Jump to content

User talk:QuackGuru: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Zork (talk | contribs)
→‎User page: why must i always forget my signage
Off topic discussion at Talk:Essjay controversy
Line 146: Line 146:


[[User:Zork|Zork]] 21:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[[User:Zork|Zork]] 21:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

== Off topic discussion at [[Talk:Essjay controversy]] ==

I'm not sure if you have read the complaints about your conduct at the above talk page, but I would like to remind you that repeatedly bringing up unrelated topics to the talk page is disruptive, as it prevents editors from focusing on the subject of the article. We have asked you to bring the issue up to the relevant articles. Please take our advice as these posts are trying the community's patience. Further disruption may cause further action against your account. --[[User:WikiLeon|<font color="#cc0000">w</font><font color="#00cc00"><sup>L</sup></font>]]<sup>&lt;[[User talk:WikiLeon|speak]]&middot;[[Special:Contributions/WikiLeon|check]]&gt;</sup> 06:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:44, 1 April 2007

The following topic is a comparison of Citizendium versus Wikipedia.

Wikipedia relies exclusively on consensus from the community, which can and does change rapidly according to which users are giving a matter attention. While Citizendium incorporates consensus during the authoring of articles, it also has a body of experts in their respective fields to help author and finally, approve articles.

  1. Bergstein, Brian (March 25, 2007). "Citizendium aims to be better Wikipedia". Associated Press. USA Today. Retrieved 2007-03-25. This week, Sanger takes the wraps off a Wikipedia alternative, Citizendium. His goal is to capture Wikipedia's bustle but this time, avoid the vandalism and inconsistency that are its pitfalls. — Brian Bergstein.

{{Wikipedia-stub}} {{Wikipediahistory}}

[[Category:Online encyclopedias]]


Sources

Primary sources
News sources
February 28 2007
March 1 2007
March 2 2007
March 5 2007
March 6 2007
March 7 2007
March 8, 2007
March 9, 2007
March 11, 2007
Audio and video
External links
Internal links
  • Essjay's response in his own words on his talk page at 16:06, March 1, 2007, Wikipedian time. My response. Retrieved on 2007-03-15.
Blogs

Here is a list I collected for research purposes. Happy reading. :) - Mr.Guru (talk/contribs) 05:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Hey, I noticed you don't have a User Page up. Since you've been doing a lot of editing recently, it's a good idea to just slip a few words in about yourself so people don't get confused.

Zork 21:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Off topic discussion at Talk:Essjay controversy

I'm not sure if you have read the complaints about your conduct at the above talk page, but I would like to remind you that repeatedly bringing up unrelated topics to the talk page is disruptive, as it prevents editors from focusing on the subject of the article. We have asked you to bring the issue up to the relevant articles. Please take our advice as these posts are trying the community's patience. Further disruption may cause further action against your account. --wL<speak·check> 06:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]