User talk:Markanthony101

The pages you have listed for deletion have not been listed properly, and are not appearing on the main WP:Articles for deletion page. Please read WP:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion. Thank you. —Salmar ^(talk) 20:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mickylynch101 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 03:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been indef blocked per above. — Rlevse • Talk • 04:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Markanthony101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What??? I have looked over the case and it seems to have been made with close consultation with a few friends of a particular admin. There was no discussion and no external debate. And all the evidence in circumstantial. Unblock me and at least give me the chance of a fair hearing.

Decline reason:

Fairly straight-forward case of WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK violations, apparently. You do not need to be unblocked to state your case here. — Yamla (talk) 15:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Markanthony101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There is no evidence to support the claim. This is a travesty of an injustice, and you all violated WP:CIVIL by not even giving me a fair chance to defend myself. Also, you violated WP:Assume Good Faith. I have nothing to say other than I think the accusation is absurd, and the only evidence linking me to this other use is similarity of name and the fact we nominated certain articles for deletion from a certain user. The fact is that I was looking through some users pages randomly clicking on links to articles they created. When I saw he made some truly terrible articles, I decided to nominate a few for deletion, just doing a little to improve the free exchange of knowledge wikipedia has spearheaded. The way you have ruthlessly stamped on a newcomer is completely unfair and I will be following this matter up.

P.S- 101 is a common end to a name. Markanthony101 is my name because I am a classicist buff, with a particular fascination with Anthony. 101 would intend that I intend to take you to 'school' over him. It was an ironic, self deprecating joke that none of you seemed to have got. Please consider this case logically and respond with a fair response, free of the needless and pointless template talk that dominates your day to day discussion.

Decline reason:

I see sufficient evidence to merit a block here. — Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 15:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Markanthony101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of anyone else. As I said, you have no real evidence to support your claims. Please, at least unblock me so I can post at the discussion for my permanent deletion. I want more people to look at the evidence and see that this is a result of one users personal animosity towards me. Look at the testimony I have just offered and you will realise there is a perfectly logical explanation for everything here. Please, for the Love of God, at least logically defend your position than merely just saying 'there is sufficient evidence'. Have a heart, I am an innocent man who hasn't been given a chance to defend himself.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not a sockpuppet of anyone else. As I said, you have no real evidence to support your claims. Please, at least unblock me so I can post at the discussion for my permanent deletion. I want more people to look at the evidence and see that this is a result of one users personal animosity towards me. Look at the testimony I have just offered and you will realise there is a perfectly logical explanation for everything here. Please, for the Love of God, at least logically defend your position than merely just saying 'there is sufficient evidence'. Have a heart, I am an innocent man who hasn't been given a chance to defend himself. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sockpuppet of anyone else. As I said, you have no real evidence to support your claims. Please, at least unblock me so I can post at the discussion for my permanent deletion. I want more people to look at the evidence and see that this is a result of one users personal animosity towards me. Look at the testimony I have just offered and you will realise there is a perfectly logical explanation for everything here. Please, for the Love of God, at least logically defend your position than merely just saying 'there is sufficient evidence'. Have a heart, I am an innocent man who hasn't been given a chance to defend himself. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sockpuppet of anyone else. As I said, you have no real evidence to support your claims. Please, at least unblock me so I can post at the discussion for my permanent deletion. I want more people to look at the evidence and see that this is a result of one users personal animosity towards me. Look at the testimony I have just offered and you will realise there is a perfectly logical explanation for everything here. Please, for the Love of God, at least logically defend your position than merely just saying 'there is sufficient evidence'. Have a heart, I am an innocent man who hasn't been given a chance to defend himself. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}