Jump to content

Battle of Talikota: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
The Anomebot2 (talk | contribs)
Replacing geodata: {{coord missing|India}}
No edit summary
Line 44: Line 44:


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://www.explorehampiwithme.in Incredible India Hampi Guide]
* [http://www.hampionline.com/ Hampi - A Guide To History And Tourism]
* [http://www.hampionline.com/ Hampi - A Guide To History And Tourism]
* [http://www.india-forum.com/indian_history/The-post-Talikota-Struggle-074.html/ - The post-Talikota struggle]
* [http://www.india-forum.com/indian_history/The-post-Talikota-Struggle-074.html/ - The post-Talikota struggle]

Revision as of 08:28, 7 November 2010

Battle of Talikota
Part of Islamic invasion of India
DateJanuary 26, 1565
Location
Talikota in present day Karnataka
Result Decisive Deccan victory
Belligerents
The Vijayanagara Empire The Deccan Sultanates
Commanders and leaders
Aliya Rama Raya  Ali Adil Shah I
Ibrahim Quli Qutb Shah Wali
Hussain Nizam Shah I
Ali Barid
, Maharatta chief Raja Ghorpade
Strength
140,000 foot, 10,000 horse and over 100 War elephants[1] 80,000 foot, 30,000 horse and several dozen cannons[1]
Casualties and losses
1,00,000 including Rama Raya Unknown but moderate to heavy

The Battle of Talikota Kannada ತಾಳಿಕೋಟೆ(or Tellikota)(Telugu: తళ్ళికోట) (January 26, 1565), a watershed battle fought between the Vijayanagara Empire and the Deccan sultanates, resulted in a rout of Vijayanagara, and ended the last great Hindu kingdom in South India. Talikota is situated in northern Karnataka, about 80 km to the southeast of the city of Bijapur.

Prelude

The throne of the Vijayanagara Empire had passed from Achyuta Raya, upon his death, to Rama Raya, The Sultanates decided to unite and destroy the Hindu kingdom. Inter-family marriages between Sultans solved many of their internal conflicts and they finally united against the Vijayanagara empire, which was seen as the common enemy.

The battle

On January 26, 1565 the Deccan Sultanates of Ahmednagar, Bidar, Bijapur and Golconda, who had formed a grand alliance, met the Vijayanagara army at Talikota between two villages called Rakkasa and Tangadi, on the alluvial banks of the Krishna River, in present day Karnataka state. It was one of the few times in medieval Indian history that a joint strategy was employed. The sultanates were also aided by some minor Hindu kingdoms who held grudges against the Vijayanagara Empire. The Deccan kings had a grand total of 80,000 infantry and 30,000 cavalry. Vijayanagara, on the other hand, had 140,000 foot soldiers, with another 10,000 on horseback. The armies also had large numbers of war elephants. This decisive battle was fiercely fought. Fighting in a rocky terrain, the invading troops launched a classic offensive strategy. First they softened up the primary lines of the Vijayanagara army using cannon fire. The concentrated artillery took its toll, and the massive frontal attack by the combined armies finished the job. The battle ended in a complete victory for the sultanates, with the raja being beheaded and put on display as a trophy. What followed was pillage and the plunder of Vijayanagara. Only Imad shahi of Berar did not join in the battle.citation needed

