User talk:Counter-revolutionary

PM's

C-R as long as the given name is there in the Info box I think the rest of us would have no objections to their title being the same size, either above or below name, either would be appropriate. - Galloglass 13:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I can't really get it to work how I'd like to see it. Rt Hon has to go 1st, in small, then the Title in bold on the 2nd row, followed by the name in bold on the 3rd, then the 4th row, the honorifics in small. - Galloglass 14:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Hola

Great to see you back. Happy editing. Thanks, SqueakBox 17:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

You seem to have missed one

As I know you don't like those..... One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 09:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I wouldn't imagine he had a barber, unless you mean Mr. Sheen? One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 09:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

He doesn't seem to have taken the hint, and I'm too lazy to fight your edit wars for you.... One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 18:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Congrats

Congratulations on being unblocked. That Sussexman/David Lauder/Chelsea Tory stuff, was quite messy. GoodDay (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Seconded. What a palaver!--Major Bonkers (talk) 16:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Warnings

See WP:WARN, and start with level 1, possibly ideally after politely asking them to engage in discussion about the content they are removing. Oh, and we both know 2+2 is 4 ;) One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 21:20, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

"Honourary"

It is "honorary", worldwide. See honorary degree, or any dictionary. --John (talk) 23:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I know, I know. Don't know what I was thinking. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 00:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't proxy for User:David Lauder

You have done just that[1] in violation of the conditions of your unblock. See also Wikipedia:TER#User:Counter-revolutionary. Tyrenius (talk) 18:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Apart from the fact that it's technically incorrect and largely irrelevant. If this nonsense persists, I shall apply to ArbCom for publication of the relevant data per privacy policy, clause 6. The technical evidence of this case is incontrovertible and CR, of all people, knows *exactly* who did what here - Alison ^❤ 18:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Knight Bachelor

Necrothesp is reverting everything you and I edit according Knight Bachelor, he's quite arrogant. Could take look to this: User_talk:Demophon#Knights_Bachelor? I have placed a reply on his site: User_talk:Necrothesp#Knights_Bachelor. Demophon (talk) 19:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you find it okay if we together start a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(biographies) about use of the abbrevation "Kt" behind names of Knights Bachelor who are also peers, baronets or knights of the various statutory orders? Demophon (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good. Kt. is appropriate for peers and baronets. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 20:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

C-r, is it you?

C-r. Would you be kind enough to confirm that you are back in person?. I do hope it is not just someone pretending to be you?. best wishes (sincerely). Bob BScar23625 (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

ps : I never believed a word about this Sussexman, Christchurch, Olborne et al. BScar23625 (talk) 16:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)