Jump to content

Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses' handling of child sexual abuse: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Zengalileo (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 17: Line 17:


:You don't seem to be suggesting any actual improvements to the article. This isn't the place to just complain that you don't like the article. Do you have any specific suggestions?--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 08:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
:You don't seem to be suggesting any actual improvements to the article. This isn't the place to just complain that you don't like the article. Do you have any specific suggestions?--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 08:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

I have spent way more time than I have going back and forth with you. Don't you remember? I have made numerous revisions and offered many suggestions. I am intimately familiar on this subject. I have testified in court as an expert on JW policies. I led the largest organization on the topic of blood and JWs for several years. I was born and raised a JW. If you knew more than me on this topic, I would know your name. So what is your name? My name is Shawn Dean. I have asked you before if you are or were a JW, and if not, what is your interest in this topic. You refuse to answer. You may be a paid-by-Watchtower freelance writer. I am asking you at this time to disclose why you are so keenly interested in this topic. No one just randomly takes on a mission, and just randomly takes on JWs and child abuse when they don't have some kind of connection to Watchtower. That wouldn't make any sense. And I'm not the only one who has noticed your edits always seem to fall on the side that makes WT look better. Explain your fascination. I'm calling you a fraud right now. Prove that you are not. [[User:Zengalileo|Zengalileo]] ([[User talk:Zengalileo|talk]]) 01:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:51, 31 May 2021

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconChristianity: Witnesses Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses (assessed as Top-importance).
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What is the purpose of Wikipedia as it pertains to this subject?

It seems to me that if you set rigid parameters and a myriad of legalistic policies and procedures and clench and grasp on to those rules with Nazi-like fervor, casting out all sense and judgment in the name of rule following and in the process produce an article that is inaccurate and full of falsehoods or in the very least woefully inadequate and incomplete, then all you have done is produce garbage that falls within the rules and policies of wikipedia. The goal of wikipedia then becomes " to write articles that follow the rues of wikipedia for the sake of following the rules of wikipedia true, false for better or worse." So go to bed tonight feeling smug that you have followed wiki rules and nothing else. Zengalileo (talk) 23:59, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to be suggesting any actual improvements to the article. This isn't the place to just complain that you don't like the article. Do you have any specific suggestions?--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have spent way more time than I have going back and forth with you. Don't you remember? I have made numerous revisions and offered many suggestions. I am intimately familiar on this subject. I have testified in court as an expert on JW policies. I led the largest organization on the topic of blood and JWs for several years. I was born and raised a JW. If you knew more than me on this topic, I would know your name. So what is your name? My name is Shawn Dean. I have asked you before if you are or were a JW, and if not, what is your interest in this topic. You refuse to answer. You may be a paid-by-Watchtower freelance writer. I am asking you at this time to disclose why you are so keenly interested in this topic. No one just randomly takes on a mission, and just randomly takes on JWs and child abuse when they don't have some kind of connection to Watchtower. That wouldn't make any sense. And I'm not the only one who has noticed your edits always seem to fall on the side that makes WT look better. Explain your fascination. I'm calling you a fraud right now. Prove that you are not. Zengalileo (talk) 01:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]