Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs with city names in the title: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
k |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Delete''' - Oh puh-lease. Trivial and unencyclopedic. [[User:Madman2001|Madman]] ([[User talk:Madman2001|talk]]) 14:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - Oh puh-lease. Trivial and unencyclopedic. [[User:Madman2001|Madman]] ([[User talk:Madman2001|talk]]) 14:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per [[Wikipedia:Lists]] (discriminate and organized list). Referencing issues should be solved per [[Wikipedia:SOFIXIT]]. Even if a similar article was deleted, it's irrelevant, because 1) consensus can change and 2) such an argument is essentially [[Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING]] anyway. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 16:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per [[Wikipedia:Lists]] (discriminate and organized list). Referencing issues should be solved per [[Wikipedia:SOFIXIT]]. Even if a similar article was deleted, it's irrelevant, because 1) consensus can change and 2) such an argument is essentially [[Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING]] anyway. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 16:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' as trivia.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] ([[User talk:Berig|talk]]) 17:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:18, 11 May 2008
- List of songs with city names in the title (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Nominated for the same reason as its recently deleted sister article, List of songs with state names in the title. Like the aformentioned article, I initially prodded this on the grounds that it was unencyclopaedic, but the tag was removed by the author. The sister article was deleted a day or so ago per AFD discussion, so, considering this list is essentially the same thing, I decided to take this here as well. Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 07:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Entertaining, sure. But trivial and unencyclopedic, especially when you consider the unforgiveable sin of having skipped over the Stompin' Tom Connors opus "Sudbury Saturday Night". Okay, that last bit's not really part of my reasoning. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 07:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as trivial and not encyclopedic. Good Ol’factory (talk) 07:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, has no place here. Punkmorten (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Trivial and unencyclopedic. asenine say what? 09:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. —ErgoSum88 (talk) 09:19, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Child, are you a deletionist? And I said Ma'am I am tonight! Delete JuJube (talk) 10:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I can name literally hundreds not already on this list. Proof indeed that such a list is indiscriminate in nature. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 14:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Oh puh-lease. Trivial and unencyclopedic. Madman (talk) 14:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Wikipedia:Lists (discriminate and organized list). Referencing issues should be solved per Wikipedia:SOFIXIT. Even if a similar article was deleted, it's irrelevant, because 1) consensus can change and 2) such an argument is essentially Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING anyway. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as trivia.--Berig (talk) 17:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)