Jump to content

Ian Stevenson: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Noirtist (talk | contribs)
final act: fixing sources so text meets the irrelevant WP:V
this version is much better and addresses some of my concerns on discussion page
Line 31: Line 31:
Stevenson was known for his study of [[reincarnation]], which he termed the survival of the personality after death. He traveled extensively for 40 years to investigate 3,000 childhood cases that suggested to him the possibility of past lives.<ref name=tele/> Stevenson saw reincarnation as an explanation for a range of phobias and unusual abilities, although he never suggested a physical process by which a personality might survive death.<ref name=ShroderFeb11/> He studied topics such as [[near-death experiences]] and [[Apparitional experience|apparitions]] (death-bed visions), as well as more mainstream topics such as tissue [[oxidation]], [[psychosomatic medicine]], the [[mind-body dichotomy]] and [[psychedelic drugs]].<ref>[http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/psychiatric/stevenson.cfm Ian Stevenson, MD], University of Virginia Health System, accessed July 7, 2009.</ref>
Stevenson was known for his study of [[reincarnation]], which he termed the survival of the personality after death. He traveled extensively for 40 years to investigate 3,000 childhood cases that suggested to him the possibility of past lives.<ref name=tele/> Stevenson saw reincarnation as an explanation for a range of phobias and unusual abilities, although he never suggested a physical process by which a personality might survive death.<ref name=ShroderFeb11/> He studied topics such as [[near-death experiences]] and [[Apparitional experience|apparitions]] (death-bed visions), as well as more mainstream topics such as tissue [[oxidation]], [[psychosomatic medicine]], the [[mind-body dichotomy]] and [[psychedelic drugs]].<ref>[http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/psychiatric/stevenson.cfm Ian Stevenson, MD], University of Virginia Health System, accessed July 7, 2009.</ref>


Stevenson's work tended to polarize opinion, and while his supporters saw him as a misunderstood genius, his detractors thought him gullible and superstitious.<ref name=Fox/> Critics of Stevenson's reincarnation research, including philosopher [[Paul Kurtz]], have described it as [[pseudoscience]],<ref name=kurtsPS>{{cite journal |author=Kurtz P. |title=Two Sources of Unreason in Democratic Society: The paranormal and religion |journal=Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |volume=775 |pages=493 - 504 |year=2006 |doi=10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb23166.x |url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119242621/abstract}}</ref> or otherwise questioned his methods and conclusions.<ref name=kurtsPS /><ref name="shermer" /> While the ''[[Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease]] (JNMD)'' devoted most of one issue to his work in 1977,<ref name=ShroderFeb11/><ref name=Brody>Brody, Eugene B. [http://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Citation/1977/09000/Research_in_Reincarnation_and_Editorial.1.aspx Research in Reincarnation and Editorial Responsibility: An Editorial], ''The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease''. September, 1977.</ref> and some in the scientific community have stated that Stevenson's work was conducted with appropriate [[scientific method|scientific]] rigor,<ref name=Brody/><ref name=BMJ>Janice Hopkins Tanne. [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/334/7595/700 Obituaries: Ian Pretyman Stevenson], ''British Medical Journal''. April 2, 2007.</ref><ref name=Lief>Lief, Harold. [http://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Citation/1977/09000/Commentary_on_Dr__Ian_Stevenson_s__the_Evidence_of.3.aspx Commentary on Ian Stevenson’s "The Evidence of Man’s Survival After Death"], ''The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease''.</ref> for the most part his conclusions gained little support from other scientists.<ref name=ShroderFeb11/>
Stevenson's work tended to polarize opinion, and while his supporters saw him as a misunderstood genius, his detractors thought him gullible and superstitious.<ref name=Fox/> His conclusions gained little support from within the scientific community.<ref name=ShroderFeb11/> In 1977 the ''[[Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease]] (JNMD)'' devoted most of one issue to his work, containing both criticism and praise.<ref name=ShroderFeb11/><ref name=Brody>Brody, Eugene B. [http://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Citation/1977/09000/Research_in_Reincarnation_and_Editorial.1.aspx Research in Reincarnation and Editorial Responsibility: An Editorial], ''The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease''. September, 1977.</ref> Critics of Stevenson's reincarnation research, including philosopher [[Paul Kurtz]], have described it as [[pseudoscience]],<ref name=kurtsPS>{{cite journal |author=Kurtz P. |title=Two Sources of Unreason in Democratic Society: The paranormal and religion |journal=Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |volume=775 |pages=493 - 504 |year=2006 |doi=10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb23166.x |url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119242621/abstract}}</ref> or otherwise questioned Stevenson's methods and conclusions.<ref name=kurtsPS /><ref name="shermer" /> Some in the scientific community have however stated that his work was conducted with appropriate [[scientific method|scientific]] rigor, but did not support his conclusions.<ref name=ShroderFeb11/><ref name=Brody /><ref name="shermer" /><ref name=BMJ>Janice Hopkins Tanne. [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/334/7595/700 Obituaries: Ian Pretyman Stevenson], ''British Medical Journal''. April 2, 2007.</ref><ref name=Lief>Lief, Harold. [http://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Citation/1977/09000/Commentary_on_Dr__Ian_Stevenson_s__the_Evidence_of.3.aspx Commentary on Ian Stevenson’s "The Evidence of Man’s Survival After Death"], ''The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease''.</ref>


Stevenson was the author of several books, including ''[[Reincarnation and Biology]]: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects'' (1997) and ''Children Who Remember Previous Lives: A Question of Reincarnation'' (1987). Stevenson was the subject of Tom Shroder's ''[[Old Souls|Old Souls: The Scientific Evidence for Past Lives]]'' (1999).<ref name=Fox/>
Stevenson was the author of several books, including ''[[Reincarnation and Biology]]: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects'' (1997) and ''Children Who Remember Previous Lives: A Question of Reincarnation'' (1987). Stevenson was the subject of Tom Shroder's ''[[Old Souls|Old Souls: The Scientific Evidence for Past Lives]]'' (1999).<ref name=Fox/>

Revision as of 08:28, 17 August 2009

Ian Stevenson
File:Ian Stevenson.jpg
Born(1918-10-31)October 31, 1918
DiedFebruary 8, 2007(2007-02-08) (aged 88)
Alma materSt. Andrews University, McGill University
Known forReincarnation research
Scientific career
FieldsBiochemistry, psychiatry, parapsychology
InstitutionsUniversity of Virginia

Ian Pretyman Stevenson, MD, (October 31, 1918–February 8, 2007) was a Canadian biochemist and professor of psychiatry. Until his retirement in 2002, he was head of the Division of Perceptual Studies at the University of Virginia, one of a small number of academic facilities around the world that study the paranormal.[1]

Stevenson was known for his study of reincarnation, which he termed the survival of the personality after death. He traveled extensively for 40 years to investigate 3,000 childhood cases that suggested to him the possibility of past lives.[2] Stevenson saw reincarnation as an explanation for a range of phobias and unusual abilities, although he never suggested a physical process by which a personality might survive death.[3] He studied topics such as near-death experiences and apparitions (death-bed visions), as well as more mainstream topics such as tissue oxidation, psychosomatic medicine, the mind-body dichotomy and psychedelic drugs.[4]

Stevenson's work tended to polarize opinion, and while his supporters saw him as a misunderstood genius, his detractors thought him gullible and superstitious.[1] His conclusions gained little support from within the scientific community.[3] In 1977 the Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (JNMD) devoted most of one issue to his work, containing both criticism and praise.[3][5] Critics of Stevenson's reincarnation research, including philosopher Paul Kurtz, have described it as pseudoscience,[6] or otherwise questioned Stevenson's methods and conclusions.[6][7] Some in the scientific community have however stated that his work was conducted with appropriate scientific rigor, but did not support his conclusions.[3][5][7][8][9]

Stevenson was the author of several books, including Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects (1997) and Children Who Remember Previous Lives: A Question of Reincarnation (1987). Stevenson was the subject of Tom Shroder's Old Souls: The Scientific Evidence for Past Lives (1999).[1]

Biography

Early life and education

Stevenson was raised in Ottawa, where his Scottish father was the Canadian correspondent for The Times of London. His mother had an interest in theosophy, and Stevenson would later credit her vast library on the subject as triggering his own interest in the paranormal.[1] As a child Stevenson was often bedridden due to bouts of bronchitis, a condition that would continue throughout his adult life,[8] and lead to the lifelong voracious reading habit which saw him read over 3500 books according to the list he kept since 1935.[10]

He studied medicine at St. Andrews University in Scotland, and at McGill University in Montreal, receiving from a BSc in 1942 and a degree in medicine in 1943, graduating top of his class.[3]

Early career

Following graduation, Stevenson took a series of jobs in hospitals as an intern or resident, before embarking on research at Tulane University focusing on biochemical tissue oxidation. He became interested in finding explanations for psychosomatic illnesses and in the late 1940s he worked at New York Hospital as part of a team exploring psychosomatic medicine, a theme that persisted throughout his later research.[11] This work persuaded him that the reductionism of biochemistry rendered it inadequate as an explanatory tool, and he chose to pursue psychiatry over internal medicine.[2][11]

After training as a psychiatrist, Stevenson taught at Louisiana State University. In the 1950s, inspired by a meeting with Aldous Huxley, he was involved in the early medical study of the effects of LSD and mescaline. He experimented with LSD himself, describing three days of "perfect serenity" and commenting, "I could never be angry again. As it happens that didn't work out, but the memory of it persisted as something to hope for."[2]

In 1957, he was appointed head of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Virginia. His early scientific research included psychosomatic illnesses, as well as writing textbooks on interviewing patients and psychiatric examinations.[12]

Research interests

Criticism of psychoanalysis

Early in his career Stevenson became a controversial figure amongst psychoanalysts. He opposed what he saw as the determinism of Sigmund Freud, arguing that there was little room for free will if a person's character was formed almost entirely by their experiences as an infant. His 1957 paper questioning whether personality was more plastic in childhood than adulthood provoked strong reactions from psychoanalysts.[13] He said later that the rejection of his views in these cases helped prepare him for the rejection he experienced with his work on paranormal phenomena.[12]

Interest in the paranormal

Stevenson came to see both behaviorism and psychoanalysis as unable to explain the formation of individual characteristics and personality. In the late 1950s, he reviewed "cases suggestive of reincarnation", and was impressed by certain similarities among published reports, particularly that a significant proportion of subjects were under the age of 10 when they apparently recalled past lives.[12] He started collecting and investigating cases of children who seemed to recall past lives, without using hypnosis. After publishing a paper on reincarnation in 1960, Stevenson was invited to travel to India and Sri Lanka by self-professed psychic and founder of the Parapsychology Foundation Eileen J. Garrett. The trip convinced him that the child cases were plentiful and impressive. Around the time of his first visits to India, inventor Chester Carlson began to offer financial support for his work,[11] and when Carlson died in 1968 he left $1 million to endow a Chair at the University of Virginia, and a further $1 million for Stevenson himself to continue his research into reincarnation.[2]

Division of Personality Studies

Carlson's bequest enabled Stevenson to set up the Division of Personality Studies at the University of Virginia, with the founding principle of conducting "scientific empirical investigation of phenomena that suggest that currently accepted scientific assumptions and theories about the nature of mind or consciousness, and its relationship to matter, may be incomplete."[14] It remains one of several academic departments in the world dedicated to the study of paranormal phenomena. It was later renamed The Division of Perceptual Studies (DOPS) with Stevenson appointed as Director.[3] Stevenson resisted efforts to have the word "parapsychology" used to describe his department and research, arguing that his work was distinct from parapsychology, and was an extension of his more mainstream psychiatric work.[12]

Reincarnation research

Stevenson traveled extensively to conduct field research into reincarnation and investigated cases in Africa, Alaska, Europe, India and both North and South America, logging around 55,000 miles a year between 1966 and 1971.[2] He reported that the children he studied usually started to speak of their supposed past lives between the ages of two and four, then ceased to do so by seven or eight, with frequent mentions of having died a violent death, and what seemed to be clear memories of the manner of death.[2] After interviewing the children, their families, and others, Stevenson would attempt to identify if there had been a living person who satisfied the various claims and descriptions collected, and who had died prior to the child's birth.

