User talk:The Haunted Angel

Archives

May 2006 - October 2006 November 2006 - December 2006 Janurary 2007 -

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for all the hard work you're doing today, January 2, 2007 with reverting vandalism. You've earned it. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 20:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Congrats. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 20:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou very much, mate!! ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 20:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

You're very welcome. Keep up the good work. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 20:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

The Message I restored

Hey, Haunted Angel. I didnt mean to upset you by restoring the message that user PlanPlan or something posted. I just noticed it was removed by User: EVula and I feel that no user has a right to remove content from another user's page. So I put it back. And you know I dont agree with that cult of Christian vandals (or more likely Christian vandal), like I said I felt it was your user talk page and your message, not EVulas. So dont be mad please. American Brit 22:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry about it dude, you didn't annoy me or anything, I understand why you do did it, I recently had a little somethin' like that happen over at Wookieepedia. Either way though, EVula is someone I work with frequently, and I trust any action he makes -- if he hadn't have removed that from my page, then I would have anyway; so don't worry if EVula removes anything from my page, the only stuff he is likely to remove the bullshit that is relentlessly slapped here, and shouldn't be put here anyway, so I give anyone permission to remove things which they believe has no place here such as the recent crap. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 22:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, The Haunted Angel! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. froth^{T C} 01:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou, kind sir! ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 01:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

LEAVE ME ALONE

Please refrain from messing with any page assigned to my ip address. I am of no conern to you so back off.--Aarongrand

You are not permitted to remove warning templates from your talk page. I will therefore continue to replace them each time they are removed, until your editing privileges are removed. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 00:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Just a thank you

Just wanted to say that I have noticed the great work you are doing, particularly with vandals and user talk page blanking. Mahalo nui loa! --Kukini 01:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

No thanks are needed my friend, all in a day's work, but I greatly appreciate your encouragement, and so I thank you :) ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 01:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

OK...now that is amazingly thorough...you even fix grammar on your own user talk page![1]--Kukini 01:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Hehe, I'm a bit of a grammar fiend you see, I have to have it as perfect as I can get it =D ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 01:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

I think you need to get a life outside of this pathetic computer world and see what you are missing out in the real world. Back off and let people change their OWN user pages. --Mlive

So I'm the one who has no life when you are the one who thinks it's hilarious and clever to vandalise and encyclopedia -- vandalism that can be reverted with a click of a button. No, I'm afraid that I am contributing to a respectable website, whereas you are simply defying the rules -- such as removing warning templates from your talk page. Continue to make a nuisance of yourself and other screen names by you will be indefinitely blocked and your IP will soon follow. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 10:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Carlos Fonseca

TDC gives the impression in his edits that Fonseca was a dupe of the KGB -- that the KGB masterminded the Nicaraguan Revolution. This his pure hockum. I challenge you to look at KGB's edits throughout the wikipedia. They are disruptive and self-serving of a right-wing agenda. The Gordievsky and Vasili Mitrokhin material he uses as a source (by way of Christopher Andrew) is highly dubious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.33.169 (talk • contribs)

I take it by this that I reverted one of your edits that you believed that an edit I removed deserved to be there. I was in fact one RC patrol with Anti-Vandal; if I removed an edit of yours, it appeared to be vandalism. As you believe it is not then, forgive me, and feel free to restore what I removed; to ensure that this does not happen again, your best bet is to get an account (simply click at the top where it says "Sign in or create account" and follow the instructions), and leave an edit summary. Thanks ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 00:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Point taken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.33.169 (talk • contribs)

Another tiny thing, so that people know who you are, please sign your name on talk pages simply by typing four tildes (~~~~). ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 00:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Look at what i did before you revert it

look at what the pic was — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.162.7.75 (talk • contribs)

As with the statement that I made to the other IP just above, it appears that I reverted and edit that I thought was vandalism, but infact wasn't. This wasn't because of the picture, but because of other edits to the article. Either way, you have my apologies. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 00:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Yo

Very little I can do about the amount of shit that hits the fan on your talk page, but do you want me to semi-protect your userpage? It might cut down on some of the vandalism (and you'd still be able to edit it). EVula // talk // ☯ // 01:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

