Parapsychology

Parapsychology is the study of evidence for "paranormal psychological phenomena" such as telepathy, clairvoyance, and psychokinesis (Parapsychology, n.d.). The Parapsychological Association describes parapsychology as "the scientific study of paranormal or ostensibly paranormal phenomena, that is, psi; except in Britain, the term has largely superseded the older expression 'psychical research;' used by some to refer to the experimental approach to the field" (Glossary, n.d.).

Proponents style parapsychology as a discipline compatible with science and other schools of psychology, however those assertions and the results of parapsychological work have met with frequent opposition from critics (Odling-Smee, 2007). Historically, however, psychical research has attracted notable personalities in psychology, such as American psychologist and philosopher William James, among others.

Many scientists feel that parapsychological study is at best on the outer edges of science because it involves research that doesn't fit within standard theoretical models accepted by mainstream science. A large portion of parapsychological work involves examining the statistical evidence for psi, a generic term described by parapsychologists as indicating anomalies that may be attributed to paranormal phenomena. An article published in the February 2007 issue of Nature characterized the "decision whether to pursue a tiny apparent effect or put it down to statistical flaws [as] a subjective one" (Odling-Smee, 2007). The controversy over parapsychological study is an example of the larger debate over the demarcation problem in science, which examines the boundaries commonly drawn between science and non-science. To date there have been no experimental results that have gained wide acceptance in the scientific community as valid evidence of paranormal phenomena (Odling-Smee, 2007).

History

Parapsychology was coined in or before 1889 by psychologist Max Dessoir. It was later popularized by J.B. Rhine as a replacement for the earlier term "psychical research," and to indicate a significant shift in methodologies applied to the study of psychic or paranormal phenomena (Melton 1996).

Early psychical research

American psychologist and philosopher William James (1842-1910) was an early psychical researcher.

The Society for Psychical Research (SPR), was founded in London in 1882. The SPR was the first systematic effort to organize scientists and scholars for a critical and sustained investigation of paranormal phenomena. The early membership of the SPR included philosophers, scholars, scientists, educators and politicians of the day, such as Henry Sidgwick, Arthur Balfour, William Crookes, and Charles Richet(Beloff, 1977).

The SPR classified its subjects of study into several areas: telepathy, hypnotism, Reichenbach's phenomena, apparitions, haunts, and the physical phenomena of Spiritualism such as table-tilting and materializations. One of the first collaborative efforts of the SPR was its Census of Hallucinations, which researched apparitional experiences and hallucinations in the sane. The census was the Society's first attempt at a statistical evaluation of spontaneous cases of paranormal phenomena, and the resulting publication, Phantasms of the Living (1886) is still widely referenced in the parapsychological literature today. The SPR became the model for similar societies in other European countries during the late 19th century, such as those in France, Germany, and Poland. Largely due to the support of William James, the American Society for Psychical Research (ASPR) opened its doors in New York City in 1885 (Berger & Berger, 1991).

Today, the SPR and ASPR continues its investigations into anomalous phenomena. The SPR's purpose, as stated in every issue of its Journal is "to examine without prejudice or prepossession and in a scientific spirit those faculties of man, real or supposed, which appear to be inexplicable on any generally recognized hypothesis."

The Rhine era

In 1911, Stanford University became the first academic institution in the United States to study ESP and PK in a laboratory setting. The effort was headed by psychologist John Edgar Coover. In 1930, Duke University became the second major US academic institution to engage in the critical study of ESP and PK in the laboratory. Under the guidance of William McDougall, and with the help of others in the department, including Karl Zener, Joseph B. Rhine and Louisa E. Rhine, ESP experiments in the laboratory and in buildings on campus began, using volunteer subjects from the undergraduate student body. As opposed to the approaches of psychical research, which generally sought qualitative evidence for paranormal phenomena, the experiments at Duke University proffered a quantitative, statistical approach using cards and dice. As a consequence of the ESP experiments at Duke, standard laboratory procedures for the testing of ESP evolved and came to be adopted by interested researchers throughout the world (Berger & Berger 1991).

