Jump to content

User talk:Giggy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎RFA: objection!
→‎RFA: I even know the scores
Line 114: Line 114:
::::::Hell, I'll support you this time round... You better have a damn good answer to Q4 ready though<font face="Trebuchet MS"> — [[User:Iridescent|<font color="#E45E05">''iride''</font>]][[User_talk:Iridescent|<font color="#C1118C">''scent''</font>]]</font> 01:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
::::::Hell, I'll support you this time round... You better have a damn good answer to Q4 ready though<font face="Trebuchet MS"> — [[User:Iridescent|<font color="#E45E05">''iride''</font>]][[User_talk:Iridescent|<font color="#C1118C">''scent''</font>]]</font> 01:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::::Oppose, everyone knows that proper nouns should be capitalized; as DHMO's signature does not reflect this grammar point, he is unsuited for adminship. <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 01:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::::Oppose, everyone knows that proper nouns should be capitalized; as DHMO's signature does not reflect this grammar point, he is unsuited for adminship. <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 01:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
::::::::The result will be 48 support, 12 oppose, +/- 5 either way on both scores. Bet you...<font face="Trebuchet MS"> — [[User:Iridescent|<font color="#E45E05">''iride''</font>]][[User_talk:Iridescent|<font color="#C1118C">''scent''</font>]]</font> 01:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:27, 1 May 2008

User talk:Giggy/HeaderUser:Dihydrogen Monoxide/GAN backlog

FACs needing feedback
viewedit
Ethics Review it now
Susanna Hoffs Review it now
2023 Union Square riot Review it now
Aston Martin Vanquish (2012) Review it now


I started cutting out a box shot for the logo, but it will take a while... not sure if you could do anything with this in the meantime (woo for poor man's typographical comparisons!) :P Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 20:24, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I could use that...it's a derivative of a logo, so it wouldn't be free, I'd say, but otherwise, it's good. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 00:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, I'll do that soon. · AndonicO Engage. 10:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks heaps! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. · AndonicO Engage. 12:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
congrats, water! Looks like it made FA. Sorry I was rather useless, I only made about 6-8 very minor fixes. AndonicO deserves a barnstar for his efforts! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter delivery note

Hey Alex. Did you still want to continue the delivery of WP:FING newsletters or did you want me to suspend your job in the queue? Please let me know. Thanks! — E talk aussie 05:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suspend please. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 08:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Signature

My sig, translated from german, means 'the well-tempered fox'. Now you know... Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explains a lot! ;) dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah, and good show on using the AoE image, I left it on Wikipedia instead of commons 'cause I was pretty sure you would have to change the license tags... Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 11:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, thanks for that. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AGF RfA questions

Thanks for asking people to select an AGF question on RfAs. I think it's a good idea. Dan Beale-Cocks 21:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed :) dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disagreed :), but meh, life goes on.... Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WMF logos

Any other places you'd suggest? Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/MBisanzBot_2#Discussion. MBisanz talk 10:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:O_Canada#GAN_on_hold Gary King (talk) 19:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shall take a look ASAP. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats.

Congrats on the FA. :) · AndonicO Engage. 22:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate the help from both of you—thanks heaps! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nice one. =D Malinaccier (talk) 00:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks to your help ;) dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 00:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments have been addressed. Please reply back. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 01:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments have been addressed. Gary King (talk) 19:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for heads up. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crackdown GA

Just a note that I've addressed the points raised by your review. --MASEM 04:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Aleena's RfA

Dihydrogen Monoxide...Thank you for participating in my nomination for adminship. Your comments have shown me those areas in which I need improve my understanding. I hope that my future endevors on Wikipedia will lead to an even greater understanding of it. If you wish to further discuss the nomination, please use its talk page. Stop by my talk page anytime, even if it is just to say hello. Have a wonderful day! - LA @ 04:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
H2O...There is no reason for me to be uncivil to you for your reservations about my ability to use the tools for which I was nominated. As Keegan said in the nomination, it is no big deal. Hope your day is going well. - LA @ 13:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, and best wishes in the future. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diorama

I might be able to look for those reviews you asked for in my library on Thursday. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Philosopher's RFA

Hey DHMO, I just replied over yonder 'bout the AGF challenge and the whatnot and wherebetween. My longwindedness has overcome me, and the whole section has become unwieldy. Care if it is moved to talk to be less of a mess? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard, it was already moved (I think by balloonman). Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Probably a good idea; I get the feeling our discussion wasn't doing much in the way of helping the candidate, though I would like to discuss it. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!!!!

Just wanted to say well done for getting AoE to FA. A flying visit to your talk page, I know. Ashnard Talk Contribs 19:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers mate! FT drive on its way...I'll try and use those reviews you sent me now. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

So when do you think you will be ready for another RFA? <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 20:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha...not for a while, I think. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
+1 support! Tiptoety talk 23:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose; too many featured articles. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I view self opposes as not being power hungry. Tiptoety talk 00:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've got 4 prior RfAs for that... dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 01:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hell, I'll support you this time round... You better have a damn good answer to Q4 ready thoughiridescent 01:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, everyone knows that proper nouns should be capitalized; as DHMO's signature does not reflect this grammar point, he is unsuited for adminship. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 01:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result will be 48 support, 12 oppose, +/- 5 either way on both scores. Bet you...iridescent 01:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]