Jump to content

User talk:Grutness: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
:Thanks folks - I'll be sitting out of WP for a while at least, though (probably not permanently). Too angry at the moment - I wouldn't be able to edit properly or admin fairly. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
:Thanks folks - I'll be sitting out of WP for a while at least, though (probably not permanently). Too angry at the moment - I wouldn't be able to edit properly or admin fairly. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
::Very sorry to see you go, if you are. I'd give it a while & see how you feel. All the best, [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 01:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
::Very sorry to see you go, if you are. I'd give it a while & see how you feel. All the best, [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 01:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I will not be sad to see you disappear permanently from Wikipedia. Your contributions were simply word-for-word copying. Get over yourself & don't return...

Revision as of 03:52, 15 September 2011

Owing to the unsubstantiated claims of both plagiarism and lying levelled at me by one Wikipedian editor, I have decided to terminate my editing activity. It has been fun while it lasted, but there's always one fuckwit willing to queer the pitch. Have fun everyone. Grutness...wha? 05:23, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • That's a great pity, you have been a great editor. I have encountered many fuckwits queering the pitch, so I understand your frustration and anger and hope that it will soon subside and you will feel able to return. Giacomo Returned 07:14, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And who is supposed to give us grief over stubs and categories when you are gone? Agathoclea (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review for Francis Petre

I have nominated Francis Petre for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. You are receiving this notice because you were identified as one of three editors with the most edits to the article. Brad (talk) 08:36, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?!

Nooooo! Don't leave us...please... I came over to respond to your trout (thanks very much), and THIS is the news? *wailing and gnashing of teeth*.

Don't let the fuckwits win, G.

Pegship (talk) 19:12, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded, it's been a long time since we've interacted but this is bad news. I don't like talking like this but after reviewing a couple talk pages there appears to be several fuckwits involved here. I wish that were a blockable offense. RxS (talk) 00:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks folks - I'll be sitting out of WP for a while at least, though (probably not permanently). Too angry at the moment - I wouldn't be able to edit properly or admin fairly. Grutness...wha? 00:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Very sorry to see you go, if you are. I'd give it a while & see how you feel. All the best, Johnbod (talk) 01:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be sad to see you disappear permanently from Wikipedia. Your contributions were simply word-for-word copying. Get over yourself & don't return...