The publication of J.B. Rhine's book, New Frontiers of the Mind (1937), brought the laboratory's findings to the general public. In his book, Rhine established and popularized the word "parapsychology," which Max Dessoir had coined over forty years earlier, to describe the research conducted at Duke. Rhine also founded an autonomous Parapsychology Laboratory within Duke, and started the Journal of Parapsychology, which he co-edited with McDougall.

The parapsychology experiments at Duke evoked much criticism from academic psychologists who challenged the concept and evidence of ESP. Rhine and his colleagues attempted to address these criticisms through new experiments, articles and books, and summarized the state of the criticism along with their responses in the book Extra-Sensory Perception After Sixty Years (1940). The administration of Duke grew less sympathetic to parapsychology, and after Rhine's retirement in 1965, parapsychological links with the university were broken. Rhine later established the Foundation for Research on the Nature of Man (FRNM) and the Institute for Parapsychology as a successor to the Duke laboratory (Berger & Berger 1991). In 1995, the centenary of Rhine's birth, the FRNM was renamed the Rhine Research Center.

Establishment of the Parapsychological Association

The Parapsychological Association (PA) was created in Durham, North Carolina, on June 19th, 1957. Its formation was proposed by J. B. Rhine at a workshop on parapsychology, which was held at the Parapsychology Laboratory of Duke University. Rhine proposed that the group form itself into the nucleus of an international professional society in parapsychology. The aim of the organization, as stated in its Constitution became "to advance parapsychology as a science, to disseminate knowledge of the field, and to integrate the findings with those of other branches of science" (History, n.d.). In 1969 the PA was elected an affiliate of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the largest general scientific society in the world. The PA consists of about three hundred full, associate and affiliated members worldwide, and maintains its affiliation with the AAAS today. The annual AAAS convention provides parapsychologists with a forum for presenting their research to scientists from other fields and for advancing parapsychology in the context of the AAAS's lobbying on national science policy (Irwin & Watt 2007: 308).

A decade of increased research (1970s)

The affiliation of the Parapsychological Association (PA) with the American Association for the Advancement of Science, along with a general openness to psychic and occult phenomena in the 1970s, led to a decade of increased parapsychological research. During this period, other notable organizations were also formed, including the Academy of Parapsychology and Medicine (1970), the Institute of Parascience (1971), the Academy of Religion and Psychical Research, the Institute of Noetic Sciences (1973), the International Kirlian Research Association (1975), and the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Laboratory (1979). Parapsychological work was also conducted at the Stanford Research Institute during this time (Melton 1996).

The scope of parapsychology expanded during these years. Ian Stevenson conducted much of his controversial research into reincarnation during the 1970s. Thelma Moss devoted time to the study of Kirlian photography at UCLA's parapsychology laboratory. The influx of spiritual teachers from the East, and their claims of abilities produced by meditation, led to research on altered states of consciousness. Russell Targ introduced the term remote viewing in 1974 (Melton 1996).

During this period, academics outside parapsychology also appeared to have a general optimism towards this research. In 1979, a survey of more than 1,100 college professors in the United States found that only 2% of psychologists expressed the belief that extra-sensory perception was an impossibility. A far greater amount, 34%, indicated that they believed ESP was either an established fact or a likely possibility. The percentage was even higher in other areas of study. 55% of natural scientists, 66% of social scientists (excluding psychologists), and 77% of academics in the arts, humanities, and education believed that ESP research was worthwhile (Wagner & Monnet, 1979).

The surge in paranormal research continued throughout the 1970s and into the 1980s. By the end of the 1980s the Parapsychological Association reported some 300 members working in more than 30 countries. Additionally, research not affiliated with the PA was being carried out in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union (Melton 1996).

