User talk:Me ne frego: Difference between revisions
Me ne frego (talk | contribs) |
→Blocked: new section |
||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
::::This is wikipedia. It is best to have inline references to avoid aspersions from others of original research, another wikipedia no-no. [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 20:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
::::This is wikipedia. It is best to have inline references to avoid aspersions from others of original research, another wikipedia no-no. [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 20:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::::There can be no dispute. The rules are firmly given. Besides, the cities were chosen as model examples.--[[User:Me ne frego|Me ne frego]] ([[User talk:Me ne frego#top|talk]]) 21:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
:::::There can be no dispute. The rules are firmly given. Besides, the cities were chosen as model examples.--[[User:Me ne frego|Me ne frego]] ([[User talk:Me ne frego#top|talk]]) 21:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Blocked == |
|||
{{tmbox |
|||
| style = background: #f8eaba; |
|||
| image = [[Image:Sock block.svg|75px]] |
|||
| text = <big>'''Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet'''</big> |
|||
'''''You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' as a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppet]] of {{user19|Giornorosso}} that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], ''but'' using them for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]] reasons is '''not'''. |
|||
If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. <span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px"><b><font color="#4682B4">[[User:Elockid|Elockid]]</font></b></span> <sup>(<font color="#99BADD">[[User talk:Elockid|Talk]]</font>)</sup> 21:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock --> |
|||
}} |
Revision as of 21:28, 3 April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia!
|
Airplaneman ✈ 23:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bantu peoples with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Edit warring
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Uyghur people. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. rʨanaɢ (talk) 18:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
April 2011
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Uyghur people. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 14:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Mediterranean climate
I'm not going to get into a 3RR-within-24-hours war with you on Mediterranean climate. However, merely placing a section back in as a placeholder, as far as I can tell, is not sanctioned by wikipedia on any of its guidance pages, especially if that section can be construed to be a gallery. If I'm wrong here, post the wikilink on my talk page. My advice would be to place it as an extension of your userpage, if you need them for some reason. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- I don't need them, but I think it would be good to have some climate charts in the article to illustrate how it looks like, The problem is, that there is no place for them in the article because of the maps I added, so I placed the them in the Gallery.--Me ne frego (talk) 20:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to add two or three city tables back in, I'd be okay with that but only if you were able to find references which stated those locations were within the Mediterranean climate regime. That way, when more information is included, and we have room for them in the article, we can place them back onto the margins of the article as is preferred within any book or encyclopedia. If we're ever going to improve the climate articles, inline referencing is needed for all paragraphs and cities/locations included within the various climate regimes. Otherwise, the information can not, and should not, be there. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- You don't need references, you only have to check if it meets all criteria of Köppen climate classification for the given type of climate.--Me ne frego (talk) 20:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- This is wikipedia. It is best to have inline references to avoid aspersions from others of original research, another wikipedia no-no. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- There can be no dispute. The rules are firmly given. Besides, the cities were chosen as model examples.--Me ne frego (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- This is wikipedia. It is best to have inline references to avoid aspersions from others of original research, another wikipedia no-no. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- You don't need references, you only have to check if it meets all criteria of Köppen climate classification for the given type of climate.--Me ne frego (talk) 20:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to add two or three city tables back in, I'd be okay with that but only if you were able to find references which stated those locations were within the Mediterranean climate regime. That way, when more information is included, and we have room for them in the article, we can place them back onto the margins of the article as is preferred within any book or encyclopedia. If we're ever going to improve the climate articles, inline referencing is needed for all paragraphs and cities/locations included within the various climate regimes. Otherwise, the information can not, and should not, be there. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Blocked
![]() | Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Giornorosso (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 21:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |