Jump to content

User talk:Black Rhino Ranger: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎It's either a tasmanian tiger or andrewsarchus: Since this is clearly a pathetic excuse to say "THERE IS A TASMANIAN TIGER BECOZ I SAY SO!!", removed.
Line 449: Line 449:


Yes and I'm going to england for 3 years, maybe forever, so i'll come back online in the weekends. [[User:Black Rhino Ranger|Black Rhino Ranger]] 07:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes and I'm going to england for 3 years, maybe forever, so i'll come back online in the weekends. [[User:Black Rhino Ranger|Black Rhino Ranger]] 07:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC)



==It's either a tasmanian tiger or andrewsarchus==
Black rhino ranger: I had another look in the first video and I what I saw did not look like a smilodon, It looked like a Tasmanian tiger or Andrewsarchus, so you should put in:

{| class="wikitable"
!Animal
!Biome
!Comfirning
!Notes
|-
| Tasmanian tiger
| Unknown (the video was too fuzzy but the creature did not like like a vampire cat, It looks more like a prehistoric dog)
| Video
| It might be an Andrewsarchus
|}

You can't be SURE it's one, so no. [[User:Dora Nichov|Dora Nichov]] 12:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Black rhino ranger: Which one, the tasmanian tiger or andrewsarchus?

Both, you can't be sure. Period. [[User:Dora Nichov|Dora Nichov]] 07:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:22, 22 August 2007

Please Read WP:Cruft

Thank you, and if you feel the Fred Fredburger page should not be merged, please state your reasons on the page. DietLimeCola 00:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Rhino Ranger: Because I want to give Fred fredburger his own article back. Sob sob

Do not remove the tag again until we have reached a decision in five days. By the way, just because YOU want him to have an article doesn't mean he deserves an article. This is not how Wikipedia works, you do not get to choose who has an article or not without a proper explanation. "Because he deserves one" does not explain why he deserves one. Unless you or anyone else can come up with a GOOD reason, it will probably end up in a merge. DietLimeCola 06:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Rhino Ranger: HE DESERVES AN ARTICLE OF HIS OWN

Did you not read the above? That ISN'T a good enough reason. 212.219.92.36 10:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Fredburger

I understand your desire to make this an article, but it does not meet a certain standard of quality for an article in that it it too small and the character is not notable enough to warrant his own article. And no, lists are not factored into the length of the article, how much actual article-content there is. - A Link to the Past (talk) 07:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alien list

I don't care what you want. You're not making it any better. You're just making one article too short and another too long. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And stop typing your name before your posts. Use the ~~~~ signature. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: NO, I'm keeping the name before posts

Be civil and try to talk in a respectful manner. Ending your posts on talk pages with signatures is part of being respectful to the entire Wiki community. Lest you violate WP:NPA, do so. In any case, that list of transformations seems to nicely fit in that article in any case. Although that article could be reduced, its present state is fine. You have no justification for splitting it, unless you can convince me right here. Sephiroth BCR (Converse)

Black rhino ranger: Forget it

That is being highly disrespectful. You are insulting a high ranking member of Wikipedia. Just do what they say CBFan 16:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While rudeness is bad, there is no such thing as a "high ranking member". --Wafulz 17:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: well I still ain't using it, Snakezilla and komodo lover don't like it too, They are retiring now since they were blocked

No, that's because you ARE SnakeZilla and Komodo Lover. For heaven's sakes, sign your name properly! It's the rules.

Yup, you're a sockpuppet and you can't prove what the animal in the video was AND please sign your name properly. Dora Nichov 08:58, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: Alright. Black Rhino Ranger 08:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Dora Nichov 09:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Face-Off

Thank you for experimenting with the page Animal Face-Off on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Dora Nichov 12:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Zoo Tycoon 2: Extinct Animals page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dora Nichov 12:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: I'm still not going to sign my name proply, I needed more space for my quotes and I did, i did see a tasmanian tiger in the video.

No you didn't. You saw an animal that you can not prove what it was. You MUST sign your name properly. At least spell properly.