Stevenson's research is associated with a 'minimalist' model of reincarnation that makes no religious claims. According to Robert Almeder, the central feature of this model is that "There is something essential to some human personalities, however we ultimately characterize it, which we cannot plausibly construe solely in terms of either brain states, or properties of brain states, or biological properties caused by the brain and, further, after biological death this non-reducible essential trait sometimes persists for some time, in some way, in some place, and for some reason or other, existing independently of the person's former brain and body. Moreover, after some time, some of these irreducible essential traits of human personality, for some reason or other, and by some mechanism or other, come to reside in other human bodies either some time during the gestation period, at birth, or shortly after birth."[15]

Stevenson believed the strongest cases he had collected in support of this model involved both testimony and physical evidence. In over 40 of these cases Stevenson gathered physical evidence relating to the often rare and unusual birthmarks and birth defects of children which he claimed matched wounds recorded in the medical or post-mortem records for the individual Stevenson identified as the past-life personality.[16]

The children in Stevenson's studies often behaved in ways he felt suggestive of a link to the previous life. These children would display emotions toward members of the previous family consistent with their claimed past life, e.g., deferring to a husband or bossing around a former younger brother or sister who by that time was actually much older than the child in question. Many of these children also displayed phillias and phobias associated to the manner of their death, with over half who described a violent death being fearful of associated devices. Many of the children also incorporated elements of their claimed previous occupation into their play, while others would act out their claimed death repeatedly.[17]

Tom Shroder said Stevenson's fieldwork technique was that of a detective or investigative reporter, searching for alternative explanations of the material he was offered. One boy in Beirut described being a 25-year-old mechanic who died after being hit by a speeding car on a beach road. Witnesses said the boy gave the name of the driver, as well as the names of his sisters, parents, and cousins, and the location of the crash. The details matched the life of a man who had died years before the child was born, and who was apparently unconnected to the child's family. In such cases, Stevenson sought alternative explanations—that the child had discovered the information in a normal way, that the witnesses were lying to him or to themselves, or that the case boiled down to coincidence. Shroder writes that, in scores of cases, no alternative explanation seemed to suffice.[3]

Stevenson argued that the 3,000 or so cases he studied supported the possibility of reincarnation, though he was always careful to refer to them as "cases suggestive of reincarnation," or "cases of the reincarnation type".[3] He also recognized a limitation, or what Paul Edwards calls the "modus operandi problem", namely the absence of evidence of a physical process by which a personality could survive death and travel to another body.[3] Against this, Robert Almeder argues that "you many not know how something occurs but have plenty of evidence that it occurs".[18][19][20] Recent work by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff on quantum consciousness has been suggested as hinting at a possible mechanism for the persistence of consciousness after death.[21]

Reception

Stevenson’s conclusions gained little support from within the scientific community, although Eugene Brody has suggested many of them simply dismiss ideas like reincarnation.[5] While Stevenson published his research in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and three scientific commentators have stated that Stevenson rigorously followed the scientific method in conducting his research,[8][9][5] for the most part the scientific community ignored Stevenson's reincarnation work.[3]

In 1977 the Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease devoted most of one issue to Stevenson's work. In an editorial for that issue, psychiatrist Eugene Brody explained the decision to publish research that might normally be regarded as unscientific due to the "scientific and personal credibility of the authors, the legitimacy of their research methods, and the conformity of their reasoning to the usual canons of rational thought".[5] In the same issue psychiatrist Harold Lief wrote in a commentary: "Either [Stevenson] is making a colossal mistake, or he will be known ... as 'the Galileo of the 20th century'."

Stevenson's work has drawn criticism from skeptical groups and individuals such as The Skeptics Society[7] and Robert Todd Carroll, while philosopher Paul Edwards included a lengthy criticism of Stevenson's work in his book Reincarnation: A Critical Examination. In each of these critiques, the authors question both the methods used and the evidence gathered by Stevenson, and offer alternate, more mainstream, explanations for the types of cases Stevenson argued were suggestive of reincarnation. Philosopher Paul Kurtz, founder of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, has gone further and suggested Stevenson's reincarnation research is pseudoscience. By contrast, in his books Death and Personal Survival and Beyond Death: The Evidence for Life After Death, philosopher Robert Almeder endorsed Stevenson's research and concluded that the evidence he assembled argues strongly in favor of reincarnation, to the point of it being irrational to disbelieve that some people reincarnate.[22][23][24]

