[[User:Inetpup|Inetpup]], if you continue to vandalize my user page, I'll have no choice but to report you. [[User:Graham Wellington|Graham Wellington]] 19:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
[[User:Inetpup|Inetpup]], if you continue to vandalize my user page, I'll have no choice but to report you. [[User:Graham Wellington|Graham Wellington]] 19:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Inetpup, if you believe that Graham Wellington is a sockpuppet, the proper avenue is filing a report with both evidence that this editor is probably the same person as another editor and an indication of [[Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Forbidden_uses_of_sock_puppets|sockpuppet abuse]]. Notes on his talk page probably won't bring him to confess and leave Wikipedia awash with guilt.--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 04:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Inetpup, if you believe that Graham Wellington is a sockpuppet, the proper avenue is filing a report at [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets]] with both evidence that this editor is probably the same person as another editor and an indication of [[Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Forbidden_uses_of_sock_puppets|sockpuppet abuse]]. Notes on his talk page probably won't bring him to confess and leave Wikipedia awash with guilt.--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 04:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Bay Area Rapid Transit, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. 210physicq (c) 00:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An article which consists of nothing but links to other sites is specifically forbidden by WP:NOT. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please use the Edit Summary
I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! --Matt 02:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not change my user page
I maintain my user page - please refrain from updating it. Thanks! --Matt 04:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Japanese kana
Thanks for the info about the characters. I used the 'tsi' because the Ze in my name is pronounced zee as in zebra. Is there a way to do that? - Zepheus <ツィフィアス> 04:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thread continued on your discussion page--Inetpup 18:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind the edits you made to my page (I do have a minor interest in those topics) (oh, and thank you), but it would have been nice to ask me first before adding. Otherwise, no harm done. --210physicq (c) 03:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion
A tag has been placed on Red stapler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Bookworm857158367 06:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Fortress hub, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 07:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FYI
FYI: transatlantic and transpacific aren't capitalized or CamelCase. Cheers --Matt 01:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
diff - not referring to your IP ;) --Matt 06:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My user page
Please stop editing my user page. While you may have been well-intentioned, I prefer to keep my layout, including linking, content, etc. —210physicq (c) 01:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Intercontinental
Intercontinental means: Taking place between two or more continents. --Matt 16:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, got confused with 'transcontinental'. Good eye, Matty! --Inetpup 04:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know who "Matty" is. --Matt 04:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's the nickname I picked for you. Aren't you glad or impressed? --Inetpup 04:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Aww, how cute! --Matt 04:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
HP code
I reverted out this trivia section since that is not an encyclopedic heading. If the information is worth keeping, it should be included in that main article text. If that tidbit is true, the IATA code lists should be updated to include that previous use. In any case, if this is added back to the HP article, it should include a reference, otherwise it will be tagged needing one. Vegaswikian 02:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you are correct that I should read up on aspects of Wikipedia in general, but perhaps I don't need to be educated regarding 'Trivia' as it relates to airlines. Authors of all the other airliner articles have spoken. And they have overwhelmingly and have collectively decided to insert a Trivia section for all other airliner articles. I can't say that there's something special about US Airways and America West that should allow them to be non-standard, such that only they exclude a trivia section, when all their peers have one. Thanks.--Inetpup 05:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are saying that this is an accepted standard despite the fact that that section is not considered as being needed by the WP:AIRLINES project? If the material is in fact encyclopedic, it should be included in the article text. Most of this material is historical and should be there. Vegaswikian 05:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Former routes
"Revert until discussion is done; shouldn't single out SFO; should apply standard to DFW, LAX, etc." - The conversation seems to be done, according to the SeaTac page and the WikiProject:Airlines talk page. As I said, "Please discuss on talk page if you disagree" - so, if you disagree, instead of reverting, please contribute to the discussion. Thanks, --Matt 02:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page San Francisco International Airport on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. dcandeto 09:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Warning
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at San Francisco International Airport. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. dcandeto 09:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No personal attacks
With regards to your comments on Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Inetpup: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Matt 15:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Conduct and community
Your edits often appear to be useful and constructive, and I believe you are adding good information to Wikipedia. However, many of your actions lately seem to be anti-community. I've thought of bringing the situation to Wikipedia:Requests for comment, but I hope that you can steer right in the future. I remind you to look at Wikipedia's policies on civility, assuming good faith, consensus, and others. I recommend respecting other editors, and the community - if you treat others well, you'll see more respect. --Matt 05:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't mean to offend you personally. You, Matty, have been mostly polite, though sometimes you seem like the police and sometimes obsessed. But overall, you've been a fair guy. As for my behavior, it's a function of my style. If someone tries to hit me or shove something down my throat, I'll hit back. But additionally, my sarcasm is thought to add humor to an otherwise dull environment; so, those with a twisted side will appreciate that. Perhaps I pushed the envelope too far this time, but I'm learning from my mistakes. The rules of Wikipedia are far too voluminous for me to read comprehensively, so I learn as I go (through my mistakes). Finally, late-night editing, gets me into trouble, so I'll try to avoid that. --Inetpup 06:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you liked my graphical edits to the WMATA Silver lineMetro system map showing the Silver Line? Or you liked my BART accidents section?--Inetpup 01:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Talk pages
Please post messages on TALK pages and not USER pages as you did with User:Mlaroche Thanks in advance. --Samtheboy(t/c) 09:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Personal information
Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has a right if they wish to remain completely anonymous. Wikipedia policy on that issue is strictly enforced. Posting private information about a user with the intent to annoy, threaten or harass, specifically their (alleged) name and/or personal details, is strictly prohibited as harassment, and users who do that are often immediately blocked from editing Wikipedia. Such posting can cause offense or embarrassment to the victim of the posting, not least because it means that their name, and any personal criticism or allegations made against them can then appear on web searches.