Right. Dora Nichov 08:58, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here. Black Rhino Ranger 08:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much better. Dora Nichov 09:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your statements to Someguy

Threatening someone with blocking them is a clear violation of WP:NPA. Furthermore, you are not administrator and have little to no ability to block Someguy in any case whatsoever, seeing as your request to block him would fail on WP:ANI. Please stop this activity and try to be civil, or you might be reported to an administrator for your activities. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 16:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 12 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.--Wafulz 17:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Rhino Ranger: I was Joking for that one

Black rhino ranger: What did I do, I didn't blank up any pages and plus for animal face has to have the species name even it's the same species For example:

  • Saltwater crocdile vs Great white shark
  • White Rhino vs African Elephant
  • Asian Lion vs Indian Tiger
  • Hippo vs bull shark
  • Gray wolf vs Moutain lion
  • Polar bear vs walrus
  • Siberian tiger vs Grizzly bear
  • African lion vs Nile crocodile
  • Green anaconda vs Jaguar
  • Mountain gorilla vs African leopard
  • American alligor vs black bear
  • Sperm whale vs collosal squid

But you,re Wrong, there are different species And I like is having my nmae before the posts, have it at the end is not right and can you please get rid of date and time near your names, It's giving me a headache. if you don't say the species, I'll show this instead

Episode Title Location Winner Loser Won by
1 Crocodile vs. Shark Australia or Southeast Asia Shark Crocodile Biting crocodile's belly while the crocodile is breathing
2 Rhinoceros vs Elephant Africa Elephant Rhinoceros Topping rhinoceros over and stomping it
3 Lion vs. Tiger India Lion Tiger Biting the tiger's throat
4 Hippopotamus vs. Shark Africa Hippopotamus shark Grabbing and shaking the shark
5 Wolf vs. Cougar North America Cougar Wolf Crushing the wolf's throat
6 Bear vs. Walrus Arctic Walrus Bear Sunk tusks in the bear's back, killing it.
7 Tiger vs. Bear Siberia Bear Tiger The bear's paw swipe managed to break the tiger's spine and a throat bite finished it off
8 Lion vs. Crocodile Africa Nile Crocodile Lion Grabbed the lion into the water and killing it with a deathroll
9 Anaconda vs. Jaguar Amazon Anaconda Jaguar Binding the jaguar to suffocate it and crush its bone.
10 Gorilla vs. Leopard Africa Gorilla Leopard Broke leopard's spine with its arm
11 Alligator vs. Bear America Bear Alligator Tearing the alligator's belly with its claws
12 Whale vs. Squid Any ocean Whale Squid Caught the squid in its mouth for lunch

That's a stupid edit. If you don't state WHAT species of animal it is, it makes no sense. I mean, a regular squid would NEVER be able to take on a Sperm Whale.

What about the giant squid, He couldn't take it out too. Black Rhino Ranger 09:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have frequently violated WP:NPA by threatening other editors with nonexistant blocking threats and being highly uncivil. You've frequently ignored other editors when they've attempted to engage you in discussion, and instead responded with inane statements. Furthermore, adding our username and timestamp to the end of messages on talk pages is a common courtesy and respected by all members of the Wikipedia community. Not doing so is more of the uncivil actions shown above. In any case, the above chart is highly inferior to the one already on the page, as the present one on the page has a greater deal of detail (ignoring the fact tha the page needs to be cleaned up, but in any case). Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: How much time left am I staying

Possibly none due to being a sock puppet of User:Komodo lover. See this report at WP:SSP. Trying to evade blocks by making new accounts is not permitted. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 05:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you're wrong about the species because the Siberian and Bengal tigers are the same species. Just stop doing what others tell you not to do and you won't be banned. Dora Nichov 08:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But a regular tiger can't survive the cold. Black Rhino Ranger 14:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they do. Tigers live in the freezing cold all the ruddy time!! You, as an animal addict, would surely know that. 80.43.115.178 17:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, they're the same species. One simply has thicker fur. Dora Nichov 00:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bengal tigers and malayan tigers prefer tropical rainforests other than tundra. Black Rhino Ranger 02:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So? They're all the same species, they just live in different places. Dora Nichov 03:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well the Animal face off must mhave subspecies too otherwise it will not make sense. Black Rhino Ranger 10:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it will. Who cares what subspecies it is? We just care it's a Panthera tigris, not Panthera leo and that's it. Dora Nichov 11:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Rhino Ranger: What if kids who watch animal face off want the subspecies name and if I do it, the wikitable for animal face off will make more sense, What I mean is:

  • If "tiger vs brown bear", It could be a Bengal tiger or mabye a malayan tiger so add in Siberian tiger
  • If "Hippo vs bull shark", It could be a pygmy hippo so call it a common hippo
  • If Anaconda vs Jaguar (you now there are two different jaguars, One back and One spotted) it could be a yellow anaconda so call it a green anaconda (or what ever species it's fighting againest)
  • If Gorilla vs leopard, it could be a low land gorilla so add in Mountain Gorilla
  • IF Lion vs Tiger, It could be an african lion or malayan tiger so add in Asian lion and Indian tiger
  • If lion vs Nile crocodile, it could be an Asian lion so call it an African lion
  • If Gray wolf vs cougar, It could be a South america cougar so say north american Cougar
  • And if Polar bear vs walrus, It could be another type of walrus so say Pacific walrus
  • The sperm whale and collosal squid live in more places than antartica and the battle could be on those place.
  • When the fight ended I saw the sperm whale cactching the sqiud but I don't see it eat it, it must have grabbed it for lunch
  • In the "lion vs" fights, You can tell which is male or female by telling the head (males have manes).
  • The cougar and lion did not bite and crush the tiger and wolf's thoat, they look like blabbers

P.S: Why did you replace won by to what happened, I hate of how was the fight, I prefer of how did they win.

That's DUMB. You clearly know nothing about animals:

  • Tiger vs Brown Bear: It doesn't matter, we know it's Panthera tigris and that's all we need.
  • Hippopotamus vs Bull Shark: The common hippopotamus is just called the "hippopotamus" so just call it that, and it was not the pygmy hippopotamus, even an idiot could tell that, they look way too different.
  • Jaguar vs Anaconda: The two jaguars are just different colors, just like there are humans with darker skin and lighter skin.
  • Gorilla vs Leopard: Again, we just need the species.
  • Lion vs Tiger: We just need Panthera leo vs Panthera tigris. Sheesh.
  • Lion vs Nile Crocodile: Same thing. Besides, Asian lions and Nile crocodiles don't even live in the same place.
  • Gray Wolf vs Cougar: Same thing as the jaguar. It's not even a subspecies. And the fight couldn't have taken place in South America anyway.
  • Walrus vs Polar Bear: There's no other kind of walrus, there's only one kind.

Also, it's better to say the whole fight, it's more encyclopedic. Dora Nichov 00:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Rhino Ranger: But it make more sense if I add in:

  • Asian lion vs Indian tiger
  • Common hippo vs Bull shark
  • Gray wolf vs north american cougar
  • Polar bear vs pacific walrus
  • Siberian tiger vs Grizzly bear
  • African lion vs nile crocodile
  • Green anaconda vs Spotted Jaguar
  • MOuntain Gorilla vs leopard

And plus mum said I'm an animal expert.

Didn't you read AT ALL!? There's just ONE jaguar, ONE walrus and ONE cougar! And it just be more mixed up if you add the subspecies! You don't even have to say "common hippopotamus" because it's just called "hippopotamus" and as long as it's called that we know it's not a pygmy hippopotamus! Besides, it didn't even look like a pygmy hippopotamus! What idiot would think that? They probably don't even know what a pygmy hippopotamus is! Sheesh. Dora Nichov 05:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but saying Siberian tiger vs Grizzly bear will sound nicer

That's just your opinion. Dora Nichov 09:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why I'm Komodo lover, Snakezilla and black rhino ranger

The reason why I have more then one account is because I may think that one of my accounts may have been blocked forever, So that's why I created 3 accounts, When I was komodo lover, It was my dream to create list of goofs from camp lazlo untill I was Blocked for recreating it and when I was snakezilla, I created the wikitable for animal face off untill I was blocked for making it more sense and being Black rhino ranger is my only hope. Black Rhino Ranger 11:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, perhaps if you didn't keep constantly vandalising the pages, your other accounts wouldn't have been blocked (Creating a pointless page and changing a table so it looked like a two year old thing is vandalism). CBFan 16:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Dora Nichov 09:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, The name Komodo lover was a stupid name. I tried typing black rhino ranger but failed so I decided a new name, I tried it again but failed again so and I decided another new name. I tried it one more time and finally I did it. Black Rhino Ranger 02:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Giant squid

