User talk:Got Milked

Hello, Got Milked! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 00:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Schoolhouse Rock

Hi, Got Milked! I've reverted your changes to Schoolhouse Rock! because we don't link every instance of a name in an article. Too many links takes away from the specialness! Though seriously, there's a manual of style for when to link. Take a look at MOS:LINK when you get a chance. Thanks for your work, and happy editing! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 06:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Lin Zexu

Hi Got Milked. I'm reverting the section you added to First Opium War. There are two reasons. First, it is not properly cited (the website you've cited does not say most of what you've added to the section). Second, if you do have a source for the reverence of Lin Zexu (I don't doubt this) that should probably go in the Lin Zexu article or, at best, somewhere in the consequences of the opium war. It does not warrant a section on its own in this article. Please note that I don't doubt the information you have added. My concern is that this is not the appropriate place and that it is not properly cited. --Regents Park (moult with my mallards) 12:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Much better. :-) BTW, Maurice Collis, in his book, Foreign mud, also says a lot about Lin Zexu. Apparently he was already well known because of his work cleaning up corruption in the north (Manchuria, I think). A very interesting man. --Regents Park (moult with my mallards) 21:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I notice you have the same issue in the Opium Wars article. Could you go ahead and make the same changes in that article as well? Thanks! --Regents Park (moult with my mallards) 02:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Liu Xiang

Thanks for making this edit. I can't believe I didn't pick up that myself. Perhaps the original editor meant to say he was their first men's gold medallist on the track rather than athletics or track and field events in general. I'm not sure if that claim stands up...

In terms of the "unrevealed injury" at the 2008 Olympics, I'm not sure if that's exactly true. I'm pretty sure I remember my own (and the BBC commentator's) opinion was one of surprise that he was even on the start line in the first place (because of the general knowledge that he was injured), and the inevitable walk away when he couldn't run. I think it was the case that the Chinese had sought to underplay his injury in the outside hope that he could compete. I've no citations on this yet so maybe it's all just my own point of view. I'll have a look... Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)^{Join WikiProject Athletics!} 15:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

The Prefontaine, Olympic preview and Olympic heats reports seem to suggest my ideas are indeed quite plausible, but I guess it will always be a bit inconclusive. Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)^{Join WikiProject Athletics!} 16:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Dog meat

You seem like a well informed and open minded and impartial person. There are these individuals who are trying to control what is directly accessible in the Dog meat article, by deleting my logical and relevant linking of the Horse meat article in its See Also section. I can understand their need to maintain a certain level of white pride and Asian cultural-secessionism by disassociating certain European(and their close-ally/favorite Asian) taboo meat cultures/nations to make an outright disconnect in these taboo meat articles relative to dog meat, which most likely have their largest proportion of consumers in such places as China, Korea and Vietnam: whereas in cat and horse meat consumption, the partiality toward the eastern/central Asians to that of non-Asians is far less(and complicity with Europeans far more) and thus the "Wikipedia controllers" for white pride(and pride of their closest allies and "friendlies"), work to make or delete such edits. But this really has nothing to do with proper presentation of white people's eating habits or how the eating habits of western democracy's closest ally nations should be seen. The inclusion of horse meat in the See Also section should constitute a consistent and simple American(not necessarily objective) and all English-language reader-observation of relevant facts and comparative study to the culture of eating these animals to which American and other "democratized" people should objectively examine without feeling humiliated, like how the editors and Dog meat article-controllers here are doing here by omitting direct reader-access to these relevant articles for comparative examination. Of course, as difficult as it may be for them to accept, the link to horse meat and other relevant "taboo meats" will be included in the See Also section. KulqihanAtqa (talk) 06:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)