User talk:Gogo Dodo: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:26, 28 January 2012

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.

When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:

Use a descriptive subject/headline.
If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.

Click here to leave me a message

If you are here to ask me why I deleted your article, please read the common reasons why I have deleted your article.

Archives

2006
April 2006 – June 2006 July 2006 – September 2006 October 2006 – December 2006

2007
January 2007 – March 2007 April 2007 – June 2007 July 2007 – September 2007 October 2007 – December 2007

2008
January 2008 – March 2008 April 2008 – June 2008 July 2008 – September 2008 October 2008 – December 2008

2009
January 2009 – March 2009 April 2009 – June 2009 July 2009 – September 2009 October 2009 – December 2009

2010
January 2010 – March 2010 April 2010 – June 2010 July 2010 – September 2010 October 2010 – December 2010

2011
January 2011 – March 2011 April 2011 – June 2011 July 2011 – September 2011 October 2011 – December 2011

2012
January 2012 – March 2012 April 2012 – June 2012 July 2012 – September 2012 October 2012 – December 2012

2013
January 2013 – March 2013 April 2013 – June 2013 July 2013 – September 2013 October 2013 – December 2013

2014
January 2014 – March 2014 April 2014 – June 2014 July 2014 – August 2014

2015
March 2015 April 2015 – June 2015 July 2015 – September 2015 October 2015 – December 2015

2016
March 2016 April 2016 – June 2016 July 2016 – September 2016 December 2016

2017
January 2017 – March 2017

2018
January 2018 – June 2018 July 2018 – September 2018 October 2018 – December 2018

2019
2019

2020
2020

2021
2021

2022
2022

2023
2023

Goodman-LeGrand House

This is a courtesy notice to you. I see by a notation that on Sept 23, 2011, you deleted a Talk Page for the Goodman-LeGrand House. As far as I can tell, you only deleted a talk page by that name. I have just today created the article for the Goodman-LeGrand House, so I have also created a talk page. If you have any questions, please let me know. Maile66 (talk) 19:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Input at Talk:Futurama (season 6) about Futurama (season 6) and List of Futurama episodes

I don't know your position on Futurama, but I do know you are an admin who frequently edits TV show articles. There is a discussion on whether Futurama episodes should be listed by the intended production order (which is also the broadcast order in many countries and is the order the DVDs use) or the US broadcast order (which the producers shun). The argument for the production order is that it is the true order that Futurama should be watched in (per the producers) and it is the only order consistent world-wide (as all the DVDs/BDs across the globe use this order). Pretty much all past discussions have had consensuses for using the production order; the last discussion was in September if I recall correctly. The argument for using the US broadcast order is that many casual American readers are confused that the order here does not match the order that IMDB and other sites use (though it should be noted that the pages do clearly state they do not use the broadcast order).

I was wondering if you could give your input on the discussion. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 19:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gerry Gogna

hi, Kindly create a article about Gerry Gogna (Author) for information go to Google and search him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robintiff (talk • contribs) 06:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not J Brito again...

Hi Gogo, could you consider salting this page due to the number of recreations. We had the same problem with its caps brother J BRITO. Or if its the same IP perhaps a block. Thanks Pol430 talk to me 23:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I salted J Brito‎ and handed out a few blocks after figuring out which seems to be the earliest account created. Hopefully that will put a stop to this nonsense. I don't know if they are all the same IP as I'm not a CheckUser, but it is likely the same person from the Dominican Republic making all of the edits. I wouldn't be surprised if it is the artist, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I had the privilege of viewing his Facebook page, I think the only 'reliable source' for his musical artistry was his imagination... Pol430 talk to me 23:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get a chance to edit in the info...

Hey Guy, you deleted the page I was creating before I got a chance to edit in all the info. I had the dudes name, birth place and all that jazz and I saved it so I could get the proper citations for his musical work and stuff.

