User talk:Pburka

Nomination of Wayne State University College of Fine, Performing, and Communication Arts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wayne State University College of Fine, Performing, and Communication Arts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne State University College of Fine, Performing, and Communication Arts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ElKevbo (talk) 04:30, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2022

Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239 Online events: New: Alphabet run: C and D | Indigenous women | Refugees | Comedians, Comics and other Performers Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration focus on UEFA Women's Euro 2022, August 8–21 Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022

Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241 Online events: New: Alphabet run: E and F | Women writers and their works Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Request for help: Participate in preparations for our trend-setting contest in November Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022

Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244 Online events: New: Alphabet run: G and H | Women in STEM / Ada Lovelace Day | Geofocus West Asia Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Green's "Wildcard Edition" Good Article editathon Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

WW2

Jack Shearer, who is the last member of the Sino American Cooperative Organization, died August 28th, of this year 2022, just hope you write it down soon ButlerAlexander (talk) 21:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Please place comments in the talk page of the list. You'll get a better response if you explain what you want changed instead of just listing names with little context. pburka (talk) 21:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

≤·== "Book reviews are easily found" ==

You removed the PROD with the claim that "book reviews are easily found" but I found no such reviews at a level that meets WP:AUTHOR; what reviews are you referring to? - Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

For example, Kirkus Reviews published reviews of 12 of her books[1] and Publishers Weekly reviewed another 10[2]. These are probably the two most respected sources for book reviews in the United States, so I looked no further before removing the PROD. Since she writes children's literature you might expect to find more in School Library Journal[3] or the Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books[4]. This is an easy pass of WP:NAUTHOR#3 and would never be a non-controversial deletion. pburka (talk) 00:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

I'm going to have to strongly disagree with your reading of WP:NAUTHOR #3, which does not say that reviews are sufficient reason. It says that the review criteria is in addition to the primary criteria: has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. That hasn't even been hinted at being true, so even with these reviews you added, the author fails WP:NAUTHOR, even criteria #3. Books get reviewed, this does not indicate notability for its author and if this is the best claim to notability then it needs to go to AfD. - Aoidh (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome to disagree by taking it to AfD, but it was a highly inappropriate prod. pburka (talk) 00:27, 4 October 2022 (UTC)