Parapsychology today

Despite the surge of interest in the 1970s, contemporary parapsychological research has waned considerably. Early research was considered at best inconclusive, and parapsychologists found themselves faced with strong opposition from their academic colleagues. Some effects thought to be paranormal, for example the effects of Kirlian photography, disappeared under more stringent controls, leaving new avenues of research at dead-ends. Many university labs in the United States have closed, citing a lack of acceptance by mainstream science as the reason, leaving the bulk of parapsychology confined to private institutions funded by philanthropic sources (Melton 1996). Other laboratories, notably the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Laboratory (PEAR), closed feeling they had accomplished their goal of proving the existence of parapsychological effects, despite the lack of acceptance by mainstream scientists. PEAR ended its active research in February 2007, having performed tens of millions of trials over 28 years (Odling-Smee, 2007).

Parapsychology hasn't disappeared, however. The Parapsychological Association (PA) remains affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Two universities in the United States have academic parapsychology laboratories: the Division of Perceptual Studies, a unit at the University of Virginia's Department of Psychiatric Medicine, studies phenomena suggestive of the survival of consciousness after bodily death; the University of Arizona's Veritas Laboratory conducts laboratory investigations of mediums. Several private institutions, including the Institute of Noetic Sciences and others, conduct and promote parapsychological research. Outside the United States, the field is more active. Britain leads parapsychological study in Europe, with privately funded labs at the universities of Edinburgh, Northampton and Liverpool Hope, among others (Odling-Smee, 2007).

Parapsychology has also been absorbed into other fields of psychology. These related fields include transpersonal psychology, which studies transcendent or spiritual aspects of the human mind, and anomalistic psychology, which examines paranormal beliefs and subjective anomalous experiences in traditional psychological terms (Cardeña et al., 2000; Tart, 2002; Odling-Smee, 2007).

Research

Early parapsychological research employed the use of Zener cards in experiments designed to test for possible telepathic communication.

See also Criticism

Scope

Contemporary parapsychologists study a number of ostensible paranormal phenomena, including: Telepathy, Precognition, Clairvoyance, Extra-sensory perception, Psychokinesis, Bio-PK, Near death experiences, Out-of-body experiences, Reincarnation, Hauntings, Poltergeists, and Psi (FAQ, n.d.).

According to the Parapsychological Association, parapsychologists do not do not study all paranormal phenomena, nor are they concerned with astrology, UFOs, Bigfoot, paganism, vampires, alchemy, or witchcraft (FAQ, n.d.).

Methodology

Parapsychologists employ a variety of approaches to the study of psi, a generic term described by parapsychologists as indicating anomalies that may be attributed to paranormal phenomena. These methods include qualitative approaches used in traditional psychology, but also quantitative empirical methodologies. Their more controversial studies involve the use of meta-analyses in examining the statistical evidence for psi (Odling-Smee, 2007).

Experimental research

Ganzfeld

Main article: Ganzfeld experiment

The ganzfeld (German for "whole field") is a technique used to test individuals for telepathy. The technique was developed to quickly quiet mental "noise" by providing a mild, unpatterned sensory field to mask the visual and auditory environment. Isolating the visual sense is usually achieved by creating a soft red glow which is diffused through half ping-pong balls attached to the recipient's eyes. The auditory sense is usually blocked by playing white noise, static, or similar sounds to the recipient. The subject is also seated in a reclined comfortable position to minimize the sense of touch.

Participant of a Ganzfeld experiment which proponents say may show evidence of telepathy.

In the typical ganzfeld experiment, a "sender" and "receiver" are isolated, the receiver is put into the ganzfeld state, and the sender is shown a video clip or still picture and asked to mentally send that image to the receiver. The receiver, while in the ganzfeld, is asked to continuously speak aloud all mental processes, including images, thoughts, feelings. At the end of the sending period, typically about 20 to 40 minutes in length, the receiver is taken out of the ganzfeld and shown four images or videos, one of which is the true target and three are non-target decoys. The receiver attempts to select the true target, using perceptions experienced during the ganzfeld state as clues to what the mentally "sent" image might have been.