I didn't really wanna say this but that was kind of a dick move on your part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdbleb (talk • contribs) 06:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on British Airways flight 2157 deletion

Thanks for your very helpful and most welcoming comments! I have now joined the Wikpedia Aviation project. BritAirman (talk) 14:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

talk on (non) article removed

A few days ago I made some corrections to various entries in the encyclopedia regarding a friend, Adam Recht. I noticed at that time that he did not have a page of his own, though he was mentioned on other pages (fewer now, as I was actually mostly removing incorrect references to him, though some still show if searching on his name). I did not start an article on him, as last time (many years ago now) I started an article on a much more famous friend, it was unceremoniously deleted on copyright grounds (despite my having permission, which I will clearly state on the discussion page in future). I did however start a talk page with some starting facts and references, in the hope that someone else might at least create a stub to which I could contribute. You deleted this, G8, however I would suggest that whilst it may have been appropriate to flag it for deletion, thus giving me the opportunity to attempt to justify my starting the discussion, to delete it outright was rather heavy handed and possibly not in keeping with the G8 note regarding "excludes any page that is useful to Wikipedia, and in particular deletion discussions that are not logged elsewhere".

I do not know where I should be suggesting an article be started, and anyone seeing his name on another page would at least have been able to see his IMDB page and personal website.

I write mainly because I have often found Wikipedia (rather than you personally) very frustrating and unwelcoming to anyone making all but small corrections (which I generally seem to get away with without a problem). Adagio67 (talk) 14:34, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your assistance and for clarification on the points I raised. Adagio67 (talk) 13:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Guidance

Hi Gogo Dodo,

Since I trust your judgement in these matters, I would like to ask for your advice as to my best course of action in this ANI. While I do not feel that I have done anything wrong, I would like to understand this matter from the standpoint of a highly experienced editor such as yourself. Thanks. Ebikeguy (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your response, and I hope you feel better soon. Ebikeguy (talk) 14:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

deleted talk page

A friend decided to start a talk page regarding the many news articles that appeared during both my political campaigns. The idea was to start engaging in some meaningful debates over these news articles. You deleted the page before we had a chance to get started. All you are doing is discouraging people from sharing ideas. You should be deleted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.134.196 (talk) 06:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I will ignore your personal attack for the moment. Since you did not identify which talk page you are referring to and I really don't want to go wading through the thousands of talk pages that I have deleted, I really can't comment specifically on why your talk page was deleted besides that it was likely an orphaned talk page. Are you notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia? Are you an elected international, national or sub-national office member? If you are just running a campaign to get elected, then you are probably not notable. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Samz K Bebruss

Why you are sending me such msgss. If editing is not allowed then say clearly.. Peoples know just a little about that personality i am inserting some more info,,, Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samz K Bebruss (talk • contribs) 17:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

piss

oh i see your mr deleted article, can you please get someone who is not such a robot to deal with me im carrying a hobby on a page nobody but you reads, your really creeping me out dude tracking on someone randomly... you scare me — Preceding unsigned comment added by M12PLAYOFFSIM (talk • contribs) 05:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:19, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My recent edits

Before I can be reported to the "vandalism-in-progress" page or something and then blocked, I would like to let you know that I am getting really pissed off at reverts of my edits mis-identified as vandalism. I am intending to be a good contributor to Wikipedia, and I don't want to get into any more trouble. I think there is some defect in the bot that keeps reverting my edits. Please look into the situation and get back to me on that one. 69.123.125.243 (talk) 23:09, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why you are asking me about this as I do not run the ClueBot NG anti-vandalism bot that you are having issues with and I have not had any previous interaction with you unless you have edited under a different IP address. You will have to ask the ClueBot NG operators why it thought your edit was vandalism. I recommend that you report a false positive at User:ClueBot NG/FalsePositives. Just a hint, but yelling and cursing at the operators like you did here is not likely to get things fixed. Instead, report it through the false positive reporting page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For helping me out, Im a bit of a newbie, I've reading wikipedia for years but only just decided to get involved and contribute to some of the things Im interested in/know about. Sorry for making an unnecessary page, I now know the correct procedure and have requested the page to be made rather than creating an unnecessary talk page. Cheers Smeowrend (talk) 11:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in

You might be interested in joining the Imposter Verification Team because of your contributions here

Whenaxis talk Join the Imposter Verification Team! 01:08, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message from 124.177.1.118

Excuse me sir, are you trolling me by deleting that article?

Best wishes. :{D>

DJE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.177.1.118 (talk) 06:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From your edit history and the deleted article, it was rightly deleted as a non-notable individual. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He will likely be offended by that, but ah well. No doubt he'll see it, hope that he hasn't been trolled and move on with his life as a "non-notable" individual. I guess, that is only non-notable by Wiki standards, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.177.1.118 (talk) 07:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for helping me get started! JerryFromGA (talk) 22:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

:(

Hey. I asked for you not to delete my Killer Parakeet page. Have you never had fun in your life? Thanks a lot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emzoid (talk • contribs) 17:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Townsend

Hi

Been updating information on gymnasts, notice that there had been an article about Sean Townsend, who was a World Champion artistic gymnast. Can I check why you deleted the page, before I think about creating one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brunettekoala (talk • contribs) 21:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sutro's :The Palace at Lands End - Documentary Film

I would like to add information about this important film about a San Francisco's Historical Landmark, Sutro Baths. I'm the filmmaker and copyright owner of the film. Twice I have written the film up and it has been deleted. I'm not trying to advertise the film, just add it to the historical information. The film has been seen by thousands since November of last year and is still being shown in theaters. What should I do from this point? Thanks, Tom Wyrsch - Garfield Lane Productions — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpw1705 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

deleted Worcester Islamic Library and Learning Centre (Will C) page

Hello.

I created a page to inform the public about a new centre opening in my local community. It has been deleted. Please could you explain to me what I need to do in order to get it back. It's my first ever article.

Many thanks --Ghulammubarikali (talk) 05:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was only doing what I thought was correct.

I was roaming the internet when I came across an article about a character dieing in a TV show so I checked this site. When I seen it was not here I added the information. I have recently been informed it was a hoax and I apologize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DerpyDiedSadNewsToday (talk • contribs) 06:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Boyd

Just wondering if you could reverse your deletion of the article (12 Jan version). There appears to be no copyright violation. —Dark 08:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same with the articles: Bruce Goodwin and Mark Okey. —Dark 08:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The user was banned for blatant copyright infringement. The article, prior to the deletion, had no such infringement and were stubs. There is no reason to delete it on the basis of G5, if there is no problem with the article. —Dark 09:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 10:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to deletion of Talk:Shay Carl

Did you read the page Talk:Shay Carl before you deleted it? --Aaron McHale (talk) 14:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:39, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Robinson

The edits I made to Nicole Robinsons info are facts. She has lost custody of her children for the reasons stated and I am in possession of the court documents stating so. I am unfortunately directly involved in this matter and am in close daily contact with one of the children. My reason for providing such an update is to educate and pass on information. Nicole has sent me countless telling me to take care of her child etc. I would gladly forward them if it would support anything here. The honest truth is -- is that Nicole has been declared an unfit mother by the State of New York-- I have this proof. Why is it not permissible to state facts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stripepin (talk • contribs) 23:59, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: One World Note

I want to ask you if it's ok to put a note on the page that One World contestant Leif Manson is the first little person to compete in Survivor history?--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 06:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	thanks for telling me that, I wasn't for sure if it was ok to do that. Cheyenne (talk) 19:11, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanx

thanx again. if ur wondering why i said thanx, check to see ur barnstar! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CKruserose (talk • contribs) 19:13, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Art

	THe ripple effect of kindness
	Thanx again. I read that ur a robot is that true? Cheyenne (talk) 19:32, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flying

Oh thats cool! What's it like to fly?--Cheyenne (talk) 19:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: One World