The crap that infects my talk page doesn't really bother me a huge amount, but it is an undeniable annoyance. Go ahead and semi-protect, my friend. Not gonna' stop some of the overzealous religious activists that like to make comments (although ever since that IP got the ban there have been few-no posts here) but at least it'll cut down other rubbish. Many thanks ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 01:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Your user page is now semi-protected, but your talk page will have to remain susceptible; aside from the random crazies, there are perfectly legitimate reasons for an anon/newbie editor to contact you. Oh well, that just gives me more heads to crack. ;-) EVula // talk // ☯ // 01:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I wasn't too sure if I should have my talk page protected anyway, as you said, IP's may need to contact me, as above. Thanks anyway dude! ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 02:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Ismailis

I was making my constribution not vandalizing, therefore I think it is not correct to take out my facts on this cult

The edit you made, I believe, was to the person's User Page. Messages should be directed towards his talk page. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 01:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

... for the userpage revert. Looks like there's a little fella out there with some anger-management issues ... NewEnglandYankee 02:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Lmao, I could read what he wrote over and over again, it really is quite amusing how frustrated he got purely because you reverted his pathetic vandalism. Ah, some people :P ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 13:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Perfect Adminster

Hi Haunted Angel. I just wanted to say I think you are a very good Wikipedian. You have won so many awards and so I think you would be a perfect adminster (yes I know its spelled wrong, I am a poor speller). Why not rquest adminstership?. American Brit 04:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Boy Haunted Angel you should have been around tonight. EVula has been kept busy indefintly banning Christian vandals, User: SirChristdom‎ and User: WikiTitan‎. For the past two days they have been attacking a user named User:Dylankidwell‎. Well they got theyre punishment. Blocked forever. American Brit 05:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

PS after the bans they threatened on their talk pages to kill EVula. EVula has added the threats to his user page. American Brit 06:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, crazy fun tonight. User:EVula#Collection of threats has all the good stuff. All three of the editors have not only been indefinitely blocked, but I also locked down their talk pages, so they can't even use them anymore. Hoo-boy, good times. EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Lmao, I often have so much amusement reading through the insults on EVula's page, I even went onto YouTube and saw the dude refer to EVula as a "lughead". It does get so amusing, as does the fact that no matter where I go on the site, or when I'm on RC patrol, I often see EVula slapping warning templates on their pages, often to their dis-amusement. As for me applying to be a sysop, I believe that the requirements say that it's not entirely based on RC patrols, which is primarily what I do with my spare time. I do dedicate a lot of my time to looking after other pages (such as Mortal Kombat, Satanism, and Cradle of Filth) but before I accept any nomination I'm going to spend more time looking after articles rather then trying to base my adminship on the fact that I spend too much time on VandalProof. Thanks for the support thought ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 17:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Before I ran through RfA, I submitted myself for an editor review (mine). The feedback I got I found incredibly helpful, as far as what I needed to do to earn the community's trust (for example, spending more time slapping vandal talk pages and engaging in XfD discussions). If you ever get to the point where you actually want a mop, I'd highly recommend doing a review. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't aware there was such a thing, but thanks a lot for pointing me towards it, I'll check it out and see how it goes; thanks for the advice, my friend ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 21:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Saw The Light

Well Angel I can see you have at last realized that American Brit is the sock puppet of over 20 "Christian vandals". I have followed the war since it started back in September and knew from day one. Many users have been fooled by his good account/bad account. I thought how dumb can these users be (no offense). I figured it out through several clues..

• 1. American Brit was a poor speller like the vandals.
• 2. Evertime the vandals posted here Brit responed within minutes.
• 3. When they attacked EVula he reponed very quickly.
• 4. When the I.P.'s were banned he did not edit until they expired.
• 5. He forgot to sign out once when he posted an attack on you and erased it instantly. He was editing under 68. etc. and it is now in your archives in November 2006.
• 6. All the I.P.'s were from West Virgnia were he lives.
• 7. He defended the vandals on his talk page. He later deleted this but if you check the page history you will find it. It was back when you threatened to have a vandal blocked he said "dont do it Haunted Angel. I believe everyone deserves a second chance"

So you know see that American Brit is as guilty as the vandals. You said you once suspected him but changed your mind. When did you almost see the light the first time? Anyway Im sure he has a punishment comming. 74.195.132.34 20:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't call this exactly "seeing the light", but I suspected for a while. What seemed to convince me that he wasn't the Sock Master was that he accused himself of being the vandal, if he was in apparent the vandal. As I said, I suspected, yet decided against it; but I suspected for some of the reasons above. Just because some of the reasons were there, I wasn't going to assume that they were true however, such thoughts will eventually lead to paranoia. Ah well. Let's call it the end of it. I was deceived, as were others, but that'll be called the end of it; and punishments will be given to the appropriate. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 22:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

I was not trying to sound rude earlier. Haunted Angel which of my seven reasons had you decided were evidence of his sock puppetry? 74.195.132.34 23:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

I think most of them, except number 1, occurred to me at some point or another. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 23:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

The thought crossed my mind, specifically based on point #1...but only in passing. I have to say I'm disappointed. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 04:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I have placed my defense over at Wikipedia incidenents and on Majorlys talk page. Apparently he is the only one who believes I am innocnet of these false statements. Haunted Angel, you know I am innocent. Dozens upon Dozens of tiles I came to your defense aganst these vandals. And know as fond of you as I am, you are turning aganst me. I am very upset by all this but expecially at you. Like I said before YOU KNOW I AM INNOCENT. Just think about it. American Brit 04:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

In retrospect, these edits look like someone temporarily mixed up his attacking and defending accounts. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 05:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, commented on the first of the points that Jim Douglas bought forth when it was first made; that's when I got a tad suspicious. It's hard to believe you are innocent, Brit, when a UC confirms you are behind it. I am disappointed. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 09:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Believe what you all want. I know I am telling the truth and that is what mattters. Even Wikipedia, like the world, lacks real justice. American Brit 19:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I told you why I made the first edit Jim Douglas points out. The second one proves nothing. American Brit 19:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately, a User Check confirms that the Sock Master, you are. This cannot be disputed -- unless you accuse an Admin of lying and falsely accusing you. I'm sorry it's had to come to this, but no respect for you, I now have, unless proven an Admin's lies are. Excuse the Yoda-speak. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 21:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Are you really going to fall for his lies again? Haunted Angel has checkuser lyed before? He is obvouisly a liar himself. He has little respect. 74.195.132.34 23:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

<Yoda>Said all I needed to, in last reply, I did.</Yoda> ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 23:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC) (I think I need to stop with the Yoda now...)

