Talk:List of Scientologists: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot I (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 30d) to Talk:List of Scientologists/Archive 1. |
→Really?: whatever |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Must we include officials in the Church of Scientology as part of a list of Scientologists? Isn't that kind of an obvious given? [[Special:Contributions/38.109.88.194|38.109.88.194]] ([[User talk:38.109.88.194|talk]]) 22:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
Must we include officials in the Church of Scientology as part of a list of Scientologists? Isn't that kind of an obvious given? [[Special:Contributions/38.109.88.194|38.109.88.194]] ([[User talk:38.109.88.194|talk]]) 22:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Not obvious actually, and quite useful. All individuals with an existing Wikipedia entry who are Scientologists should be on here. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 22:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
:Not obvious actually, and quite useful. All individuals with an existing Wikipedia entry who are Scientologists should be on here. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 22:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
::I'll let it stand because I'm really not in the mood to have a ton of Scientologists arrive and descend upon this thread, but given the nature of privacy which Scientology is well-known for (see the Scientology article for details), it seems QUITE obvious. Kind of hard to find many atheists running for Pope, you know? Especially in with Scientological religious, political, and financial practices. Back to your home planet, now. [[Special:Contributions/38.109.88.194|38.109.88.194]] ([[User talk:38.109.88.194|talk]]) 01:07, 9 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:07, 9 December 2009
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Scientologists article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Really?
Must we include officials in the Church of Scientology as part of a list of Scientologists? Isn't that kind of an obvious given? 38.109.88.194 (talk) 22:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Not obvious actually, and quite useful. All individuals with an existing Wikipedia entry who are Scientologists should be on here. Cirt (talk) 22:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'll let it stand because I'm really not in the mood to have a ton of Scientologists arrive and descend upon this thread, but given the nature of privacy which Scientology is well-known for (see the Scientology article for details), it seems QUITE obvious. Kind of hard to find many atheists running for Pope, you know? Especially in with Scientological religious, political, and financial practices. Back to your home planet, now. 38.109.88.194 (talk) 01:07, 9 December 2009 (UTC)