Jump to content

User talk:Gogo Dodo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by ShadowsOfRicky (talk) to last version by Gogo Dodo
Texas141 (talk | contribs)
new section
Line 165: Line 165:
:Actually, I was made aware of a similar sock a few months ago promoting the very site this past sock was promoting. I'll have to look through the archives for the name though. Thanks anyway. <sup>--[[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''Unquestionable'''</font>]][[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="green">'''Truth'''</font>]]--</sup> 06:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
:Actually, I was made aware of a similar sock a few months ago promoting the very site this past sock was promoting. I'll have to look through the archives for the name though. Thanks anyway. <sup>--[[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''Unquestionable'''</font>]][[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="green">'''Truth'''</font>]]--</sup> 06:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:3bulletproof16&diff=355487035&oldid=355486237 Replied] on your talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 06:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:3bulletproof16&diff=355487035&oldid=355486237 Replied] on your talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 06:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

==Page Protection==
Thank you for your recent revert of vandalism on the [[Dayton, Ohio]] article. This article has been a target of vandalism and silly edits of this kind for quite some time. I have listed the article for protection from such vandalism here [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]]. If there is any way that you may be able to help with watching the page for vandalism, or semi-protecting the article, that would be appriciated. Thanks. [[User:Texas141|Texas141]] ([[User talk:Texas141|talk]]) 19:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:27, 12 April 2010

  Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:
  • Use a descriptive subject/headline.
  • If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
  • Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
  • If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.

Click here to leave me a message

New user

Is there a place where I can ask questions? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Oooh Laa laah (talkcontribs) 05:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello Gogo Dodo. You might want to check this out: WP:AN/I#Personal attacks from User:Gogo Dodo. Cheers, -- Meäghân  talk  23:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Denied everything. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

You probably already saw this, which was started after this post. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A question regarding some articles you deleted a while ago

Hi Gogo Dodo, there is a couple of articles on German rugby players you deleted just over 2 years ago. I've recreated two of them but wonder whether they still qualify for deletion. Can you let me know before I create the rest? Its the players on the following template:

{{Germany rugby union squad 1900 Summer Olympics}}

Thanks, Calistemon (talk) 14:39, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clearing it up. I'm amazed you can remember why this articles were deleted two years ago, thats quite a while! Calistemon (talk) 00:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh no, you destroyed my believe in the all-knowing admins! Live on Wikipedia will never be the same! Next you telling me, its not the bunny rabits that will put out easter eggs for me this morning but my wife! Well, thanks nevertheless. Calistemon (talk) 00:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just testing

Yeah, sorry about that. I was just testing.--Ice Cooling15 (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Sockpuppet tag

Alright. I understand. Thanks for the help. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I had just tagged the page for speedy deletion. I could not place a warning on the creator's talk page, as it has been deleted before I could see the history. What should I do?--Nilotpal42 01:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thanks-Nilotpal42 01:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gogo Dodo! The page you just deleted has been recreated, with a db tag ironically enough. Just a heads up --Tommy (msg) 01:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing new

I just came here to say that I removed an abusive message by an IP address. Anyway, Have a nice day. Minimac (talk) 15:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sock of BrianTheVillain123

Hi! I noticed that a new user, BrianFairplay10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), has been making edits that resemble ones that BrianTheVillain made under his old account. Example: Bclrocks's edit and BrianFairplay's edit. Could be a coincidence, but the username also seems kind of suspicious too. I'd just thought I'd ask you what you thought before I opened a SPI or anything. Cheers, -- Meäghân  talk  13:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad he couldn't wait another day or so for the block to expire. Thank you for blocking the sock and his main account. Cheers, -- Meäghân  talk  19:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar :)

Sole Survivor Barnstar


For all your work helping out on Survivor articles, and for dealing with BrianTehVillain123, I hereby reward you the "Sole Survivor Barnstar". Enjoy! :) -- Meäghân  talk  01:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gogo Dodo, please take a look at this page and its history. I have left warnings on all relevant talk pages, but it's like herding cats. Yoroshiku Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question about "The Serenaders" page deletion

Heya - I'm totally fine with our band page on "The Serenaders" being deleted, but I was wondering what we needed to do to be significant. I read the bylaws about proving we're "notable" but are there any ideas on how we do become notable? If we have a published piece of music? Reviews in publications? Any help would be greatly appreciated - I've been a big fan of wikipedia for years, making edits wherever I can find time to help, and I've always dreamed of having a band on there. I now have a successful and professional band so I'm looking to get us documented on here. Thanks!

