Jump to content

The Elements of Style: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 3 edits by 216.234.145.123; WP:RS. (TW)
→‎Criticism: Put in citation to comments appearing in the Chronicle (already cited)
Line 48: Line 48:
{{quote|The book’s toxic mix of purism, atavism, and personal eccentricity is not underpinned by a proper grounding in English grammar. It is often so misguided that the authors appear not to notice their own egregious flouting of its own rules . . . It’s sad. Several generations of college students learned their grammar from the uninformed bossiness of Strunk and White, and the result is a nation of educated people who know they feel vaguely anxious and insecure whenever they write 'however' or 'than me' or 'was' or 'which,' but can’t tell you why.<ref name="pullum-50years">{{cite journal | last=Pullum | first=Geoffrey K | authorlink=Geoffrey Pullum | date=17 April 2009 | title=50 Years of Stupid Grammar Advice | journal=[[The Chronicle of Higher Education]] | volume=55 | issue=32 | pages=B15 | url=http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i32/32b01501.htm | format=fee required | accessdate=2009-04-12}}</ref>}}
{{quote|The book’s toxic mix of purism, atavism, and personal eccentricity is not underpinned by a proper grounding in English grammar. It is often so misguided that the authors appear not to notice their own egregious flouting of its own rules . . . It’s sad. Several generations of college students learned their grammar from the uninformed bossiness of Strunk and White, and the result is a nation of educated people who know they feel vaguely anxious and insecure whenever they write 'however' or 'than me' or 'was' or 'which,' but can’t tell you why.<ref name="pullum-50years">{{cite journal | last=Pullum | first=Geoffrey K | authorlink=Geoffrey Pullum | date=17 April 2009 | title=50 Years of Stupid Grammar Advice | journal=[[The Chronicle of Higher Education]] | volume=55 | issue=32 | pages=B15 | url=http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i32/32b01501.htm | format=fee required | accessdate=2009-04-12}}</ref>}}


Specifically, Pullum says Strunk and White were misguided in identifying the [[English passive voice|passive voice]] as incorrect, and in proscribing established usages such as the [[split infinitive]] and the use of "which" in a restrictive [[English relative clause#That_and_which|relative clause]].<ref name="pullum-50years"/> He also frequently criticizes ''Elements'' on ''[[Language Log]]'', a linguists' blog focusing on portrayals of language in the popular media, for promoting [[linguistic prescriptivism]] and [[hypercorrection]] among English speakers,<ref>See, "[http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1505 Sotomayor loves Strunk and White]" (Geoffrey Pullum, 12 June 2009), "[http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1485 Drinking the Strunkian Kool-Aid]" (Geoffrey Pullum, 6 June 2009), "[http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1369 Room for debate on Strunk and White]" (Geoffrey Pullum, 25 April 2009), and other postings on the subject, tagged as [http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?cat=5 prescriptivist poppycock] (retrieved on 13 June 2009).</ref> referring to it as "the book that ate America's brain".<ref>{{cite web | last=Pullum | first=Geoffrey K | authorlink=Geoffrey Pullum | date=12 June 2009 | accessdate=13 June 2009 | work=[[Language Log]] | url=http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1505 | title=Sotomayer loves Strunk and White}}</ref>
Specifically, and not without controversy,<ref>http://chronicle.com/forums/index.php/topic,59501.0.html</ref> Pullum states that Strunk and White were misguided in identifying the [[English passive voice|passive voice]] as incorrect, and in proscribing established usages such as the [[split infinitive]] and the use of "which" in a restrictive [[English relative clause#That_and_which|relative clause]].<ref name="pullum-50years"/> He also frequently criticizes ''Elements'' on ''[[Language Log]]'', a linguists' blog focusing on portrayals of language in the popular media, for promoting [[linguistic prescriptivism]] and [[hypercorrection]] among English speakers,<ref>See, "[http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1505 Sotomayor loves Strunk and White]" (Geoffrey Pullum, 12 June 2009), "[http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1485 Drinking the Strunkian Kool-Aid]" (Geoffrey Pullum, 6 June 2009), "[http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1369 Room for debate on Strunk and White]" (Geoffrey Pullum, 25 April 2009), and other postings on the subject, tagged as [http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?cat=5 prescriptivist poppycock] (retrieved on 13 June 2009).</ref> referring to it as "the book that ate America's brain".<ref>{{cite web | last=Pullum | first=Geoffrey K | authorlink=Geoffrey Pullum | date=12 June 2009 | accessdate=13 June 2009 | work=[[Language Log]] | url=http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1505 | title=Sotomayer loves Strunk and White}}</ref>


