Talk:Boeing 777: Difference between revisions
Revert vague, test like post by 89.205.140.240 (talk) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
* [[commons:File:Air India One Chennai.png|Air India One Chennai.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-12-16T13:12:56.154903 | Air India One Chennai.png --> |
* [[commons:File:Air India One Chennai.png|Air India One Chennai.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-12-16T13:12:56.154903 | Air India One Chennai.png --> |
||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Air India One Chennai.png|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 13:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Air India One Chennai.png|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 13:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
==[[WP:URFA/2020]]== |
|||
The references O_D_summ, 777_O_D_summ, and BoeingOD are invoked but never defined. I couldn't find them in previous versions of the pages in 2022 and 2021. [[User:A455bcd9|A455bcd9]] ([[User talk:A455bcd9|talk]]) 14:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:24, 9 December 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boeing 777 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 240 days |
Boeing 777 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 12, 2012. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aviation: Aircraft FA‑class | |||||||||||||
|
There is a request, submitted by Sp33dyphil Ready • to • Rumble , for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "This is a featured article on a popular and well-known aircraft.". |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Reorder the US feet/miles/pounds to the metrical system, please
How can this article be considered "good" if the units are given American-only first, and then the metric? Please, reorder them, this is a disgrace to any international reader on Earth.--Adûnâi (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- This is a US product and US customary units are primary. See the manufacturer's spec data for example. Also this is why unit conversions are listed. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Denver Engine Failure
The current Denver engine failure is relevant. The aircraft has been grounded in multiple countries, zo I will had appropriate links shortly. Carandol (talk) 08:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
I've taken the word 'Uncontained' out for now. As per NTSB it has a specific meaning within the industry that this doesn't appear to match though clearly it's an ugly failure with stuff all over the place. Happy to revisit that as either the definition moves or more info becomes available. Skenu (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC) [1]
References
- ^ Reuters Attribution. Aero.UK https://www.aero.uk/news-38776/Damage-to-engine-consistent-with-metal-fatigue.html. Retrieved 23 February 2021.
{{cite web}}
:|last1=
has generic name (help); Missing or empty|title=
(help)
GE90-94B
max TO thrust of GE90-94B is 97,300 lbf (433 kN)[1] . The value in specifications is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.76.218.195 (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
77L (700-200LR)
The article states "It has a maximum design range of 8,555 nautical miles (15,844 km) as of 2017.", isn't the maximum design range according to Boeing 17,205 kilometres (with 314 pax) (cite: https://www.boeing.co.kr/resources/ko_KR/Seoul-International/BCA/777-300ER-200LR.pdf )? As the "maximum design range" actually employs all 3 auxiliary fuel tanks in Center Aft (displacing cargo space). While I don't believe there is evidence of any of the operators currently keeping their tanks installed/using them as the range of the 77L is just so massive without them that they are uneconomical to sacrifice cargo space for further unneeded range. (Cited as one of the potential reasons why the type didn't have further success, even after not being chosen for SIN-EWR route). And while Boeing's current public website indeed cites the range without the auxillary tanks (I presume to make the type more marketable/reflect a more common configuration), the design of the aircraft & even Boeing's Fuel Management System are all built for the Auxiliary tanks if desired ( https://studylib.net/doc/8775156/b777-fuel---smartcockpit ). It also would make sense to cite the range of "17,205 km" as the previous cited facts in the article (connecting almost any two airports),setting the world record for flight, both would require keeping those tanks installed.
What are people's thoughts? As this is a very active article, I didn't want to make this change without discussion! DigitalExpat (talk) 07:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
References
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The references O_D_summ, 777_O_D_summ, and BoeingOD are invoked but never defined. I couldn't find them in previous versions of the pages in 2022 and 2021. A455bcd9 (talk) 14:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class aviation articles
- FA-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- Successful requests for aviation A-Class status
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Spoken Wikipedia requests
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report