Danny —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aranamo (talkcontribs) 20:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Jaunciaton

Why did you delete my page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaunciaton (talkcontribs) 18:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC) STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaunciaton (talkcontribs) 18:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

I didnot know that i have no right to block or unblock,it was by mistake.BTW i block god of dreams,because it is very clear by edits of him and his sock account,same name and same edits.so i suggest you to block it or either do check user test,thank you--NothingImpossible (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Message from ColourMeAliix

hello

you deleted my page about my band which i was in the process of editing (my first article) could you please explain why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ColourMeAliix (talkcontribs) 22:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

do you have any idea how long that took... —Preceding unsigned comment added by ColourMeAliix (talkcontribs) 00:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

may i ask what these 'noteable requirements' are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ColourMeAliix (talkcontribs) 00:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i do say that those guidlines are ridiculous.. do you still have my article on file or has my work been for nothing.. just so you know its 1:29am were i am... ive been up for 2 hours working on this as its my first post ColourMeAliix (talk) 00:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Vanripertest

hello, my preofessor has been testing us on the credibility of wikipedia. He asked that we try and post bogus post and then delete them in a few days. Is there a way to do this without causing harm to the website itself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanripertest (talkcontribs) 01:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SO HOW DO I POST A PAGE ON THIS NOW FOR MY CLASS? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanripertest (talkcontribs) 02:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

his name is van riper and thats why he gave us the title —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanripertest (talkcontribs) 02:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semi or full protection?

Hi Gogo Dodo. Did you mean to do this? Two registered editors, Badkneesbear and SouthBuffaloRules, plus one IP editor, 80.195.95.86, have been engaged in a content dispute. I have successfully persuaded the two registered users to begin discussing matters on the talk page but the IP won't say a word, just keeps reverting. I hope to facilitate some sort of an agreement to clean up the article and source it properly, and I was rather pleased to have gotten the two registered editors talking. I think that full protection is overkill at this time and might be counterproductive. Could we try semi and see if things work out? Thanks. Rivertorch (talk) 06:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I would prefer to leave it as full protection. I think the full protection is best as it prevents either side from making any edits and having the perception that the anonymous IP is in the wrong since they are locked out of editing while the registered users are not. Full protection implies a neutral stand on who is right or who is wrong. I noticed that you have been trying to mediate the issue. I'm glad that have and wish you the best with it. Hopefully the issue will be resolved soon. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:47, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for replying so quickly. My thought was that the two registered users' willingness to use the talk page justified extending AGF a little further to them, but I'll trust your judgment. Hopefully some proposed text can be drafted on the talk page over the next week. Rivertorch (talk) 07:01, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is very encouraging that the two registered users are willing to talk while the IP is only willing to make snarky comments. But like I said, it is a perception thing. I don't want to allow either side to feel that they have the upper hand since one party is locked out. Or have one party feel like they are wrong because they got locked out. Or vice verse with one party feeling they are right because they can edit, while the other can't. Hopefully something can be worked out soon. If a consensus is reached and you need an admin to edit it or release the protection, feel free to drop me a note (I'm not watching the article or talk page). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My fault on the Bruce lee article

I think i need to update my browser. The strange numbers appeared only on the Chinese text.Goodman1145 (talk) 05:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck dude?

Why are you deleting my pages? They have nothing to do with you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by IWEWrestlingKev (talkcontribs)

Re: IWEWrestlingKev

I appreciate the heads up! WP:PW will be sure to keep an eye out for any future socks. Thank you. --UnquestionableTruth-- 06:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I was made aware of a similar sock a few months ago promoting the very site this past sock was promoting. I'll have to look through the archives for the name though. Thanks anyway. --UnquestionableTruth-- 06:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page Protection

Thank you for your recent revert of vandalism on the Dayton, Ohio article. This article has been a target of vandalism and silly edits of this kind for quite some time. I have listed the article for protection from such vandalism here Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. If there is any way that you may be able to help with watching the page for vandalism, or semi-protecting the article, that would be appriciated. Thanks. Texas141 (talk) 19:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]