Jump to content

User talk:Burhan Ahmed: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Copyright: new section
Line 185: Line 185:


== Medicalopedia ==
== Medicalopedia ==

Hi Burhan. Medicalopedia is not a reliable source for medical information on Wikipedia. Ideal sources for Wikipedia medical articles include reviews by experts in authoritative journals, textbooks, and national or international guidelines. See [[WP:MEDRS]]. Blogs are never OK. Please do not cite or link to Medicalopedia any more. --[[User:Anthonyhcole|Anthonyhcole]] ([[User talk:Anthonyhcole|talk]]) 12:29, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Burhan. Medicalopedia is not a reliable source for medical information on Wikipedia. Ideal sources for Wikipedia medical articles include reviews by experts in authoritative journals, textbooks, and national or international guidelines. See [[WP:MEDRS]]. Blogs are never OK. Please do not cite or link to Medicalopedia any more. --[[User:Anthonyhcole|Anthonyhcole]] ([[User talk:Anthonyhcole|talk]]) 12:29, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
:Yes we have sort of addressed this a number of times before.--[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 14:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
:Yes we have sort of addressed this a number of times before.--[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 14:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

== Copyright ==
Hi again. A number of the articles at Medicalopedia are copies of Wikipedia articles. It is OK to copy our articles but you must (a) cite the original Wikipedia article on your article page and (b) release your article under the same copyright license: presently your articles are covered by CC-BY-NC-SA, but this is more restrictive than CC-BY-SA or GFDL which cover all Wikipedia articles (mostly CC-BY-SA). There is a brief summary of the requirements [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Forking#Can_I_fork_individual_Wikipedia_articles.3F|here]], with links to more detailed information. It is important that you address these issues promptly. --[[User:Anthonyhcole|Anthonyhcole]] ([[User talk:Anthonyhcole|talk]]) 03:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:30, 3 December 2011

Speedy deletion declined: Janet Seidel

Hello Burhan Ahmed. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Janet Seidel, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 15:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Top Hat Stage School,

Hello Burhan Ahmed. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Top Hat Stage School,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 15:46, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Burhan Ahmed. You have new messages at Burhan Ahmed's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Are you insane or something man? This picture was snapped by me, uploaded by me and edited by me. Lagta hai kay hamaray colleghe say koi khas nafrat hai tumhain joo baar baar issi pay aa kar edit kertay hoo....well if yes, then fuck off man! this picture is not uploaded on college website, since it was hacked some six months ago, and still it is dead...and if you could help our page, then do it in right constructive way, rather to put EXCLAMATION marks on each and every thing while you know nothing about our college!

File:College Enterence.jpg

Please tell me why you put the speedy deletion tag on the article Rafhan Maize. Please tell me issue and help me improving it.--just feel it 12:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just Feel It (talkcontribs) [reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Saint-Yves (the elder)

Hello Burhan Ahmed. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Saint-Yves (the elder), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Nancy talk 14:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Trial of Binayak Sen

Hello Burhan Ahmed. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Trial of Binayak Sen, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to events. Thank you. Nancy talk 14:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Steven J. Force

Hello Burhan Ahmed. I am just letting you know that I deleted Steven J. Force, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Nancy talk 17:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Rahman Al-Sumait

He is Islamic preacher , and is a important man . Thank you. رائد حموده (talk) 14:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Brandon Huntley. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Only a sysop can remove it please donot remove the template in future! BurhanAhmed (talkcontribs) 02:11, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please point me to the policy that says only an admin can remove a sticky prod. In any case, stick prods only apply to unreferenced BLPs which this was not. I believe that as I have already objected to a prod tag, you cannot prod the article again. --Banana (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On further review, the article has been proded three times. --Banana (talk) 02:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed the two articles you nominated for deletion at Articles for Deletion. The articles that you nominated have been closed as a Speedy Keep as there is clear notability on the subjects. Before nominating other articles for deletion under The notability policy please read it first and feel free to ask me, or any other editor active with AFD, questions you may have. Dusti*poke* 03:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Janet Seidel and referenced text

You reverted my edits which had

  • added 3rd party references to a previously unreferenced BLP
  • consequently removed the BLP Prod notice asno longer appropriate as the biography is now referenced.

