User talk:PseudoSudo

Leave a new message

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, PseudoSudo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Thanks for catching the vandalism on Pork! (Even though it is delicious, and I quite miss it here in Israel.) If you ever have a question, feel free to leave a question on my talk page. Cheers! --Mgreenbe 17:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Question...

Any relation??? ;-) --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 01:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Oh, heavens no; the username is just a simple concatenation of pseudo and sudo, thought up on the spot when creating the wiki account (I am also not Josh Garrett) ~ PseudoSudo 02:57, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

I didn't figure as much, just thought it was funny. See you around. :-) --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 03:24, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

And then there's the Macintosh utility Pseudo, which is GUI frontend to sudo. archola 00:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

ProTest

Cheers for the help on the ProTest page. JohnFM 10:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Glad to be of assistance. ~ PseudoSudo 10:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Sandbox

Hey, way to recent changes patrol! Just so you know, there's no need to clean up the sandbox, there's a bot that does that. Unless of course you see something really offensive in there that's got to go. I hope my new sig. doesn't offend you! Welcome! Makemi 23:26, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I see. You were using it like a sandbox. I'm just going to be quiet now. Happy editing! Makemi 23:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Haha, was just testing out installation of godmode-light; previous tries on Opera just crashed, so I think as of five minutes ago I just made myself a Firefox convert. Though, yes, the sandbox is surely a safe place to make merciless reverts. Cheers! ~ PseudoSudo 23:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I was very happy to see that you reverted the harmul edits on one of my created pages (Clever waste of time). Keep up the good work! Kntrabssi 02:19, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

regarding your note at User talk:172.168.232.130

The anonymous edits were, in fact, user:catapult having lost its sign-in cookie. I assume this is due to database errors, as it does attempt to confirm, between edits, that it is still signed in. Just in case this does fail, however, I have chosen to include a link to my own username in the summaries of all edits the bot performs to avoid panic. See also the discussion at WP:AN. Regarding the hidden <!-- html comments --> I did have a reason for removing them. If the bot encounters <!-- {{test}} --> it replaces would otherwise change {{test}} to {{subst:test}}, and then change it again to {{subst:subst:test}} on subsequent runs. I would have programmed it to ignore anything that already starts with {{subst.*?... but {{subst}} itself is also a message template that should be subst'ed. Confusing you yet? — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 22:25, Feb. 13, 2006

I have thought further about this and decided to modify the behavior to change <!-- {{test}} --> to <!-- Template:Test --> for example. Let me know if you have any other suggestions. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 22:28, Feb. 13, 2006

Excellent; nope, sounds solid. ~ PseudoSudo 11:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Curling

That anon prick vandalizing Curling is starting to piss me off. Thanks for helping fend him off. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib)  –  February 20, 2006, 05:48 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd him listed a while ago on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism; just blocked. ~ PseudoSudo 05:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Post on User talk:24.79.43.137

Was Malcolm X not a pimp? Detroit Red? Perhaps you are confusing vandalism with your own personal preference? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.79.43.137 (talk • contribs) 05:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC).

I only hope you're joking. ~ PseudoSudo 05:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

The joke is on you, guy. Get reading. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.79.43.137 (talk • contribs) 06:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC).

Yeah; that makes no sense. ~ PseudoSudo 06:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

MALCOLM X was a PIMP... are you aware of that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.79.43.137 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC).

... ~ PseudoSudo 15:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

No comment at all? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.179.36.11 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 23 February 2006 (UTC).

Ann Coulter

No there has not been three reverts no I am not gaming the system and yes I have used discuss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.241.245.49 (talk • contribs) 08:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Please, count: that is four. The 3RR is taken quite seriously. If a consensus cannot be reached on the talk page towards changing the heading, it will stay. ~ PseudoSudo 08:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

read the edits, you will find yourself pleasantly surprised. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.241.245.49 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 20 February 2006 UTC.

Okay: firstly, 3RR states 'Do not revert any single page in whole or in part more than three times in 24 hours', so if you are arguing you are excluded from this by changing one word twice and then adding the same word twice rather than four strict reverts, it is invalid. Secondly, I don't care about the specifics in the first place; if it actually mattered to me at all I'd report it as an incident to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR, but you seem like you're making useful edits so I don't feel like you deserve being blocked. Just take a step back from the article; the point of the 3RR is simply to prevent revert wars. You're doing fine. ~ PseudoSudo 08:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm...

not sure what to say.

So I'll settle with saying thanks and leave the Coulter crap alone for 24 hours.

132.241.245.49 08:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for fixing the vandalism on my User page. Jayjg ^(talk) 09:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

*smile* -- don't worry about it; anytime. ~ PseudoSudo 14:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for fixing my user page. The user who vandalized my page is so immature. Va girl2468 21:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Main Page

Hi there. I reverted the changes you made to Talk:Main Page as it was obviously an accident. Were you trying to add that to your userpage? VegaDark 08:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Ah, precisely; just grabbed an arbitrary page for using 'Preview'; thanks on the catch. ~ PseudoSudo 08:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

For the revert.Mikereichold 09:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Good Luck...

dealing with Cryptic with the Pork (instant messenger). He seems more concerned about the number of edits he does rather on the quality of the work he puts in. At least he hasn't deleted the talk page yet. Binarypower 00:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)