User talk:TreasuryTag: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 08:02, 16 September 2010

Just to fix the formatting...

Picture of the day

William Howard Taft

Photograph credit: Pach Brothers; restored by Adam Cuerden

KnowIG

Look. You have also been harassing him as well. That is not to deny. I can find many cases. You were also banned for being in an edit war and you have been harassing him. I ask you to stop communication between the two of you and calm down. I am not blaming it all on him. I am looking at the reasoning given to me and analyzing it from there. It seems that many edits were provoked and he has not violated stalking at all. Please stop and do not talk to him on this matter. Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 22:41, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I'll take the above drivel piece by piece.

You have also been harassing him as well. That is not to deny. I can find many cases. – I suggest that you provide evidence of this, since you claim that you can, and since unfouned accusations of harassment are considered serious personal attacks.
You were also banned for being in an edit war... – I was not, and have never been, banned for anything. I shall expect you to retract this comment.
...and you have been harassing him. – See point (1).
...he has not violated stalking at all. – I never suggested that he was engaged in stalking. I said that when he accused me of stalking, that was untrue and thus a serious personal attack.
Please stop and do not talk to him on this matter. – I am sorry, but if you are not going to rebuke him for his personal attack in accusing me of stalking, and I guess that you will not as you made a similar attack just above, then I do not consider myself bound by your 'instructions'. ╟─Treasury Tag►most serene─╢ 07:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please could you explain how your proposal to ban me from interacting with KnowIG (thanks for notifying me of that, by the way) would in any way prevent edits such as these, in which I was not remotely involved: [1] [2] [3] [4] – I look forward to reading your explanation. ╟─Treasury Tag►Tellers' wands─╢ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
 :#{{!xt|...he has not violated stalking at all.}} – I never suggested that he was engaged in stalking. I said that when he accused me of stalking, that was untrue and thus [[WP:HA#NOT|a serious personal attack]].
 :#{{!xt|Please stop and do not talk to him on this matter.}} – I am sorry, but if you are not going to rebuke him for his personal attack in accusing me of stalking, and I guess that you will not as you made a similar attack just above, then I do not consider myself bound [[WP:OWN|by your 'instructions']]. <font color="#C4112F">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">most serene</span>]]─╢</font> 07:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
+Also, please could you explain how your proposal to ban me from interacting with KnowIG (thanks for notifying me of that, by the way) would in any way prevent edits such as these, in which I was not remotely involved: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elena_Baltacha&diff=prev&oldid=376291467] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2010_Farmers_Classic_%E2%80%93_Singles&diff=prev&oldid=375999554] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Snooker_season_2010/2011&diff=prev&oldid=378062781] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_tennis_venues&diff=prev&oldid=384029888] – I look forward to reading your explanation. <font color="#FFB911">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">Tellers' wands</span>]]─╢</font> 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)