Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Brother, Borat: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:52, 27 November 2010

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, I can tell which way the WP:SNOW is blowing. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My Brother, Borat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film that's still in production, mentioned in a single news article. Doesn't seem notable enough; also, see WP:CRYSTAL. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:16, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP according to http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11811933 the film has been made and is awaiting release. A cursory google search also generates a full page of news results from differing sources (bbc/NY times etc). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carl Sixsmith (talk • contribs) 18:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC) [reply]
Keep, lots of reliable coverage. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Much coverage and love in the mainstream press. This is a sequel to a famous movie. Tomas Gilbfarb (talk) 01:15, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With respects to the nominator, as the film has been completed, is covered in multiple reliable sources, and is simply awaiting release, an article about the film is specifically encouraged by both policy and guideline. See Time Magazine New York Times Observer Cinema Blend BBC News et al Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:35, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- And since opining above, I have expanded and sourced the article.[1] More to do yes... but no longer quite the stub that was first nominated. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 10:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NFILM. Film has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and principal photography has begun. Uncle Dick (talk) 04:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Film has reliable sources. --Monterey Bay (talk) 06:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to be reliably sourced. --nsaum75^{¡שיחת!‎} 08:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Film has drawn international media coverage, hence is notable. Since the articles expansion and referencing by User:MichaelQSchmidt its content appears to be reliable.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[My Brother, Borat]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''Speedy keep''', I can tell which way the [[WP:SNOW]] is blowing.  [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] ([[User talk:NawlinWiki|talk]]) 13:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
+===[[My Brother, Borat]]===
 :{{la|My Brother, Borat}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Brother, Borat|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 November 26#{{anchorencode:My Brother, Borat}}|View log]]</noinclude>){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:My Brother, Borat}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}
 :({{Find sources|My Brother, Borat}})
@@ Line 17: / Line 22: @@
 *'''Keep''' seems to be reliably sourced.  --[[User:nsaum75|<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">nsaum75</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:nsaum75|<span lang="he" xml:lang="he" dir="rtl">¡שיחת!</span>&lrm;]]</sup> 08:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' Film has drawn international media coverage, hence is notable. Since the articles expansion and referencing by [[User:MichaelQSchmidt]] its content appears to be reliable.
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>