Name me at least 3 places the squid lives. Black Rhino Ranger 08:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Blue Vampire & Fred Fredburger.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blue Vampire & Fred Fredburger.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Underworld court, Billy's family and Toadblatt's Summer School of Sorcery

What Is the meaning of this, I want the billy's family, Underworld court and toadblatt characters to have more characters. here are some more characters I wanted to put in

Billy's familly

  • Billy's cousin
  • Billy's Grandpa
  • Billy's Grandma

Underworld court

File:Blue Vampire & Fred Fredburger.jpg
Blue Vampire & Fred Fredburger
  • Blue vampire
  • Officer bailiff fly
  • Octopus guy
  • Darth vader
  • Invisible man
  • Other monsters

Toadblatt's Summer School of Sorcery

  • Lord moldybutt
  • Herfeffine Pfefferfeffer
  • Dorko Malfly

Who is responsible for deleting them. Black Rhino Ranger 14:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What good is saying you'll never do it again, then continuing straight away? It is not a case of what you want, it is a case of what is generally needed. 80.43.115.178 17:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete the picture on my character list, I created it. Black Rhino Ranger 02:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Blue_Vampire_&_Fred_Fredburger.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 14:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EA

Thank you for experimenting with the page Zoo Tycoon 2: Extinct Animals on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Dora Nichov 04:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last time I checked, Wooly mammoths are more hairyer then Mastodons and Mastodons are more hairless, So the mammoth is in the box art, Mastodons have straight tusks and mammoths have curved tusks. Black Rhino Ranger 11:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have a clue, do you? Mastodons are just as hairy as Mammoths, AND they had curled tusks as well. As of now, you have no proof that the box art is a Mammoth and not a Mastodon. As far as we know, it is the Mastodon. And there is no Thylacine as of yet either, so stop whinging about it. 212.219.92.36 14:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong, I check in a book and saw that the Mastodon is Hairless and his tusks are more striaght and the animal I saw on the video looked like a Tylacine (Ow my head hurts). Signed by Black Rhino Ranger 15:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S: You should add in "Signed by" before your signs.

Wow, you really ARE a Moronator! Everyone knows that Mastodons were hairy AND they had large tusks. It's obvious that you want there to be a Mammoth in the game, just like you wanted there to be a Thylacine, so you've come up with multiple excuses. Well it isn't going to work. You can't prove that the animal on the cover is a Mammoth, and no amount of passing lies as the truth is going to work.

P.S. Such a rule does not exist.

P.P.S. Well, no wonder saying "Tylacine" makes your head hurt. It makes my head hurt as well...you've spelt it completely wrong! It's "Thylacine", and it is much easier to say than Tasmanian Tiger.212.219.92.36 15:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong, eveyone thinks that mastodon are hairy as wooly mammoth, one species of mastodon is hairy, but the plains and highland mastodon are as hairy as a rhino, I think that saying Thylacine was quite difficult to say and pronounced, hard to say but easy to write, for Tasmanian tiger, it's hard to write but easy to say. Black Rhino Ranger 07:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tasmanian tiger Is the first and much more easier word to say and Extinct animals isn't Extinct animals without a mammoth, the creators of ZT2 might want a mammoth in the game like they did in Dinosaur Digs

  • So? It may not be the same without a Mammoth, but you have no definate proof that there is a Mammoth, nor do you have proof that "Tasmanian Tiger" was the first name. Also, a comparison. Thylacine has 1 word, 3 sylibles and 9 letters. Tasmanian Tiger has 2 words, 6 sylibles and 14 letters. It is blatantly obvious, therefore, that Thylacine is easier to say AND write, so stop telling me otherwise. CBFan 16:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AND thylacine is more scientific too... PS: Good job CBFan. You're debating skills are pretty useful in this case. Dora Nichov 09:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can any of you STOP REMOVING MY QUOTES, Tasmanian tiger is the first word i have heard of.

