User talk:Certified Gangsta

File:Jiang.jpg

Jiang=shame!!

Thanks for experimenting with the page Chinese on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Kusma (討論) 03:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop distorting information about Taiwanese opinion towards Chinese reunification. How "Chinese" Taiwan is is a delicate topic, and we are trying to apprach it with a neutral point of view. Also, your edits on Chinese can be understood as vandalism, so please stop. Thank you, Kusma (討論) 04:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove large chunks of text without explanation, in the edit summary and on the relevant talk page. Otherwise, your edits are automatically reverted as they are construed as vandalism, which can easily get you blocked.--Jiang 06:43, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I do not endorse the views presented by the man depicted on my user and talk pages. The NPOV rule only applies to articles, not user pages.--Jiang 07:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

(I was too slow in typing this, so my answer comes a bit late) I can understand your edits on Taiwan independence and am also not completely happy with the sentence you removed that basically said Powell was right and all Taiwanese parties miss the point, but I can also see why Jiang reverted them since you didn't really say why you removed them. It might be a good idea to discuss this issue on Talk:Taiwan independence. However, you should restore the image on Jiang's user page - it is not very polite to edit other people's userpages, and he is only displaying a well-known San Francisco Chinatown figure whose ultra-nationalism is so silly it is almost funny. You should assume good faith and not believe that these are Jiang's personal opinions. By the way, Jiang is an administrator and I am not. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 07:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't know about the factual accuracy of the section that you keep deleting (I am not an expert in international law; it would be a good thing to try to find verifiable sources on this matter). However, there are other ways to remove bias than outright deletion (I have just tried to remove bias by simply changing "unfortunately" to "however"). The article in general seems to be more or less balanced to me, giving all different views on the matter without favoring one over the other (that is what or neutral point of view policy is about). Kusma (討論) 14:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Administrators are human; we are bound to be biased in something in all our lives. The question is whether if our actions as editors and as administrators cause Wikipedia to be biased. I don't see any evidence that Jiang has done that. For example, I state on my own user page that I am against George W. Bush, but I don't think I've made any edits that caused Wikipedia to slant against Bush. --Nlu (talk) 07:50, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Jiang's Talk Page

I looked at Jiang's talk page as you asked of JzG. What exactly concerns you about it? Mike _{(T C)} 03:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Please sign your posts with ~~~~ so I know who wrote it. How exactly is it racist? Mike _{(T C)} 03:21, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

The picture is protesting an issue, I am unsure what issue. How is it different from shame italy and europe, and shame=jiang that are found on your pages? Mike _{(T C)} 07:02, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Taiwanese American

You edited somebody else's comment, totally reversing its meaning. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kusma (討論) 03:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Jiang

You probably know this already by now, but this kind of thing gets fastest replies if posted to the admin incidents board. Also, you need to sign comments with ~~~~. I'm guessing someone is already on the case, but I am going to have a look - I'm also removing the comment at the head of your talk page as being distinctly unhelpful. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 10:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Warning

You are not permitted to edit my user or user talk pages (except to post a comment in the appropriate format, not to delete anything). If you do so once more, you will be blocked. --Jiang 09:54, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Enough is enough. For your personal attacks and apparently unwillingness to learn Wikipedia regulations and follow them, you've been blocked from editing for 24 hours (which does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia). If you are willing to contribute positively, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Your prior edit on February 14 ([1]) clearly constituted personal attack (particularly in conjunction with the edit summary). That's why I blocked you. --Nlu (talk) 06:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. I don't want to reblock you, but I will if this continues. --Nlu (talk) 06:01, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

this ain't no personal attack son. i simply said why did u edit jiang's talk page?? what is wrong with you?? but like i said, y'all are full of crap (i ain't gonna cuss out on herre) so i'm outta dis site. oh and before i go, why did jzg edit my talk page and you edited jiang's talk page but i can't edit no one's talk page. jzg said my picture is unhelpful so he removed it and now tha image is lost, shouldn't he get a warning??

leavin wikipedia

i'm outta wikipedia. dis place is sad. nothin can be done and accomplished and da adminz themselves are biased so anyway i'm out. Peace

WP:3RR

You are in danger of violating the three revert rule on Chinese. If you revert again, you may be blocked for up to 24 hours at administrator discretion. FCYTravis 05:39, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:2_p.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2_p.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 17:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. --Nlu (talk) 04:09, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 1 week. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 04:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Response to Nlu's accusations on admin's noticeboard

