Jump to content

User talk:Leujohn/Archive 3 (December 2008-March 2010): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 138: Line 138:
[[Jennifer Brunner]] has been nominated for a [[WP:GAR|good article reassessment]]. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to [[WP:WIAGA|good article quality]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jennifer Brunner/1|here]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 14:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
[[Jennifer Brunner]] has been nominated for a [[WP:GAR|good article reassessment]]. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to [[WP:WIAGA|good article quality]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jennifer Brunner/1|here]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 14:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
:It isn't obvious to me that anyone at [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jennifer Brunner/1]] has figured out what things you thought were POV in the paragraphs you cited in the review. Would you care to point out which things you felt were POV in each of the paragraphs that you mentioned.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 00:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
:It isn't obvious to me that anyone at [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jennifer Brunner/1]] has figured out what things you thought were POV in the paragraphs you cited in the review. Would you care to point out which things you felt were POV in each of the paragraphs that you mentioned.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 00:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
::If you have any intent to be helpful, point out a sentence or two from each paragraph that you said was POV. Then, I can fix them.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 06:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
:::Last I looked, no one could point out any of the POV in the sections you noted in your review. I need help fixing the article. Please point to the stuff you were talking about, so I can fix it.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 06:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


== Editor Review ==
== Editor Review ==

Revision as of 06:13, 3 January 2009

User:Leujohn
User talk:Leujohn
User:Leujohn/Workshop
User:Leujohn/Sandbox
User:Leujohn/History
Special:Emailuser/Leujohn
Special:Contributions/Leujohn
User Talk Workshop Sandbox History eMail Contributions

Course completion problems

Can't I be inactive as in completing courses and submitting assignments this month?Semester exams are going on and they run till 7th Jan! :( EaswarH (talk) 09:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the leeway.Cool. EaswarH (talk) 10:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

How do you nominate an editor to be banned?

One user Imranb35 is persistently doing vandalism,and POV edits despite his contributions being repeatedly undone by different editors and warnings on his talk page.How do you nominate someone to be banned?EaswarH (talk) 07:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Do you mean steps to give warnings?If so,I would prefer I not be the person to give him a warning,because the controversial edits involve Indo-Pak affairs,and since I'm from India,my warning would be probably be considered non-NPOV itself.EaswarH (talk) 13:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
The citation IS the problem.Said events took place before I was born,and I'm no defence expert.And I can't possibly use Indian Military version,assuming I can find them,because that again is not NPOV.That's why I'm leaving it to the people who do know about these defence matters.EaswarH (talk) 06:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your careful consideration at my successful RfA. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 04:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

--Vltava 68 10:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, we've had our HS concert, so it isn't that early. Cheers! Vltava 68 10:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Toyah Willcox

Hullo,

I edited Toyah Willcox's page last week and you said you'd revert it, but you didn't :)

Another question, How do I reply tou your replies? Or do I make another topic?

Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.44.197.132 (talk) 13:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello there. You expressed a wish in your neutral vote to see me answer Question 5 on my RfA; I just wanted to let you know that I have now answered that question, and so you may now wish to consider how you would like to vote in light of that. It Is Me Here t / c 22:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

late on lessons i know.

I am overwhelmed with my other classes, outside of Wiki, so i havent started them yet, is that OK?

Ill try to do some soon. Thanks Dcollins52 (talk) 18:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC) I will start after the new year? THanks for understanding! Dcollins52 (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC) Cuz Ill be in NC in 3 or 4 weeks, and almost no internet there. So ill start when I get back. Thanks. Dcollins52 (talk) 21:19, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

RfA thankspam

Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 61/52/7; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.

Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board.

Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message!

Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Dendodge TalkContribs, 17:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Review of Article Quality

How can I get someone to review the quality of the article for Poptropica? It seems better than start class now. Vltava 68 09:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

apologies

im sorry for any offensive messages i did or did not place on ur page.

editor review for me

I know i may be early but please participate you can find my editor review at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_review/DCollins52

please tell me what to work on. Cheers Dcollins52Tell me what you think 18:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

RfA votes

I dunno. To break the monotony, I guess? I'm a bit strange that way. :P Why do you ask? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D 12:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Lol, that would be amusing. No, I'm just odd. :D Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D 14:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

offensive messages??

what do you mean? Sorry, just let me know what you find offensive. once I know what messages Wikipeda and/or you find offensive, I will make sure not to post things like that again., and no I didnt know about WP:COOL Thanks! I hope not to run into more misunderstandings, with anyone, especially my adopted WikiDad lol. subst: Smile


Cheers,Dcollins52Tell me what you think 23:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Spice Girls Billboard Boxscore

Hi, i read on the Spice Girls Comeback Tour page that you edited the Billboard Boxscore page. What i wanted to know was how did you find their tour grosses for Spain and Germany when i didn't think they had been reported to Billboard? Thanks, Stephen,User:StephenN17 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.102.103.14 (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Photos

John, how do u post photos? I wanna post some for ICS. So, yeah... --Florence Lau 14:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Florencelau (talkcontribs)

GA: Treasure Planet

Thank you so much for reviewing and passing Treasure Planet! That totally made my Christmas day. Thanks again, and happy holidays to you! :D --SilentAria talk 09:48, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

GA: Mongolian language

I already posted such a comment on the review page, but as I'm not sure if you're watching it, I'll post it here as well:

I originally fancied that the article on Mongolian language is rather thoroughly sourced, so I am surprised that it should not pass on exactly this criterion. Well, I'm not totally surprised as most of the content predated the reference and I was very busy adding a great lot of references for previously unsourced material. Now there should be little if any problems to supply missing citations - in principle. But in practice, I did check this article for missing quotations quite a few times and I think it is unlikely that I find exactly the information that you still considered unreferenced. Thus, it would be of extraordinary importance that you point out just where you think citations are missing. The [citation needed]-template would do the job. If you do so, I shall be able to supply all missing citations or delete the unsourced content until 2009-1-10, probably earlier. But as vague as it is now, I'm unable to make use of your critique and improve the article. G Purevdorj (talk) 22:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Jennifer Brunner GAR

Jennifer Brunner has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

It isn't obvious to me that anyone at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jennifer Brunner/1 has figured out what things you thought were POV in the paragraphs you cited in the review. Would you care to point out which things you felt were POV in each of the paragraphs that you mentioned.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
If you have any intent to be helpful, point out a sentence or two from each paragraph that you said was POV. Then, I can fix them.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Last I looked, no one could point out any of the POV in the sections you noted in your review. I need help fixing the article. Please point to the stuff you were talking about, so I can fix it.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Editor Review

I put up an editor review for myself a few days ago; would you mind commenting? (It still seems rather blank, apart from my answered questions.) There are links on my user and talk pages. Vltava 68 02:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

How about now? Vltava 68 07:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)