Wikipedia is not for such things. Go to a forum. And thylacine is more scientific and easier to type. There. I first heard Tasmanian wolf, but you don't see me typing that overly long name all the time. And dinosaurs are animals too. Dora Nichov 10:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this is my talk page so YOU CAN POST YOUR IDEAS HERE, what if you couldn't reply to another user on a forum and You don't tell BBR what to do. Black Rhino Ranger 14:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? Oh, that's just cheeky. YOU tell US what to do all the freaking time! If you create an article and it gets deleted, you shout and scream "WHY DID YOU DELETE THAT!! I WANT THAT ARTICLE!! HU-WHA!! HU-WHA!! YOU WILL BE BANNED!! HU-WHA!! HU-WHA!!" Seriously, grow up and stop posting these stupid lists. Visit a flipping forum where you can post such lists.

Yeah, you can't tell us what to do either. Dora Nichov 01:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: This website is the perfect place for wishlists, plush forums are for dorks and a rule for multiple accounts is for pigs.

Try telling that to admins. Dora Nichov 00:25, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked, because evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover has shown that this account is a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of User:Komodo lover used to circumvent Wikipedia policies. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Akhilleus (talk) 00:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Rhino Ranger: Please say Forever

The FORMAL, Wikipedian way of saying that is indefinite, and nothing you say will let us change our mind. (How do you think of your own trick getting turned backwards on you, huh?) Dora Nichov 13:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Rhino Ranger: Yeah but saying foever is much easyier to say.

Again, nothing will change our minds. It's formal. Dora Nichov 00:26, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Stop changing the message indicating that you are banned. Editing it will not remove or reduce the time of your ban. If you wish to appeal your ban (not that it would be successful, as you admitted to using socks to evade a ban above), then follow the directions listed on your ban. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do. Black Rhino Ranger 02:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You admitted to using sockpuppets to evade a ban above. As per WP:SOCK, this is prohibited and earns you an indefinite ban on the puppetmaster and sockpuppet accounts. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did you block Snakezilla and Komodo lover and Womcat. And I'm not a Sock puppet, I'm a glove puppet. Black Rhino Ranger 02:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Komodo lover is the puppetmaster, as it was your last account before you were banned on it. Then you opened accounts, User:Snakezilla, User:Black Rhino Ranger, and User:Womcat, referred to as sockpuppets. As you used these accounts to edit despite being banned on your other accounts, you have violated WP:SOCK. As such, the puppetmaster account, and all sockpuppet accounts receive an indefinite ban. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did you know my accounts. Signed by Black Rhino Ranger 02:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, you admitted to it above. Next, it was painfully obvious that User:Womcat was you. In any case, stop making sockpuppets and vandalizing this page. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. Before I wrote that, Dora knew I was snakezilla, How did she Know. Signed by Black Rhino Ranger 02:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intuition. Derivation. Wonderful things. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about. Black Rhino Ranger 02:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Cough* I'm male. And I knew because A. You vandalized similarly in the exact same pages and B. You had the same way of signing as Snakezilla did. Dora Nichov 11:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did you know that Womcat is me? Black Rhino Ranger 11:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Four answers. 1: You actively admitted it. 2: His wishlist for Extinct Animals is EXACTLY the same as yours. 3: He posted the wishlist despite not being in the right place, just like you did. 4: He actively insulted a Wikipedian just because he didn't get his way...just like you do. We KNOW Womcat is Black Rhino Ranger is you, and you are breaking rules by continually creating accounts when one is banned. 212.219.92.36 14:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That no good puppet, he stole my ideas. Black Rhino Ranger 03:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop acting innocent. You already confessed Womcat is you. Dora Nichov 11:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Rhino Ranger: I lied.