Chance expectation predicts that the correct target would be selected about 1 in 4 times, for a 25% "hit rate." The results of scores of such experiments, and over 3,000 individual sessions conducted by about two dozen investigators world-wide, have been interpreted by investigators as indicating that the target image is selected on average about 32% of the time (Radin 2006). Because the results are statistically significant as interpreted, they have sparked debates within mainstream academic psychology in the journals Psychological Bulletin (Bem & Honorton 1994) and The Humanistic Psychologist (Delgado-Romero & Howard, 2005) over how to interpret the data.

Remote viewing

Main article: Remote viewing

Remote viewing experiments test the ability to gather information on a remote target consisting of an object, place, or person, etc., that is hidden from the physical perception of the viewer and typically separated from the viewer at some distance. In one type of remote viewing experiment, a pool of several hundred photographs are created. One of these is randomly selected by a third party to be the target. It is then set aside in a remote location. The remote viewer attempts to sketch or otherwise describe that remote target photo. This procedure is repeated for a number of different targets. Many ways of analytically evaluating the results of this sort of experiment have been developed. One common method is to take the group of seven target photos and responses, randomly shuffle the targets and responses, and then ask independent judges to rank order or match the correct targets with the participant's actual responses. This method assumes that if there were an anomalous transfer of information, the responses should correspond more closely to the correct targets than to the mismatched targets (Dunne & Jahn 2003).

Several hundred such trials have been conducted by investigators over the past 25 years, including by the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Laboratory (PEAR) and by scientists at SRI International and Science Applications International Corp., under contract by the US government. The cumulative data was interpreted by researchers as indicating that information about remote photos, actual scenes, and events can be perceived beyond chance expectation (Dunne & Jahn 2003).

Psychokinesis on random number generators

Main article: Psychokinesis

The advent of powerful and inexpensive electronic and computer technologies has allowed the development of fully automated experiments studying possible interactions between mind and matter. In the most common experiment of this type, a Random Number Generator (RNG), based on electronic or radioactive noise, produces a data stream that is recorded and analyzed by computer software. A subject attempts to mentally alter the distribution of the random numbers, usually in an experimental design that is functionally equivalent to getting more "heads" than "tails" while flipping a coin. In the RNG experiment, design flexibility can be combined with rigorous controls, while collecting a large amount of data in very short period of time. This technique has been used both to test individuals for psychokinesis and to test the possible influence on RNGs of large groups of people (Jahn & Dunne, 1986).

Major meta-analyses of the RNG database have been published every few years since appearing in the journal Foundations of Physics in 1986 (Jahn & Dunne, 1986). Researchers say that the effect size in all cases was found to be very small, but consistent across time and experimental designs, resulting in an overall statistical significance. The most recent meta-analysis was published in Psychological Bulletin, along with several critical commentaries (Bosch et al, 2006; Radin et al, 2006). The meta-analysis was comprised of 380 studies, which researchers say has produced an overall effect size that was very small but statistically significant.

Direct mental influence on living systems

This experimental domain was previously called "bio-PK." More recently, researchers refer to it as 'direct mental interactions with living systems' (DMILS). It studies the effects of one person's intentions on a distant person's psychophysiological state. One type of DMILS experiment looks at the commonly reported "feeling of being stared at." The "starer" and the "staree" are isolated in different locations, and the starer is periodically asked to simply gaze at the staree via closed circuit video links. Meanwhile the staree's nervous system activity is automatically and continuously monitored.

Parapsychologists have interpreted the cumulative data on this and similar DMILS experiments to suggest that one person's attention directed towards a remote, isolated person, can significantly activate or calm that person's nervous system. In a meta-analysis of these experiments published in the British Journal of Psychology in 2004, researchers found that overall there was a small, but significant DMILS effect. However, the study also found that when a small number of the highest quality studies from one lab were analyzed, the effect size was not significant. The authors concluded that although the existence of some anomaly related to distant intentions cannot be ruled out, there was also a shortage of independent replications and theoretical concepts (Schmidt et al. 2004).

Survival Research

Near death experiences

Main article: Near-death experience

A near-death experience (NDE) is an experience reported by a person who nearly died, or who experienced clinical death and then revived. NDEs include one or more of the following experiences: A sense of being dead; an out-of-body experience; a sensation of floating above one's body and seeing the surrounding area; a sense of overwhelming love and peace; a sensation of moving upwards through a tunnel or narrow passageway; meeting deceased relatives or spiritual figures; encountering a being of light, or a light; experiencing a life review; reaching a border or boundary; and a feeling of being returned to the body, often accompanied by reluctance (Mauro, 1992).

Interest in the NDE was originally spurred by the research of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, George Ritchie, and Raymond Moody Jr. Moody's book Life after Life (1995) brought a great deal of attention to the topic of NDEs. The International Association for Near-death Studies (IANDS) was founded in 1978 in order to meet the needs of early researchers and experiencers within this field of research. Later researchers, such as Bruce Greyson, Kenneth Ring and Michael Sabom, introduced the study of Near-death experiences to the academic setting (Mauro, 1992).

Anomalous Psychology

A number of studies conducted in the American, European, and Australasian continents have found that a majority of people surveyed report having had experiences that could be interpreted as telepathy, precognition, and similar phenomena (Targ, Schlitz, & Irwin, 2000). Variables than have been associated with reports of psi-phenomena include belief in the reality of psi, the tendency to have hypnotic, dissociative, and other alterations of consciousness, and, less reliably so, neuroticism, extraversion, and openness to experience (Cardeña, Lynn, & Krippner, 2000). Although psi-related experiences can occur in the context of such psychopathologies as schizotypal personality, dissociative, and other disorders, research has shown that most individuals who endorse a belief in psi are well-adjusted, lack serious pathology, and are not intellectually deficient or lack critical abilities (Targ, Schlitz, & Irwin, 2000).

Criticism

Critics of parapsychology question the field's status, arguing that the work is unscientific, partly because it lacks a framework within accepted scientific models, and partly because after decades of research it hasn't presented evidence that they say provides conclusive results (Odling-Smee, 2007).

Controversy over scientific status

The scientific reality of parapsychological phenomena and the validity of parapsychological research is a matter of continued criticism. The methods of parapsychologists are regarded by some critics as a pseudoscience (Beyerstein 1996; Stenger 2002). Some of the more specific criticisms, as addressed by James E. Alcock (1981, 2003), state that parapsychology does not have a clearly defined subject matter, an easily "repeatable" experiment that can demonstrate a psi effect on demand, nor an underlying theory to explain the paranormal transfer of information. Additionally, Alcock said that few of parapsychology's experimental results have prompted interdisciplinary research with more mainstream sciences such as physics or biology. Alcock states that parapsychology remains an isolated science to such an extent that its very legitimacy is questionable.

Controversy over experimental results

Although some critics feel that parapsychological study is scientific, they are not satisfied with its experimental results (Alcock 2003, Hyman 1995, Randi 2003). Critics contend that apparently successful experimental results in psi research are more likely due to sloppy procedures, poorly trained researchers, or methodological flaws than to genuine psi effects. For example, critics have said that parapsychologists misuse meta-analysis to create the incorrect impression that statistically significant results which indicate psi phenomena have been obtained (Stenger, 2002, Stokes, 2001).

Selection bias

Selective reporting has also been offered by critics as an explanation for the results of psi research. This is sometimes referred to as a "file drawer" problem. A "file drawer" problem arises when only positive study results are made public, while studies with negative or null results are not made public (Radin 2006). A recent meta-analysis (Bosch et al, 2006) combined 380 studies on psychokinesis, including data from the PEAR lab. It concluded that although there is a statistically significant overall effect, it is not consistent and relatively few negative studies would cancel it out, so biased publication of positive results could be the cause (Odling-Smee, 2007).