If you have posted such information, please remove it immediately. Please then follow the link to this page and follow the instructions there, including emailing this address. It will then be removed from the archives of Wikipedia.
If you do not ensure that the personal information you posted is removed from this site you will be blocked from editing this site. Remember: Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, includingyou. --Matt 05:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know that this was contrary to policy because you were already in the public domain. There are so many fussy things with Wikipedia policy that I'm not accustomed to (that are not present on such mediums as the Usenet or discussion groups). I do make it a point to comply with Wikipedia policies as soon as you or someone else inform me of them. For example, in trying to comply with your request I tried to do a diff, but the info you didn't want on there was already purged. In other words, I couldn't e-mail oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org because the diff didn't produce any results.--Inetpup 09:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Linton Johnson
Thank you for experimenting with the page Linton Johnson on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Downwards 07:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Linton Johnson page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Downwards 08:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reply
I shall gladly do so. Can you prove that the problem you detailed actually exists? —Kurykh 05:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is a problem with shared international terminals. It happens at LAX, DFW, IAH, EWR, BOS.--Inetpup 05:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's not proof. That's considered conjecture. Any published source detailing such a problem, please? (yes, I know I sound anal, but until you provide it, the piece of info you provided is fair game for deletion) —Kurykh 16:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at Bay Area Rapid Transit. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. --Matt 15:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reply
Why should I tell you who I am?
Why did I what? —Kurykh 05:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop trolling my talk page. Thanks. —Kurykh 00:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome!
Hello, Inetpup! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to United Airlines, makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The information added to this article was inappropriate. Short term news that does not meet notability guidelines should not be in an article.Trusilver 05:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SFO Mexican/Canadian flights
I expanded upon why Canadian flights are allowed to arrive/depart in domestic terminals (they pre-clear) and removed the "source of controversy" line, because you haven't cited any sources that suggest there is a controversy. My cursory Google search couldn't turn any up. If you can cite sources which discuss the controversy, please feel free to add it back in. FCYTravis 06:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Interlined/Interlinked/Interconnected/Conjoined
I don't know. While any of these may work, the Muni website uses "interconnected": [1]. Oh yeah, there's a discussion on the Muni Metro talk page. —Kurykh 06:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I seriously question "interlined"; while it is a real word (I was skeptical and had to look it up), it has a very specific meaning that doesn't seem to apply to the K/T situation very well (check Dictionary.com's definition of it). +ILike2BeAnonymous 06:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reply
I can do without your condescending language. —Kurykh 05:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do Wikipedia on some of my spare time, when I have no homework or after I'm done with it. And I do Wikipedia at home. That's why I don't edit as often during school days. —Kurykh 05:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
U$D
Funny, but not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please don't use this notation. Thanks. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 03:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Former airline hubs, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Former airline hubs satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Former airline hubs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Former airline hubs during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Russavia 14:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KC-10
Thanks for re-wording the entry on the KC-10 Extender page. The KC-10 can carry other payload besides fuel, such as people and supplies, but I couldn't think of how to reword it better. - BillCJ 05:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No prob. Thanks for being a pleasant Wikipedian, unlike other losers here. Thanks! --Inetpup 05:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KC-777
There are far better sources out there that are more current than that one you have chosen to use. You might find some in the Boeing KC-767 page. As written, your item implies it is still being activley considered, which it is not - Boeing went with the KC-767 earlier this year. Sure, it's still a possibility for a future order, but that is just speculation at this point. Incidently, the story you cite doesn't say it would take two years to convert the KC-777, but three (but I wouldn't know that as I didn't read the story). - BillCJ 18:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Inetpup, stop
Inetpup, if you continue to vandalize my user page, I'll have no choice but to report you. Graham Wellington 19:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Inetpup, if you believe that Graham Wellington is a sockpuppet, the proper avenue is filing a report at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets with both evidence that this editor is probably the same person as another editor and an indication of sockpuppet abuse. Notes on his talk page probably won't bring him to confess and leave Wikipedia awash with guilt.--chaser - t 04:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Phoenix Airport incident
Regarding the Phoenix Airport incident discussed here, Wikipedia's editorial decision-making process is consensus through discussion. While a 4-1 majority is not the same as consensus, it does indicate that more discussion is necessary before inserting the disputed material.--chaser - t 04:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has a right if they wish to remain completely anonymous. Wikipedia policy on that issue is strictly enforced. Posting private information about a user with the intent to annoy, threaten or harass, specifically their (alleged) name and/or personal details, is strictly prohibited as harassment, and users who do that are often immediately blocked from editing Wikipedia. Such posting can cause offense or embarrassment to the victim of the posting, not least because it means that their name, and any personal criticism or allegations made against them can then appear on web searches.
Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at Bay Area Rapid Transit. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. --Matt 15:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to United Airlines, makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The information added to this article was inappropriate. Short term news that does not meet notability guidelines should not be in an article. Trusilver 05:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