We are now waving our hands and saying "there's a source out there somewhere"? The Mark of the Beast (talk) 18:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:55, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your answer does not explain why you feel the information does not need to be sourced. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 18:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did bring it up on the Talk page, as the next step in the process which will lead to WP:3O. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Samuel Bass article

Just wanted to ask you to undelete the Samuel Bass article. He is of note because Deacon Bass, with his wife Anne, came to New England in Governor Winthrop's company, in 1630. I initially found the link to the article on the page about Walden in Essex, from whence he came. Thank you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saffron_Walden Saffron

http://books.google.com/books?id=IEoWAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA7&dq=samuel+bass+puritan&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Kw0bT_uzB-SiiQLlwK23CA&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=samuel%20bass%20puritan&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by Netnuevo (talk • contribs) 19:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking of External Link to Grammy's Kitchen

Good evening, I was very hopeful that I could gain an understanding of what I need to do to be able to submit my external link to my articles on the Grammy's Kitchen website. I understand that you feel this is for advertising purposes, but the website was created specifically for the purpose of teaching others tips and secrets relating to healthy cooking and eating. I found these articles on Wikipedia and thought that the articles on the website pertained to the discussion and content in the Wikipedia article. I enjoy cooking and would simply like the opportunity to share what I have learned. I would appreciate your assistance in how to add my link to this site, or the cooking site, as I do not want to be in violation of your rules or guidelines. Any assistance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apassion4cooking (talk • contribs) 04:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:48, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adolph Rupp Page

I saw your notice on my talk page. A bit of background... The situation has been ongoing for a few weeks now. A few weeks ago I went on the Adolph Rupp page to read the history of the coach. I was curious about his past and I did what I usually do to learn about something quickly, I checked his wikipedia page. When I read the page, I found it loaded with points that were not cited, extremely subjective, not in a neutral point of view and just generally slanted towards making the individual looks as good as possible. Many of the points that were cited were cited from a popular UK basketball blog. I began to make some smaller edits and removing content that was not acceptable to an encyclopedia. Every edit that I made was reverted immediately by the same user. I also attempted to add in a section about some serious violations of NCAA rules that happened when Adolph Rupp was the coach at UK. Essentially, UK basketball was the first school to receive any penalty from the NCAA for rules violations. I added what I thought was a fair and objective section on the event that I cited to a few unbiased sources on the web. My edits were again reverted by the user. He claimed that my edits were not factual and completely inaccurate. At this point I became frustrated and alerted another editor of this situation. This editor went through and made some changes to the page based on the same issues that I wrote about above, the article was not meeting academic standards at all. He was very helpful and neutral in his edits. However, the user who was reverting all these edits became angry and combative to the changes being made to the page. Eventually, we were able to reach consensus on a few points. However, this user kept changing the page even after we agreed on the edits to be made. He also added all the other sections back in that were not written in a neutral point of view. A few days ago, he made over 45 edits to the page. This user has a long history of making biased edits to UK basketball pages. He also has a long history of reverting any other edits to the pages that he personally disagrees with.

There are no other editors of the page to discuss this with. This guy is the only person and he reverts literally every edit I make. I am unsure as to how to resolve this issue. This user continues to add things in this article like "Rupp's overall philosophy to sports and basketball was that victory was paramount." When I tried to remove this to tell him that this is not up to wikipedia's standards, he reverts every time and tells me that "One of the things that peope said that made Rupp unique was his extreme love of victory. Once again, common historical knowledge with good sources." I don't know of a sports coach that didn't have an extreme love of victory. These types of changes don't belong on wikipedia. Leochews (talk) 02:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gogo Dodo, about the Adolph Rupp page.....

I am reverting edits on the Adolph Rupp page that I feel take away from the factual basis of the page. All the information I have provided on this page is done in good faith, researched, and listed with reliable sources. I have tried to use wording that is unbiased, and simply relay facts, backed up with verifiable research. An consensus between myself and a Administrator who watches and edits this page was reached weeks ago, and the all the information that both he and I added was researched extensively, with sources listed.