I've restored the referenced version of this BLP. I'm not sure of your rationale as you didn't use the Edit summary or article Talk page to explain, but if (for example) you're querying whether there should be an article on this person, it would really need to go to AfD as it is referenced and the Allmusic biography clearly contains assertions of Notability. AllyD (talk) 08:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Quaid passport burhan.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Quaid passport burhan.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Dear Burhan, Please help me in reviewing the articles. I am reviewer now since some days ago and i read the reviewing help but i don't understand that. I hope you will help me in making me a good reviewer and a good Wikipedian. I am waiting for your help. --just feel it (talk) 09:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you Brother, I hope tou will also help me in future.--just feel it (talk) 10:25, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attempting to have content removed from Wikipedia regarding other medical websites when you are involved with one of them may be viewed as a WP:COI. Thus I have reverted a number of your edits until proper discussion has occurred. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide refs to substantiate your accusations. Here is one substantiating mine [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Burhan I seem to have found an issue. The page on your website Medicalopaedia was deleted [2] and thus you wish the same for others. If we created another page called Online medical wiki encyclopedias less notability would be required for mentioning Medicalopaedia. Anyway sure we can find a compromise. BTW are the images on Medicalopaedia under a CC3.0 license? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
They are with the same license as on WikipediaBurhan Ahmed | Penny for your thoughts? 03:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How about the images? The copyright seems ambiguous?Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Which images look ambigous ? Give me the link! Burhan Ahmed | Penny for your thoughts? 03:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I am think of this page [3] not the wiki. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Come and join us here at Wikipedia

I have approached all the other Wiki Encyclopedia's in an effort to convince them to come join us here at Wikipedia. I will try the same for you. My argument is that rather than create a bunch of mediocre medical resources we could create one excellent one by not splitting up the limited number of volunteers. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:51, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again Vandalism on my user page Help me please

Dear Brother Burhan,

I am very disappointed due to this act of vandalism on my user page, after the help of User:JamesBWatsonyour who semi protected my user page I was very happy and satisfied that now I can write and edit Wikipedia articles but few days ago some one vandalized my user page again I want to report this user User:Sajjadhunzai to be deleted as he insulted me by typing given below comments on my main user page due to these comments few people in my social circle insulted me I was never encourage to write for Wikipedia but still i keep writing for Wiki but these comments honestly made me grief, I am too sad honestly therefore I would like to request with you to BLOCK this user because if he can leave these comments on my main user page he can do this with everyone and please Full protect my page please so I and Admins only can edit my user page because I love this place and I am Wikipedia addicted now he insulted and disrespect me with given below comments which he wrote on my user name kindly tell me IS it good?

below is the story of RETARDED PERSON, please join me in saying a BIG LOL :)))

THIS GUY NEEDS SOME SERIOUS HELP, HIS ENGLISH IS TOO HARD FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND, BUT GOOD SCRIPT TO MAKE ME LAUGH AFTER WORK

I will be very helpful to you if you help me to protect my own page which is my property and honestly help me in this major concern because it’s not only my insult but also insult of all wikipedians.

Yours Truly,

Wikipedian --Faizanalivarya (talk) 03:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011


Hi Burhan Ahmed,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Birth Place of Rajkumar

Hi Ahmed, Just want to Know Is this House is exist now or Is it used by someone In simple I want to Know the situation of This House. Plz Rply me.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.60.12.95 (talk) 10:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please point out the image of which you are talking about Thanks Burhan Ahmed | Penny for your thoughts? 10:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Burhan Ahmed! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The article Journal of Pakistan Medical Students has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New journal, no indication of notability, article creation premature. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is notable enough thats why I added the article. However, if you dont agree, we can incite a discussion among wikipedians, and lets see what they decide. I have expanded the article and given more references. If you still have issues, Kindly send me a message back. Burhan Ahmed | Penny for your thoughts? 07:07, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello Burhan Ahmed. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Journal of Pakistan Medical Students, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Crusio (talk) 09:14, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Although I am affiliated with them but I have used a NPoV, however, if you still think there are issues, kindly point them to me and i will make them correct.Burhan Ahmed | Penny for your thoughts? 07:08, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. JFW | T@lk 12:31, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated linking to one particular online source, with which you are personally involved, really is a form of spam. Please let me know if you have questions about this. JFW | T@lk 18:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Journal of Pakistan Medical Students

Hello, Burhan Ahmed, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Pakistan Medical Students whether the article Journal of Pakistan Medical Students should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Journal of Pakistan Medical Students, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Template:Z82 Guillaume2303 (talk) 06:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Medicalopedia

Hi Burhan. Medicalopedia is not a reliable source for medical information on Wikipedia. Ideal sources for Wikipedia medical articles include reviews by experts in authoritative journals, textbooks, and national or international guidelines. See WP:MEDRS. Blogs are never OK. Please do not cite or link to Medicalopedia any more. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 12:29, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes we have sort of addressed this a number of times before.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. A number of the articles at Medicalopedia are copies of Wikipedia articles. It is OK to copy our articles but you must (a) cite the original Wikipedia article on your article page and (b) release your article under the same copyright license: presently your articles are covered by CC-BY-NC-SA, but this is more restrictive than CC-BY-SA or GFDL which cover all Wikipedia articles (mostly CC-BY-SA). There is a brief summary of the requirements here, with links to more detailed information. It is important that you address these issues promptly. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 03:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]