Psi assumption

Parapsychologists often cite a statisical deviation from chance in their experiments as evidence for psi phenomena. Critics point out that any statistical deviation from chance is, strictly speaking, only evidence that there was a rare, statistically unlikely occurrence that happened by chance, or that something else was causing the deviation from chance. Assuming that something paranormal is occuring when other normal processes could account for the effect is considered a logical fallacy (Carroll, n.d.).

Fraud

James Randi is a well-known critic of parapsychology and feels that magic tricks can account for what appears to be psychic phenomena.

There have been instances of fraud in the history of parapsychology research. Soal-Goldney experiments of 1941-43 (suggesting precognitive ability in subjects) were long regarded as some of the best in the field because they relied upon independent checking and witnesses to prevent fraud. However, many years later suspicions of fraud were apparently confirmed when statistical evidence, uncovered and published by other parapsychologists in the field, suggested that Dr. Soal had cheated by altering the raw data (Scott and Haskell, 1973, Alcock, 1981, Markwick, 1978). Another parapsychologist, Walter J. Levi, Jr.'s also falsified experimental results. He was caught by J.B. Rhine and asked to step down from his position as director for the Institute for Parapsychology (Hansen, 2001:323).

No scientific field is immune to instances of fraud or deception by its researchers. However, parapsychologists have to be especially alert to deception on the part of their subjects. Fraud undoubtedly played a part in creating the positive reputations of Spiritualist mediums who were caught in the act of cheating. In the 1920s, magician and escapologist Harry Houdini said that researchers and observers could not create experimental procedures which absolutely preclude fraud (Houdini, 1924). In 1979, magician and debunker James Randi perpetrated a hoax, now famously referred to as Project Alpha. Randi trained two young magicians and sent them under cover to Washington University's McDonnell Laboratory with the specific aim of exposing poor experimental methods and credulity thought to be common in parapsychology. Although no formal statements or publications from the McDonnell laboratory supported the likelihood that the effects demonstrated by the two magicians were genuine, both of Randi's trainees reportedly deceived experimenters over a period of four years with demonstrations of supposedly telekenetic metal bending (Randi, 1983). Such methodological failures have been cited as evidence that most, if not all, extraordinary results in parapsychology derive from error or fraud.

Laboratories, organizations and journals

North America

There are two academic laboratories devoted to parapsychological studies in the United States. The Division of Perceptual Studies, a unit at the University of Virginia's Department of Psychiatric Medicine, studies phenomena suggestive of the survival of consciousness after bodily death. The University of Arizona's Veritas Laboratory conducts laboratory investigations of mediums.

North America is also home to several research organizations promoting parapsychological research, such as the American Society for Psychical Research and the Parapsychology Foundation in New York City, the Instituto de Latinoamericano de Parapsicologia in Queretaro, Mexico, The International Association for Near Death Studies in Connecticut, the Rhine Research Center in Durham, North Carolina, the International Academy of Consciousness, and the Society for Scientific Exploration, with officers throughout the U.S.

The major parapsychological journals that are published in North America are Journal of Parapsychology, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, Journal of Conscientiology, Journal of Scientific Exploration, and International Journal of Parapsychology. Other North American journals that have published articles on parapsychological topics include Psychological Bulletin, The Humanistic Psychologist, Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Alternative Therapies, Behavioral and Brain Science, Science, and Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.

See also

• Anomalous phenomenon
• Clairvoyance
• Committee for Skeptical Inquiry
• Extra-sensory perception
• Ganzfeld experiment

• Haunting
• List of parapsychologists
• List of spirituality-related topics
• Near-death experience
• Out-of-body experiences

• Paranormal
• Psychic phenomena
• Prophecy
• Psychokinesis

• Reincarnation
• Remote viewing
• Telepathy
• Transpersonal psychology

References

• Alcock, J. E. (1981). Parapsychology: Science or Magic? Pergamon Press, 140-141

• Alcock, J. E. (2003). Give the null hypothesis a chance. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10. (6-7), 29-50.

• Beloff, J. (1977). Historical overview. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of parapsychology(pp. 3-24). New York, NY: Van Nostrad Reinhold Company.

• Bem, D.J., and Honorton, C. (1994). Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115 (1), 4-18.

• Berger, A., & Berger, J. (1991). Encylcopedia of parapsychology and psychical research. New York, NY: Paragon House.

• Beyerstein, B. L. (1996). Distinguishing Science from Pseudoscience, http://www.sfu.ca/~beyerste/research/articles/02SciencevsPseudoscience.pdf

• Bosch, H., Steinkamp, F., & Boller, E. (2006). Examining psychokinesis: The interaction of human intention with random number generators a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 132(4), July. pp. 497-523.

• Cardeña, E., Lynn, S. J., & Krippner, S. (Eds.) (2000). Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

• Carrol, R. T., Psi Missing. In Skeptic's Dictionary (n.d.). Retrieved June 28, 2007, from http://skepdic.com/psiassumption.html

• Frequently Asked Questions, Parapsychological Association (n.d.). Retrieved May 14, 2007, from http://www.parapsych.org/faq_file1.html

• Delgado-Romero, E.A. & Howard, G.S. (2005). Finding and Correcting Flawed Research Literatures, The Humanistic Psychologist, 33(4), 293–303.

• Dunne, B. J. & Jahn, R. G. (2003). Information and uncertainty in remote perception research, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 17 (2), 207 –241. http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/pdfs/jse_papers/IU.pdf

• Gardner, M. (1981). Science: Good, Bad and Bogus, Prometheus Books, 204-205

• Glossary of Psi, Parapsychological Association (n.d.). Retrieved May 26, 2007, from http://parapsych.org/glossary_l_r.html#p

• Gurney, E., Myers F., and Podmore, F. (1886). Phantasms of the living. London: Society for Psychical Research, Trubner & Co.

• Hansen, G. P. (2001). The Trickster and the Paranormal. Xlibris Corporation.

• History of the Parapsychological Association. (n.d.). Retrieved March 8, 2007, from http://www.parapsych.org/history_of_pa.html.

• Houdini, H. (1924). A Magician Among the Spirits. Harper Bros.

• Hyman, R. (1995). Evaluation of the program on anomalous mental phenomena. Journal of Parapsychology, 59 (4).

• Irwin, H., & Watt, C. (2007). An Introduction to Parapscyhology. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.

• Jahn, R. G., & Dunne, B. J. (1986). On the quantum mechanics of consciousness, with application to anomalous phenomena. Foundations of Physics 16(8), August. pp. 721-772.

• Mauro, J. (1992). Bright lights, big mystery. Psychology Today, July 1992.

• Markwick, B. (1978). The Soal-Goldney experiments with Basil Shackleton: New evidence of data manipulation. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 56, 250-277.

• Melton, J. G. (1966). Parapsychology. In Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology. (1996). Gale Research.

• Moody, R. (1995). Life after Life.

• Odling-Smee, L. (2007). The Lab That Asked The Wrong Questions. Nature, February 2007.

• Parapsychology (n.d.). In Merriam Webster dictionary, Retrieved online May 26, 2007.

• Radin, D. (1997). The conscious universe: the scientific truth of psychic phenomena. San Franciso, CA: Harper.

• Radin, D. (2006). Entangled minds: Extra-sensory experiments in a quantum reality. New York, NY: Paraview Pocket Books.

• Radin, D., Nelson, R., Dobyns, Y., & Houtkooper, J. (2006). Reexamining psychokinesis: Comment on Bosch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006). Psychological Bulletin 132(4), pp. 529-532.