You should know that this page has to regularly protected from vandalism, and is often vandalized by unregistered users, and users creating multiple accounts for such a purpose.Jbfwildcat (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help with the revert warring issue. As you can see by my talk page, and archive as well, an issue has been had for the past couple weeks or so over neutrality on the article and I was unceremoniously thrown between the two to fix it. A lot of it is simply re-wording it to fix the neutrality, but one editor wants to keep it the way it is and the other wants to completely remove it. I'm about at wits' end with dealing with both of them and I've tried to remain impartial throughout the whole ordeal and make the article factual, but both are very stubborn in their ways to keep it how they like it. Hopefully the protection will give them a break and we can work something out. — Moe ε 05:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I browsed your talk page, but it was a little TL;DR on a topic that I'm not familiar with nor particularly interested in. Both of the editors should have been blocked, but I was feeling kind since they never issued the standard 3RR warning even though you had mentioned it couple of times to them. Good luck on working something out. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Music Radio Creative page

Hi Gogo Dodo,

We have recently attempted to update the details on the Wikipedia page relating to our company (Music Radio Creative Ltd) and the page was deleted (we were told that the details we try to inpu are untrue - for example the fact that company is based in the UK as supposed to US - well we are UK registered company so I am not sure what else is there to say!) As we are reputable UK based company we would like to hold a Wikipedia page with accurate details on there. How could we rectify the problem?

Look forward to your reply. Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belaizzy (talk • contribs) 13:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ilovethebeach.com

Godo Dodo

They deleted my page the ilovethebeach.com page remember the one we discussed? Well I fixed it up with your requirments and made something pretty good out of it and now they deleted it it again but this time they only deleted it from my user page as well. May you please help me get it back so I can work on it?

Paulmcanders (talk) 19:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thank you for your help. Also as for the licencing of the pictures if there is a picture about a living person which catory does it go under? I can't just put everything under public domain can I? for example this File:Iruth madoff.jpg which licencse will it go under? Also Tparis said it was ok to send page to my user page when do you think is the soonest I can get it?

Paulmcanders (talk) 06:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied twice on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now in my progress I have found this link : http://www.ilovethebeach.com/reviews.htm

As you can see it has very high ratings which proves it is 1# in it's field. We can find a lot of notability here.

Another thing I was talking to godo about was the fact the the site made a video with Victoria Beckham topless. Here is the news article :

http://exclusivo.terra.com.br/interna/0,,OI1312608-EI1118,00.html

It is in portuguese so you will have to translate it.

The orginal video was created by Ilovethebeach.com which are here:

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/321140/caught_on_the_topless_beach_victoria_beckham/

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x28a1q_caught-beach-victoria-beckham_sport

http://xxxbunker.com/victoria_beckham_topless

Please come back to me on your ideias also will Godo get this?

Paulmcanders (talk) 21:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also found this if it may help.It is in French :

http://sexo.paperblog.fr/872773/victoria-beckham-seins-nus/

Paulmcanders (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at this video it example some of the privacy laws I was talking about.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xnsed9_hdsb08055-360_sexy#rel-page-13

Paulmcanders (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)e[reply]

Delete account

Godo may you please teach me how I may be able to delete my wikipedia account?

Paulmcanders (talk) 03:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia accounts can't be deleted, both for attribution and technical reasons. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TPS! =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Godo Thanks for the help so far. I am having trouble with some of the pictures I uploaded may you please teach me how I my be able to upload pictures and not have them deledted for copyright? Also I still can't find my page from ilovethebeach.com I spoke to the guy you asked me too see but there is still no answer. May you please help me un blank it? Paulmcanders (talk) 02:30, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please Review User:Trigger.o.metry/Umbrella Media Worke

Dear editor, i have created an article and would like it to be reviewed by experts. Please review it and give feedback. Your suggestions are required to further improve the article. Thanks and regards, dex 11:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC)