434 bytes +526‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: We should be addressing the article's POV neutrality, not inconvenient truths undo
• curprev 08:0108:01, 20 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 70,908 bytes +902‎ →‎Is the revenue raised actually relevant to Speed limit enforcement?: new section undo

17 June 2011

• curprev 20:1120:11, 17 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 70,006 bytes +34‎ →‎Factual clarification: Tidied to clarify undo
• curprev 19:2319:23, 17 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 69,972 bytes −56‎ Moved my contribution to the only logical place for it. It wasn't addressed to DeFacto. He can do what he likes with his argument's location. (It shouldn't be here, or anywhere.) I shouldn't have bitten. Apologies. undo
• curprev 12:2412:24, 17 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 70,028 bytes +490‎ →‎Factual clarification: Needs further clarification undo
• curprev 12:1612:16, 17 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 69,538 bytes +155‎ Shall we move this to a new section? (Please revert if you disagree) undo
• curprev 12:1212:12, 17 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 69,383 bytes +151‎ →‎Dispiute #2 - relevance of the mention of the 2008 toll: You don't read nor comprehend my posts. No point in continuing this undo
• curprev 12:0212:02, 17 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 69,232 bytes +221‎ →‎Dispiute #2 - relevance of the mention of the 2008 toll: Fix it or delete it then - why not? undo
• curprev 11:5311:53, 17 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 69,011 bytes +170‎ →‎Dispiute #2 - relevance of the mention of the 2008 toll: Response to another stupid Edit summary undo
• curprev 08:4608:46, 17 June 2011‎ DeFacto talk contribs‎ 68,841 bytes +293‎ →‎Dispiute #2 - relevance of the mention of the 2008 toll: Don't keep resorting to fallacious arguments undo
• curprev 08:1508:15, 17 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 68,548 bytes +562‎ →‎Dispiute #2 - relevance of the mention of the 2008 toll: I suspect this will not be the final discussion on this matter. undo
• curprev 08:0508:05, 17 June 2011‎ Ephebi talk contribs‎ 67,986 bytes +817‎ →‎Dispiute #2 - relevance of the mention of the 2008 toll undo
• curprev 07:3407:34, 17 June 2011‎ Socrates2008 talk contribs‎ 67,169 bytes +41‎ →‎Dispiute #2 - relevance of the mention of the 2008 toll: ...and this would be a good point to close this one too undo

16 June 2011

• curprev 23:2023:20, 16 June 2011‎ Socrates2008 talk contribs‎ 67,128 bytes +41‎ →‎Dispute #1 - POV neutrality: Assuming this is now closed undo
• curprev 23:2023:20, 16 June 2011‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 67,087 bytes +886‎ →‎Dispiute #2 - relevance of the mention of the 2008 toll: Complex topic. Simplistic analysis from a biased starting point will not deliver a good article undo