Well It's too late to delete them Unless I keep this one and do any of you know how to delete them and I'll never create more them one account and I'll add this in. Black Rhino Ranger 15:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No it isn't, because they will be blocked. 212.219.92.36 15:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Black Rhino Ranger (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here: I'll never create another account if you unblock me, I Promise

Decline reason:

Yeah, right, your actions prove otherwise. — Yamla 15:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've said that THREE times now, why should we believe you? 212.219.92.36 15:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Dora Nichov 10:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enough

This is your final warning. Remove the message indicating that you are banned and I will request an administrator to protect this page, thus preventing you from editing on this page. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You wouldn't dare, Would you. Black Rhino Ranger 02:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd advise you not to talk to people like that. Dora Nichov 11:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should get rid of the blocking thing, You were once blocked. Black Rhino Ranger 15:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have no right to say or order that. 212.219.92.36 15:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was, but got something silly. You did something REALLY wrong... Dora Nichov 09:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I Forgot. [CENSORED]

NO! You MUST sign your name properly!! It is the RULES! As it is that you are NOT allowed to create numerous accounts, just so you can vandalise. So STOP IT!! 212.219.92.36 10:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it IS a ruddy option! Your rebellious signing is NOT the option! You MUST sign your name properly or Get off Wikipedia forever! Prefferably the latter because, quite frankly, we're all fed up of your whinging. Every day, it's "FRED FREDBURGER DESERVES AN ARTICLE BECOZ I SAY SO!!", or "THERE'S A MAMOTH AND UNICRON IN EXTINT ANIMALS BECOZ I SAY SO!", as well as "THE ANIMAL-FCAE OFF TABLE IS WRONG BECOZ I SAY SO!!" plus "I MUST SIGN MY NAME LIKE THIS BECOZ I SAY SO!!" and not forgetting "YOU WILL BE BANNED BECOZ I SAY SO!!" Seriously, you need to mature. There was a reason you were banned, and creating numerous accounts so you can vandalise some more is not working. 80.43.143.0 10:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: I,ve sign my name like your way for months and I'M SICK OF IT. WELL I'M NOT DOING IT NO MORE and now you have proof that there is a mammoth in the game but now I give up, It's a mastodon, I find a way to re create fred fredburger's article because not only i said so but he's my favourite character, Animal face will make more sense if I add in the subspecies name and SAYING "GO AWAY IS NOT GOING TO HELP".

Yeah, do what they say, BRR. Chocolate Rhino 01:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't play dumb with us Komodo Lover, we KNOW that it's you! 212.219.92.36 08:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Listen you fleabags, I don't take order and I can sign my name whenever I want and there is nothing you can do to change my mind. Black Rhino Ranger 16:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At least you can no longer vandalize ANY pages anymore, fleabag! Dora Nichov 00:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is NOT an Order, Komodo Lover, it is a beneficial aid. By signing in your rebellious way and wailing like a two year old when we ask you not to, you are not going to get anywhere. It is much easier to type this sign (~) four times than it is to type Black Rhino Ranger. CBFan 21:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: You are all being lazy, typing your name in an exercising. I can't go back to being komodo lover because My password did not match komodo lover's password so the only Handpuppets I staying are snakezilla and Black rhino Ranger.

We're not lazy, we just like to do things easier. Now sign your name properly. Dora Nichov 11:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: If I do that, I'll have to destroy this page.

That's no excuse. Dora Nichov 03:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: I alredy to you, there's nothing you can do to change my mind

What's "I alredy to you"? Doesn't make any sense. Dora Nichov 11:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black rhino ranger: I mean: I already to you, there's nothing you can do to change my mind

You're already banned anyway so whatever. Dora Nichov 13:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Rhino Ranger: Listen you softies, I already told you, I can sign my name what ever I want and there is nothing you can do to change my mind and BBR was born knowin what to do.

I think I'll request protection for this page... Dora Nichov 05:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NO PLEASE DON'T, I'll Never create another account or make animal face off more sense or comfirn the mammoth or sign my name my way or threating other users and vadalise a page, and if you unblock me, I'll just look at the pages and the talk page is all I have left so PLEASE DON"T PROTECTED IT. Black Rhino Ranger 15:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to trust you, but I will this time. I'm not going to let the admins unblock you (they probably wouldn't agree anyway) but I'm not going to request protection. Happy now? Dora Nichov 09:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and I'm going to england for 3 years, maybe forever, so i'll come back online in the weekends. Black Rhino Ranger 07:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]