Stevenson’s work also attracted the attention of Carl Sagan and Arthur C. Clarke who, while intrigued, felt it fell short of providing proof of reincarnation, which they both viewed as unlikely. In The Demon-Haunted World (1996), Sagan wrote that claims about reincarnation have some, though dubious, experimental support, arguing that one of three claims in parapsychology deserving serious study is that, "young children sometimes report details of a previous life, which upon checking turn out to be accurate and which they could not have known about in any other way than reincarnation."[25] Similarly, Clarke agreed that Stevenson had produced a number of studies that were hard to explain, but also noted that a major problem for reincarnation was the lack of any known physical mechanisms that could account for personality transfer.[26] Sam Harris said of Stevenson "either he is a victim of truly elaborate fraud, or something interesting is going on".[27]

Retirement

After the 1984 death of his wife Octavia, Stevenson married Margaret Pertzoff in 1985. He retired in 2002, although the Department of Perceptual Studies continues his work.[14] Bruce Greyson has taken over as the Director while Jim Tucker, a child psychiatrist, is continuing Stevenson's reincarnation research with children, focusing on North American cases[28] and exploring possible mechanisms for personality transfer.[29]

Tucker said that toward the end of his life, Stevenson felt his long-stated goal of getting science to consider reincarnation as a possibility was not going to be realized in this lifetime.[3] According to his University of Virginia obituary, his greatest frustration was not that people dismissed his theories, but that in his opinion most did so without even reading the evidence he had assembled.[2][10] Stevenson died of pneumonia at the Blue Ridge Retirement community in Charlottesville, Virginia, on February 8, 2007.[3]

The locked cabinet

Nearly 40 years ago, Stevenson bought and set a combination lock on a filing cabinet in the Division of Perceptual Studies. He based the combination on a mnemonic device known only to him, possibly a word or a sentence.[1]

A colleague, Emily Williams Kelly, told The New York Times: "He did say, that if he found himself able, he would try to communicate that. Presumably, if someone had a vivid dream about him, in which there seemed to be a word or a phrase that kept being repeated—I don't quite know how it would work—if it seemed promising enough, we would try to open it using the combination suggested." As of February 2007, the Times reports, the filing cabinet remains locked.[1]

Bibliography

Selected books

  • Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation. (1966). (Second revised and enlarged edition 1974), University of Virginia Press, ISBN 0813908728
  • Cases of the Reincarnation Type Vol. I: Ten Cases in India, (1975). University of Virginia Press.
  • Cases of the Reincarnation Type Vol. II: Ten Cases in Sri Lanka. (1978). University of Virginia Press.
  • Cases of the Reincarnation Type Vol. III: Twelve Cases in Lebanon and Turkey. (1980). University of Virginia Press.
  • Cases of the Reincarnation Type Vol. IV: Twelve Cases in Thailand and Burma. (1983). University of Virginia Press.
  • Unlearned Language: New Studies in Xenoglossy. (1984). University of Virginia Press, ISBN 0813909945
  • Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects Volume 1: Birthmarks and Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects Volume 2: Birth Defects and Other Anomalies. (1997). (2 volumes), Praeger Publishers, ISBN 0-275-95282-7
  • Where Reincarnation and Biology Intersect. (1997). Praeger Publishers, ISBN 0-275-95282-7 . (A short and non-technical version of the scientific two-volumes work, for the general reader)
  • Children Who Remember Previous Lives: A Quest of Reincarnation. (2001). McFarland & Company, ISBN 0-7864-0913-4 , (A general non-technical introduction into reincarnation-research)
  • European Cases of the Reincarnation Type. (2003). McFarland & Company, ISBN 0786414588