I am forced to write my response on my talk page 'cause this is the only page I am allow to edit at the moment. First I want to deny that I have any connection with GrandCru. I do not know the guy and never have any interactions with him whatsoever. I got an account on wikipedia last month when I was using the website for a school project. I noticed some of the info in the articles are outdated or biased. Some users, including Kusma, admits there are flaws in some articles such as Taiwanese Independence and China. Anyway, I was able to reach compromise in those articles (see history in these articles for more details). However, I was extremely concerned with user Jiang (who was also very active in Taiwan-China articles) images on both his userpage and talkpage that says Taiwan=shame and writings that attack Taiwanese president. I was told by admin Nlu and admin Jiang that you can put any images you like on your user page and talk page as long as you don't personally endorse it. This rule troubles me greatly, for we are not allow to edit others' talk page and userpage according to Nlu. In response, I created an image title "jiang=shame" which was later removed by another user (see my talk page for more details). As some of you might know, other users also voiced their concerns regarding the images on Jiang's talk page (see Jiang's talk page for more details under the heading are you a administrator?) I questioned Nlu if i can upload a image disrespecting Muhammad or praising the Nazi party or Japanese soldiers during the Nanjing Massacre. Are they acceptable? Nlu interprets this as a personal attack and I was blocked. Due to this incident, I was both mad and disappointed toward wikipedia andd the actions of the admins, who sometimes can't adhere to NPOV. I announced on my talk page that I was leaving the site. I'm man enough to admit that when I first began to edit on wiki, some edits are biased and irrelevant. I sincerely apologized to those whom I offended. However, there is always a learning curve, as I began to learn the rules, I gradually know how to make useful edits (see contributions). Recently, I noticed a lot of articles about sports and NBA are outdated and player names' are misspelled. While I was editing, I noticed Nlu was once again disrespecting other user "PoolGuy" and I also read "Silensor" userpage which I found clearly reflects the thoughts of many wikipedians, so I put it on my userpage as well. When I told Nlu to treat PoolGuy, who apparently made his comments in good faith, with respect and dignity. He responds by removing by userpage, which he called trolling. Like I said, the userpage is not mine. I copied it from Silensor and it is more or less true. Nlu is the very person that told me I am not allow to edit others userpage and talkpage when I removed the image from Jiang's userpage but he is violating the rule himself. And he blocked me before I can send this case to arbitration and therefore shut down my voice in every pages except my talk page. I can't even revert my userpage. This block clearly is not justified. Throughout my time here, I was brutalized, discriminated against, and totally lost faith in the authority of wikipedia. Like i said, I am man enough to admit my errors at the very beginning and as you can see in my contributions, I been focusing my time on articles regarding sports and basketball. Hopefully, someone will look into this situation. And I did not attack Nlu so I don't know why I was blocked. Since I do make useful edits, I do not know why they want to block me indefinitely.--Freestyle.king 21:46, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Project

Oh man, sorry i didnt notice your comment. Definetely you can join as I see you already did. Thanks and real sorry for not responding. Tutmosis 03:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

arbitration

I'm filing an arbitration against Jiang and Nlu. Go to my talk page herre or the arbitration page to show your support. Provide evidences of bias and hostility if you have any. thankz--Freestyle.king 06:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Crip Shyt

What up cuz, mayne their ain't many cripz on thiz shyt (Mayne I'm tha only one I've seen) I dunno what you is, I suppose crip? But thiz tha white mans site, they always clownin' on my 'urge' ta vandalize thiz shyt, and all their hip hop shyt is fucked up so I gotta fix it, holla if ya need anything nigga. peace.

...Also do ya rap, cuz me and some of my niggaz do that rekord lable shyt, right now I'm working on a "Duets" mixtape with some of tha crew, Hit me up. Also Nlu is a dick don't worry bout him.

Nlu

Shyt, mayne I don't care that much bout slashin' Nlu, but he's been a dick so I've got ya back, they banned me agene for saying Nigger...

Image Tagging Image:6 p.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:6 p.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. --Syrthiss 03:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

user.nlu

I wasn't referring to Nlu there, I think he's a good editor. --Rory096 04:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

well...

sorry. I wish I could help you about Nlu, but I've given up on fighting against users (especially if they're admins). There's not much you can do, even if you get the support of a few. He may not be the perfect admin (actually, he's the opposite), but what can you do. Stop filing complaints, make a bunch of neutral edits, become an admin, and then deal with it. Right now, you have no power, and neither do I, so, my "help" wouldn't really do much. --Boris Malagurski ₪ 04:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Keeley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Keeley.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:58, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Nigga ya knoe I'm down,

Mayne I'm down if we ganna bust that bitch/nigga cuz he ain't shyt, so tell me what we ganna do, it's on you

Image copyright problem with Image:Hazell.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hazell.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Keeley Hazell

Please cease reverting the Keeley Hazell entry unless you take a look at your mistakes and fix them first. Crv1 03:28, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

request for unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Certified Gangsta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

First, this is a shared computer so blocking the IP will be unfair. Secondly, I admit my wrongdoing as simply ignorant and lack of understanding of wiki's regulations and I apologize to Nlu and others who are offended. I mean, I didn't know we are not allow to use multiple accounts. Still, anyone who is suspecting me to be fooling the wiki authorities are wrong. It is pretty apparent that N1u is an imitation of Nlu and Freestyle.king is using the same IP address. However, both of my accounts has done nothing abusive. About "N1u" the imitation editing Jiang's controversial images, I want to make it very clear that using "N1u" account is NOT intentional, I just forgot to logout (before I know the mere presence of multiple accounts by one person is against the rule), and I have no intention of blaming the editing on User:Nlu, for anyone smart enough can tell it is me, Freestyle.king, instead of Nlu. And according to User: JzG, removing something that is unhelpful on others talk page is legal. Even though creating a similar account is illegal, this account doesn't need to be block "indefinitely" since I do make useful edits and generally adhere to wikipedia rules after several blocks by Nlu earlier. An unblock of this account is respectfully requested on the basis that no violation of policy has occured to warrant the block.--Freestyle.king 03:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Keeley Hazell mistakes

1. "photo =" code still left on page. Should not be there.
2. Spelling/grammar mistakes in "Polls" section. (i.e. "The Sun Page 3 Favourite Page 3 Girl of All Time," should be "The Sun's Favourite Page 3 Girl of All Time")
3. Last pic is not from "Page 3 Calendar." It is from "3zine."
4. 3 Revert Rule. I have only formally reverted it once. You have reverted it many more times than 3. Crv1 03:52, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

thank you for the clarification.--Freestyle.king 04:46, 11 April 2006 (UTC)