• Randi, J. (1983). The Project Alpha experiment: Part one: the first two years. Skeptical Inquirer, Summer issue.

• Randi, J (2003). No atheists?, psychic rejection in Denmark, psychology vs. parapsychology, 1928 ESP test bombs, a JREF ESP test, and more on Manek. Swift [online], July 18, 2003. Available from: http://www.randi.org/jr/071803.html.

• Rhine, J. B. (1937). New Frontiers of the Mind. New York, NY: Farrar & Rinehart, Inc.

• Rhine, J. B., Pratt J. G., Stuart, C. E., Smirth, B. M., and Greenwood, J.A. (1940). Extra-Sensory Perception after Sixty Years New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co., Inc.

• Schmidt, S., Schneider, R., Utts, J., and Walach H. (2004). Distant intentionality and the feeling of being stared at: Two meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychology, (95), 235-247.

• Scott, C. and Haskell, P. (1973). "Normal" explanation of the Soal-Goldney experiments in extra-sensory perception, Nature, 245, 53-54.

• Stenger, V. J. (2002.) Skeptical Inquirer. Skeptical Briefs Newsletter, December.

• Stenger, V. J. (1996). ESP and Cold Fusion: Parallels in Pseudoscience, http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/ESPColdFusion.pdf

• Stokes, D. (2001),Skeptical Inquirer (25[3], May/June, 22-25)

• Targ, E., Schlitz, M., & Irwin, H. J. (2000). Psi-related experiences. In E. Cardeña, S. J. Lynn, , & S. Krippner, S. (Eds.). (2000). Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (pp. 219-252). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

• Tart, C.T., Puthoff, H. E., & Targ, R. (1980). Information transfer under conditions of sensory shielding. Nature, 284, 191.

• Tart, C.T. (2002). Parapsychology and transpersonal psychology: "Anomalies" to be explained away or spirit to manifest? The Journal of Parapsychology, March 2002.

• Wagner, M. W., Monnet, M. (1979). Attitudes of college professors toward extra-sensory perception. Zetetic Scholar, 5, 7-17.

External links

Independent research organizations

• Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) was founded in 1973 by astronaut Edgar Mitchell to explore the frontiers of consciousness through scientific research.
• Society for Psychical Research (SPR). The original psychical research society founded in London in 1882.
• American Society for Psychical Research (ASPR), the oldest psychical research organization in the United States.
• Rhine Research Center and Institute for Parapsychology, originally part of Duke University, now an independent research center.
• Parapsychology Foundation, a not-for-profit foundation which provides a worldwide forum supporting the scientific investigation of psychic phenomena.
• Parapsychological Association This organization has been a member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science for over 20 years.
• International Academy of Consciousness
• Australian Institute of Parapsychological Research, a non-profit community association. Based in Sydney but with an Australia-wide membership base, it was established in 1977 and publishes the Australian Journal of Parapsychology.

University research organizations

• Koestler Parapsychology Unit at the University of Edinburgh.
• Parapsychology Research Group at Liverpool Hope University.
• The VERITAS Research Program at the University of Arizona
• Consciousness and Transpersonal Psychology Research Unit of Liverpool John Moores University.
• Center for the Study of Anomalous Psychological Processes at the University of Northampton.
• Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR), now inoperative, at Princeton University.
• Division of Perceptual Studies (DOPS), a unit of the Department of Psychiatric Medicine at the University of Virginia.
• Bigelow Chair of Consciousness Studies at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. (Terminated in 2002)
• Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit at Goldsmiths University of London.
• Perrott-Warrick Research Unit in the Psychology Department of the University of Hertfordshire.

Other links

• Parapsychology FAQ
• The online Library of Exploratory Science contains the complete text of many of the major journals in parapsychology and psychical research.
• Entry on parapsychology in the Skeptic's Dictionary
• James Randi Educational Foundation well-known critic of parapsychological research.
• The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry encourages the critical investigation of paranormal claims and parapsychology.