Aftermath

The battle spelt the death knell for the large Hindu kingdoms in India, and it also ended the last great southern empire in India. What followed was a victorious army along with hordes of robbers and jungle dwellers falling upon the great city, looting, robbing, murdering and pillaging the residents. With axes, crowbars, fire and sword the victorious armies went about the task of bringing to rubble the city of Vijayanagara which never recovered from the onslaught. The highly diminished Vijayanagara empire now tried to stage an unsuccessful comeback with its capital at Penukonda. Tirumala however could not lay claim over Vijayanagara as local support was to make the younger brother of Aliya Rama Raya, also called Tirumala, the regent. It was another six years before Tirumala could claim regency over the former capital of Vijayanagara. During this time, anarchy had spread. Aliya Rama Rayas habit of nominating family relatives to key positions of the former kingdom instead of loyal officers became a reason for family feuds and rebellion. The Polygar (Palyagar) system (local chieftains) which had been so successful earlier was also a reason for break away factions. The Nayaks of Tamil speaking regions; Gingee, Madurai Nayaks and Tanjore Nayaks were flexing their freedom and in fact Tirumala Deva Raya had to tacitly accept the independence of these Nayakas in order to keep their friendship in an hour of impending invasions from Bijapur. Later, the Vijayanagara empire shifted capitals to Chandragiri and eventually to Vellore during which time the other feudatories, the Kingdom of Mysore, Nayakas of Keladi in Shimoga and Nayakas of Vellore also became independent. As a result of the Vijayanagara empire's collapse, the political system of the southern areas disintegrated. However, it left a residue of Telugu enclaves and local elites scattered over most of South India.[2] Kannada country lost its united identity for the coming four centuries, with the creation of smaller states such as the Kingdom of Mysore, Keladi Nayakas, Nayakas of Chitradurga, the latter two eventually merging with the Kingdom of Mysore.[3] For the Sultanates and Muslim rulers of the south, victory seemed temporary as they continued to engage in squabbling and fighting amongst themselves which ultimately resulted in their capitulation to the Mughals and later the British Empire. Some Kannada speaking regions became part of Hyderabad Karnataka ruled by the Nizam of Hyderabad and Bombay Presidency governed by Maratha chieftains all of whom came under the British umbrella.

Causes of defeat

Historians have debated over the cause of the defeat with much enthusiasm.[4] Apart from epigraphal analysis, historians also have at their disposal writings of European travellers to the kingdom around the time of the war.

  • It has been suggested that while the Vijayanagara armies had fewer number of cavalry on horseback and depended on commanders riding war elephants making them slower on battlefield, the Sultanate armies had many more swift Persian horses used by key sections of the army and commanders. This gave the them an edge.
  • It is also well known that all the three main commanders of the Vijayanagara army including Aliya Rama Raya were aging compared to the young commanders of the Sultanate armies.
  • While the Vijayanagara infantry depended on bows made of bamboo, the Sultanate armies used crossbows made of metal which were much more effective in accuracy and distance. Also, the Vijayanagara army used 7 feet (2.1 m) long spears and javelins while the Sultanate armies used 15 feet (4.6 m) long spears while riding horse back. This gave them a clear advantage.
  • The Sultanate armies had a much better prepared artillery division manned by mercenary gunners from Turkestan, who were at that time considered the best at artillery warfare while Vijayanagara depended on European mercenaries who were not as well trained.
  • In spite of all these disadvantages, historians agree that the biggest reason for the defeat was the betrayal by two key Vijayanagara Muslim commanders, the Gilani brothers who had thousands of soldiers under their command. These commanders were defectors from the Adil Shahi kingdom and later employed by Aliya Rama Raya. The Gilani brothers are known to have fled the battlefield at a key juncture. This has been strongly supported by the writings of two European travellers, Frendricci and Frenchman Anquetil Du Perron who visited Vijayanagar in 1567 C.E.[5]

References

Notes

  1. ^ a b India Today Collector's edition of History
  2. ^ Elite Formation in 19th Century South India - An Interpretative Analysis by Robert Eric Frykenberg
  3. ^ A Concise History of Karnataka, pp 171-172 by Dr. S.U. Kamath
  4. ^ A concise history of Karnataka, pp 170-173, Dr. S.U. Kamath.
  5. ^ The two Muslim generals each of whom were in charge of large armies fled the battlefield, History of South India, Prof. K.A.N. Sastri, pp 267 and Dr. S.U. Kamath, A Concise History of Karnataka, pp 172-73