What does yoda mean? This is me 68.etc. I created an account. I promise I wont let you down like Brit did Stralia 23:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Ever watched Star Wars? Yoda is a primary character in it, and <Yoda> speak in reverse he does. Too much speak like this, I do. </Yoda> ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 23:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Like I said Haunted Angel you know I am innocent. Think of all the times I helped you with the vandaism. I thought of you as one of my closest friends (and in spite of all this, I still do) and hoped you would know this is all a lie. American Brit 19:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I do not "know" you're innocent, and and it appears that all of this is a lie due to the UC. Although I was surprised and this whole incident was somewhat difficult to believe at first, it is not impossible, and as I said, have had minor suspicions. I am disappointed in you, because of the reasons you said above, helping with vandalism. Yet one person can deceive everyone and pretend to be someone they're not. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 19:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I didnt help with vandalism. I defended you when it came to vandals. How many times did I help you? So many you know if I was the sockpuppetmaster I would have grew tired. American Brit 19:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I direct you again back to what I said just. It doesn't require a genious to pretend to be someone else, especially on an Internet forum where someone can have multiple accounts, create havock with the one only to swoop in with the other to help revert vandalism. Go back the the link in my last reply. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 19:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, with his recent ban, I don't think there will be any more trouble from the great Christian sockmaster, until he gets a new account, that is. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 18:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Haunted Angel I dont like to bring it up, but his personal history may not have been false. You see I was also a teenage parent when I was 15, and I married when I was 17 (not my babys mother, though). I had a second child by the time I was 19 (how old he claims he is). So it is not unlikely. Of course unlike him I dont claim to have traveled half the globe, in fact I have only left Scotland (my home) twice both times I went to London. Still I say we just let it rest. He has been banned forever and he cant bother anymore. I was thinking could we not start an article about him and all he done? It would be intresting. Stralia 18:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Forgive me for my random accusations, but somehow I get the feeling I'm talking to the same person here. So, no. Please please do not post here unless it has a relevant topic, I do not wish to discuss the Christian vandals, and please forgive by incredible harshness. FYI, I'm gonna' put out a Check User on you. Even if you're not who I heavilly suspect you are, it's better to be aware and wrong rather then naïve and ignorant. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 21:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Haunted Angel you can see my I.P. which is 74.195.132.34 on my list I prepared for you. I was the one who told you who American Brit was. But I dont blame you for being suspecious I would do after learning I was decieved for months. And I am sorry if I upset you with my previous post. I wont post here unless it is relevant. I am new to Wikipedia and I hope we can be friends. Stralia 21:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I have concented to the checkuser. I do understand your reasoning, I also would be suspesious if I were you. Stralia 00:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Good, and there is no "concenting" to it, it is simply done. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 01:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I am aware of that I would just saying I approve. I do understand why you wondered if I was a sockk puppet, no offense was taken. Also I am not in any place called Texas, I dont even know where the Hell that is. I am in Scotland. Why would I live about my location? But you see the results of the checkuser report. One more thing my first edit was not on your user page. It was my first edit under my account name. I have edited under I.P. for over a year. Stralia 02:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I looked it up on Wikipedia. Texas is one of the United States. Sorry for being rude above about that. I dont know much about the USA. Stralia 02:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunatly, as you can see under the check user, your IP clearly goes back to Texas. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 10:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Well it's no surprise that Stralia "knew from day one" that American Brit was the sockmaster; they were sitting in the same chair all along. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 23:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, to be fair, it would be awfully silly if he didn't know that he was himself. :-) EVula // talk // ☯ // 00:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Ugh, pathetic. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 15:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Brit Is Innocent

Recently I read this argument. I really think American Brit is innocent. You should all consider allowing him to be unblocked. American Brit is really a good guy. He did no wrong, so lets all revote to have him unbanned. OldIreTea 21:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Brit. Please stop trollling. --Majorly (talk) 21:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Brit? Why I am not Bret. I am just saying he is innocent. You see I beleive him. But no I am not Brit. Majorly I will report you if you start this OldIreTea 21:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

How come you were reading a talk page? And you just joined today! You see, everyone except Brit knows of his guilt. Please do report me, I'd like some drama. --Majorly (talk) 22:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh bloody hell. OldIreTea, please shut up. If you arn't Brit, then I would say you are one of his personal friends who is in on this. Either way, please shut up. It's been undisputably proven he is (you are) guilty. Leave it be. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 22:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

You are all headed to Hell for this. All of you. I and American Brit are innocent. We will kill you all. OldIreTea 22:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm

Awfully hard to send you an off-wiki email if you've got no email specified. ;-) EVula // talk // ☯ // 03:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought I'd set it up, but apparently I hadn't. Done now though ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 09:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Left Hand Path work group is now active

You were one of the parties who indicated an interest in the Left Hand Path group on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals page. The project is now active at Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion/Left Hand Path work group, and all the names from the proposed project page have been transferred to the new active page. Badbilltucker 19:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks dude, I'll check in on that soon! ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 21:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Apologies

Hey, don't worry about it; like you said, we never stop learning. It's true wisdom to understand that fact :) Cheers! -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 23:49, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Battlefront III, perhaps it would be best to AfD this article. That seems to me the most reasonable thing to do, given the complete lack of information we have on it. Personally, I tend to believe those articles that were originally introduced, but I'd be just as happy to have the article removed and wait for more concrete evidence. What say you? -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 18:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I couldn't agree more -- I watched a week or so ago, someone nominated it for speedy deletion, but it never actually was deleted. If it's nominated for deletion, you have my vote. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 19:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Taven Trivia

Excuse Me, I hate to take the time of a busy editor, but exactaly while do you keep removing that fact on the trivia section of Taven. I acutally think it is intresting and very informative. Edge865 [[Wikipedian Through And Through]] 21:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Another American Brit? Check contributions and userpage. --Majorly 21:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