The ''[[Boston Globe]]'s'' review of the 2005 illustrated edition describes it as an "aging zombie of a book ... a hodgepodge, its now-antiquated pet peeves jostling for space with 1970s taboos and 1990s computer advice."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2005/10/23/frankenstrunk/|title=Frankenstrunk|last=Freeman|first=Jan|date=23 October 2005|work=[[The Boston Globe]]|accessdate=2009-04-12}}</ref>
The ''[[Boston Globe]]'s'' review of the 2005 illustrated edition describes it as an "aging zombie of a book ... a hodgepodge, its now-antiquated pet peeves jostling for space with 1970s taboos and 1990s computer advice."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2005/10/23/frankenstrunk/|title=Frankenstrunk|last=Freeman|first=Jan|date=23 October 2005|work=[[The Boston Globe]]|accessdate=2009-04-12}}</ref>

Revision as of 22:29, 28 January 2010

The Elements of Style
Cover of 4th ed. (paperback, 2000)
AuthorWilliam Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White
LanguageEnglish
SubjectStyle guide
PublisherPearson Education Company
Publication date
1919, 1959
Publication placeUSA
Media typePaperback book
Pages105
ISBN020530902X
OCLC45802070
808/.042 21
LC ClassPE1408 .S772 1999

The Elements of Style (1918) (aka Strunk & White), by William Strunk, Jr., and E. B. White, is an American English writing style guide. It is one of the best-known and most influential prescriptive treatment of English grammar and usage, and often is required reading in U.S. high school and university composition classes[citation needed]. The original, 1918 edition of The Elements of Style detailed eight elementary rules of usage, ten elementary principles of composition, “a few matters of form”, and a list of commonly misused words and expressions.

History

Cornell University professor of English William Strunk, Jr., wrote The Elements of Style in 1918, privately published it in 1919, and first revised it in 1935, assisted by editor Edward A. Tenney. In 1957, at The New Yorker magazine, the style guide reached the attention of writer E. B. White, who had studied writing under Strunk in 1919, but had since forgotten the "little book" that he described as a "forty-three-page summation of the case for cleanliness, accuracy, and brevity in the use of English".[1]

Weeks later, he wrote a feature story lauding the professor’s devotion to lucid written English prose. Meantime, Macmillan and Company publishers had commissioned White to revise The Elements of Style, then forty-one years old, for a 1959 edition — because Strunk had died thirteen years earlier, in 1946. His expansion and modernization of the 1935 revised edition yielded the new writing style manual — since known as Strunk & White — whose first revised edition sold some two million copies. Since 1959, the total sales of three editions of the book, in four decades, exceeded ten million copies.[2]

In the 1918 original edition, Strunk concentrates upon specific questions of usage, the cultivation of good writing, and avoiding overwriting, by recommending: "Make every word tell". One composition principle, the 17th, is the simple instruction: "Omit needless words."[3] The 1959 edition features White’s updated expansions of those sections, the "Introduction" essay (derived from his Strunk feature story), and the concluding chapter, "An Approach to Style", a broader, prescriptive guide to writing in English.

Later, E.B. White updated the second (1972) and third (1979) editions of The Elements of Style, by which time it had grown to 85 pages. By publication of the fourth edition in 1999, though, the second author of Strunk and White had been dead fourteen years, since 1985. The fourth edition omits Strunk's advice to use masculine pronouns "unless the antecedent is or must be feminine",[4] noting that "many writers find the use of the generic he ... limiting or offensive".[5] It provides additional advice for avoiding an "unintentional emphasis on the masculine"[6] in the renamed entry “They. He or She.” in Chapter IV: Misused Words and Expressions.[7]

Then the Longman publishing company bought the rights to Strunk & White, and incorporated a foreword by Roger Angell (E.B. White’s stepson), an afterword by Charles Osgood, a glossary, and an index. Moreover, in 2005, The Elements of Style Illustrated, designed and illustrated by Maira Kalman containing the 1999 edition text, was published.

Contents overview — the Third Edition

The third edition of The Elements of Style (1979) features fifty-four points, a list of common word usage errors; eleven rules of punctuation and grammar; eleven principles of writing; eleven matters of form; and twenty-one reminders for a better style, in Chapter V, which White wrote alone. [8] Moreover, the final reminder, the 21st, “Prefer the standard to the offbeat” reads like a discrete essay.[8] To writers, White advises the proper mind-set, urging they write to please themselves, and to aim for, in the phrase of Robert Louis Stevenson, “one moment of felicity”.

Criticism

Edinburgh University linguistics professor Geoffrey Pullum has criticized The Elements of Style, saying:

The book’s toxic mix of purism, atavism, and personal eccentricity is not underpinned by a proper grounding in English grammar. It is often so misguided that the authors appear not to notice their own egregious flouting of its own rules . . . It’s sad. Several generations of college students learned their grammar from the uninformed bossiness of Strunk and White, and the result is a nation of educated people who know they feel vaguely anxious and insecure whenever they write 'however' or 'than me' or 'was' or 'which,' but can’t tell you why.[9]

Specifically, and not without controversy,[10] Pullum states that Strunk and White were misguided in identifying the passive voice as incorrect, and in proscribing established usages such as the split infinitive and the use of "which" in a restrictive relative clause.[9] He also frequently criticizes Elements on Language Log, a linguists' blog focusing on portrayals of language in the popular media, for promoting linguistic prescriptivism and hypercorrection among English speakers,[11] referring to it as "the book that ate America's brain".[12]

The Boston Globe's review of the 2005 illustrated edition describes it as an "aging zombie of a book ... a hodgepodge, its now-antiquated pet peeves jostling for space with 1970s taboos and 1990s computer advice."[13]

Editions in print

  • The Elements of Style (1999), 4th edition, hardcover, ISBN 0-205-31342-6
  • The Elements of Style (2000), 4th edition, paperback, ISBN 0-205-30902-X
  • The Elements of Style: A Style Guide for Writers (2005), by William Strunk, ISBN 0-97522-980-X
  • The Elements of Style Illustrated (2005), by William Strunk Jr., E.B. White and Maira Kalman (Illustrator), ISBN 1-59420-069-6
  • The Elements of Style by William Strunk Jr. & How To Speak And Write Correctly, by Joseph Devlin (2006), BN Publishing, ISBN 956-291-263-9
  • The Elements of Style Fiftieth Anniversary Edition (2009), hardcover, ISBN 0-978-0-205-63264-0 (contains the 4th edition text)

See also

References

  1. ^ The Elements of Style Fiftieth Anniversary Edition (2009), p. xiii, ISBN 0-978-0-205-63264-0
  2. ^ The Elements of Style Fiftieth Anniversary Edition (2009), p. x, ISBN 0-978-0-205-63264-0
  3. ^ The Elements of Style, Fiftieth Anniversary Edition (2009) p.23, ISBN 0-978-0-205-63264-0
  4. ^ Strunk, Jr., William (1972) [1918]. The Elements of Style (2nd ed.). Plain Label Books. pp. 55–56. ISBN 9781603030502. Retrieved 2009-07-23. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ Strunk, Jr., William (1999) [1918]. The Elements of Style (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. p. 60. ISBN 9780205313426. OCLC 41548201. Retrieved 2009-07-23. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ Strunk (1999), p. 60.
  7. ^ See the "they" entry in Chapter IV of the 1918 edition, and also gender-specific pronouns.
  8. ^ a b The Elements of Style, Fiftieth Anniversary Edition (2009) p.xiii, ISBN 0-978-0-205-63264-0
  9. ^ a b Pullum, Geoffrey K (17 April 2009). "50 Years of Stupid Grammar Advice" (fee required). The Chronicle of Higher Education. 55 (32): B15. Retrieved 2009-04-12.
  10. ^ http://chronicle.com/forums/index.php/topic,59501.0.html
  11. ^ See, "Sotomayor loves Strunk and White" (Geoffrey Pullum, 12 June 2009), "Drinking the Strunkian Kool-Aid" (Geoffrey Pullum, 6 June 2009), "Room for debate on Strunk and White" (Geoffrey Pullum, 25 April 2009), and other postings on the subject, tagged as prescriptivist poppycock (retrieved on 13 June 2009).
  12. ^ Pullum, Geoffrey K (12 June 2009). "Sotomayer loves Strunk and White". Language Log. Retrieved 13 June 2009.
  13. ^ Freeman, Jan (23 October 2005). "Frankenstrunk". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 2009-04-12.

External links