Selected articles

  • "The Explanatory Value of the Idea of Reincarnation" (1977) Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 164:305-326.
  • "American Children Who Claim to Remember Previous Lives" (1983) Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 171:742-748.
  • "The Belief in Reincarnation Among the Igbo of Nigeria" (1985) Journal of Asian and African Studies, XX:13-30.
  • "Characteristics of Cases of the Reincarnation Type Among the Igbo of Nigeria" (1986) Journal of Asian and African Studies, XXI:204-216.
  • "Birthmarks and Birth Defects Corresponding to Wounds on Deceased Persons", (1993). Journal of Scientific Exploration, 7:403-410.
  • (with Cook, E.W., Greyson, B.) (1998). "Do Any Near-Death Experiences Provide Evidence for the Survival of Human Personality after Death? Relevant Features and Illustrative Case Reports",Journal of Scientific Exploration, 12(3): 377-406.
  • "Past lives of twins"(1999). Lancet, Apr 17; 353(9161):1359-60. (Letter to editor)
  • "The phenomenon of claimed memories of previous lives: possible interpretations and importance"(2000). Medical Hypotheses, 54(4), 652-659.
  • "Ropelike Birthmarks on Children Who Claim to Remember Past Lives" (2001). Psychological Reports, Aug 89(1):142-144.
  • (with Pasricha, S.K., Keil, J. and J.B. Tucker), (2005). "Some Bodily Malformations Attributed to Previous Lives" Journal of Scientific Exploration 19(3):359-383.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f Fox, Margalit. Ian Stevenson Dies at 88; Studied Claims of Past Lives, The New York Times, February 18, 2007.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Professor Ian Stevenson, The Daily Telegraph, February 12, 2007.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Shroder, Tom. Ian Stevenson; Sought To Document Memories Of Past Lives in Children, The Washington Post, February 11, 2007.
  4. ^ Ian Stevenson, MD, University of Virginia Health System, accessed July 7, 2009.
  5. ^ a b c d e Brody, Eugene B. Research in Reincarnation and Editorial Responsibility: An Editorial, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. September, 1977.
  6. ^ a b Kurtz P. (2006). "Two Sources of Unreason in Democratic Society: The paranormal and religion". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 775: 493–504. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb23166.x.
  7. ^ a b c The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience by Michael Shermer & Pat Linse, 2002, ISBN 1576076539
  8. ^ a b c Janice Hopkins Tanne. Obituaries: Ian Pretyman Stevenson, British Medical Journal. April 2, 2007.
  9. ^ a b Lief, Harold. Commentary on Ian Stevenson’s "The Evidence of Man’s Survival After Death", The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.
  10. ^ a b Emily Williams Kelly. Ian Stevenson Obituary, University of Virginia Health System, February 2007.
  11. ^ a b c Stevenson, Ian. Some of my journeys in medicine, The Flora Levy Lecture in the Humanities, 1989.
  12. ^ a b c d Stevenson, Ian (2006). "Half A Career With the Paranormal", Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 13–21.
  13. ^ Stevenson, I. (1957). "Is the human personality more plastic in infancy and childhood?", American Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 152–161.
  14. ^ a b History and description, Division of Perceptual Studies, University of Virginia.
  15. ^ http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_11_4_almeder.pdf
  16. ^ Stevenson, Ian (1992). Birthmarks and Birth Defects Corresponding to Wounds on Deceased Persons, paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Scientific Exploration, Princeton University, June 11–13, 1992.
  17. ^ Reincarnation. JIM B. TUCKER. Macmillan Encyclopedia of Death and Dying. Ed. Robert Kastenbaum. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2002. p705-710. 2 vols. p.707
  18. ^ Beyond Death: The Evidence for Life After Death. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, (1987) Translated into Japanese (1991).
  19. ^ Death and Personal Survival. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, (Spring 1992), 291 pages.
  20. ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZhMDU9GcVg | convenience link to Almeder interview
  21. ^ http://discovermagazine.com/2007/jun/soul-search/article_view?b_start:int=2&-C=
  22. ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZhMDU9GcVg | convenience link to Almeder interview summarising his position
  23. ^ Robert F. Almeder. Death and personal survival, Rowman and Littlefield, 1992, p.82.
  24. ^ Beyond Death: The Evidence for Life After Death. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, (l987) Translated into Japanese (l991).
  25. ^ Sagan, Carl. The Demon-Haunted World, Random House, 1997, p. 302; also see Butziger, R. (2006). "A Scientific Look at Reincarnation", PsycCRITIQUES, 51(22), May 31, 2006, p. 282.
  26. ^ http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/clarke_19_2.html
  27. ^ http://www.alternet.org/story/46196/
  28. ^ Division Staff, Division of Perceptual Studies, University of Virginia.
  29. ^ Tucker JB. Life Before Life: A Scientic Investigation of Children's Memories of Previous Lives New York: St. Martin's Press, 2005, 256pp. ISBN 0-312-32137-

Further reading