What? I am talking about the page Taven in which HA removed a trivia fact. I think it is informative. I never knew that about Mortal Kombat and played it for so long. Anyway I am not starting anything I was just wandering why he removed it after I restored it. Edge865 [[Wikipedian Through And Through]] 21:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm gonna have to side with THA on this one; it is a very minor fact, and isn't really trivia. If it should appear anywhere, it would on the Konquest page as an aside. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Almost certainly -- I will put out a UC for Edge in a few moments. As for the Trivia edge, mentioning that he has no relics in Konquest mode is barely trivia -- see the edit summary I made. As far as information for an encyclopedia goes, this was completly irrelevant. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 21:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Why is it irrelevant? Edge865 [[Wikipedian Through And Through]] 22:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Forgive the paradox of sarcasm here; but because it has no relevance. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 22:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Well okay Edge865 [[Wikipedian Through And Through]] 22:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

And the award for "most recent addition to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of American Brit" goes to Edge865. Congratulations! EVula // talk // ☯ // 01:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

YAY!!! <pointlessly celebrates> --Majorly 01:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Woooo! ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 09:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Possible misunderstanding?

Dear Sir/Madame: Several minutes ago (while I was not logged in) I received a message from you reporting that some "testing" of mine had been reverted and that I should keep that sort of thing in the sandbox. I completely agree and would never vandalize an article; I love Wikipedia and find the idea of breaking it quite repulsive. Therefore it would appear that you made a mistake or perhaps just thought it would be funny to make such a claim. In the first scenario no harm has been done but if the intent was malicious I find such behavior unacceptable.

It is perhaps worthy of note that you are a Cradle of Filth fan (I rather enjoy them myself.) I believe that I have edited either the Cradle of Filth article or one of the band members' pages at some point, but the edit was of course not vandalization. Could this have led to some manner of misunderstanding? Radical25 20:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I cannot find nor recall the template I sent you about the aparrent vandalism, but I do send out a lot of templates. The temlate couldn't have been sent to your Radical25 account, as your talk page has not yet been posted in. Another point of interest is that I have not sent out any test templates today (yesterday I may have), all I have done today is put a good few articles up for speedy deletion, and as such I am having trouble remembering why exactly (and where) I gave you a warning template. If you could find the talk page where I gave you the template (feel free to look through my contributions for help) and let me know, I'll tell you why I gave the template; if it was an honest misunderstanding, you have my apologies -- believe me, I wouldn't give out a warning to someone because I "found it funny". ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 21:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

As I am in a public institution at the moment (hence my initial logged-out status) it was probably another user's edit to which you objected. I'm glad to have cleared this issue up.

Radical25 21:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Ah yes, that's a problem I should really have considered earlier. Ah well, as long as it's sorted ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 22:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Sorry for interrupting angel, but I appreciate your help on the article. The Medician

No problem ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 22:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, dude

Thanks for cleaning up my Warriors page, it was pretty darn crappy. S.L. out! --SpottedLeaf 01:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

No probs! ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 12:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Have We Made a Mistake

Kind of. About 50%! On further investigation it's obviously wrong to say that the Samhain version predates the Misfits one, BUT Cradle are on record as calling it a Samhain cover. Also, it sounds as if the 12 Hits From Hell version is basically a demo, which Danzig then re-recorded and polished for the Samhain version. So it's basically a Glen Danzig song that he used twice: prototype with Misfits and finished version with Samhain. I reckon we leave the list as it is, but I've changed the "leave this alone" request so that it's accurate and explains why better. Cradle never cover the same band twice - you noticed that? Good rule of thumb. Cardinal Wurzel 11:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Victor Abiamiri

Can you please take the deletion tag off my article about Victor Abiamiri. I just started the article and was going to extend it more,but before i had a chance you put the deletion tag on it.--Bucs10 16:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Bucs10

I am just saying you put the tag on before i even had a chance to extend it--Bucs10 16:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Bucs10

If you read the deletion tag, you will see you can postpone the article's speedy deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the article, without removing the tag itself. Add it below, then add whatever you want to add, and if it's enough to make the article relevant, it will remain.

That's the point in the word 'speedy' deletion. If you don't want the tag on that quickly you should create a user sub page where you can write the article on there and then C+P it all into the article proper. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 23:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)