Jump to content

Talk:Christmas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Esoglou (talk | contribs)
Line 90: Line 90:


Would it be OK to add Xmas to the nicknames section of the infobox? --[[User:HighKing|HighKing]] ([[User talk:HighKing|talk]]) 18:18, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Would it be OK to add Xmas to the nicknames section of the infobox? --[[User:HighKing|HighKing]] ([[User talk:HighKing|talk]]) 18:18, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I think "Xmas" is a shortened way of writing "Christmas", not a distinct a.k.a. name. [[User:Esoglou|Esoglou]] ([[User talk:Esoglou|talk]]) 20:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
:I think "Xmas" is a shortened way of writing "Christmas", not a distinct a.k.a. name. [[User:Esoglou|Esoglou]] ([[User talk:Esoglou|talk]]) 20:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
::For some, it's an informal shortened name. I realize sometimes it is frowned upon, but that doesn't make it invalid as a nickname. For example, [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/xmas most] [http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Xmas dictionaries] include the term and provide an explanation. --[[User:HighKing|HighKing]] ([[User talk:HighKing|talk]]) 21:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:38, 1 April 2012

Former featured articleChristmas is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 24, 2004Peer reviewReviewed
December 23, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
January 1, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
August 8, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 1, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
December 9, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
December 15, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 24, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former featured article

Christmas Non-Observance Text/Graphic Conflict for Japan

In the celebration section text, it says "Notable countries in which Christmas is not a formal public holiday include China, (excepting Hong Kong and Macao), Japan..." However, in the graphic to the left, Japan is gray, signaling that Christianity is a public holiday. Does this indicate a difference between "public holiday" and "formal public holiday"? Or should Japan be "not a public holiday but given observance"? Am I missing something else? Thank you to the authors of this comprehensive article. Robigus (talk) 08:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas may be observed in Japan in the same way as Hallowe'en, Saint Valentine's Day and the like are observed in various countries, but it is not a public holiday in Japan. Period. Esoglou (talk) 10:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like an biased article for Christmas by the Christians

I wanted to read about the ACTUAL history of Christmas which as I recall was NOT a Christian holiday but a Pagan one. Can we get some more honesty in this article please? Eric Saunders March 8, 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.190.60.1 (talk) 22:49, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you "recall" incorrectly; Christmas is in no way a pagan holiday. You might be referring to the fact that it was (arguably) placed on December 25 to intentionally absorb pagan festivals that were already occurring at that time, but that doesn't make it a pagan holiday. Many of the modern customs of Christmas do have origins in certain varying pagan traditions, because those festivals were absorbed into Christmas as Christianization was implemented across Europe. That is all already covered in the article. If you have reputable sources that Christmas is a "pagan holiday", please put them forward. — FoxCE (talkcontribs) 22:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well actually, I would say that "Christmas *was* in no way a pagan holiday". A significant part of the discussion that went on on this page until it was archived at the beginning of the year, was basically about the question of whether Christmas has become a pagan holiday. I totally agree that Christmas was originally a Christian holiday, deliberately linked to earlier pagan festivities, and that it has been so for centuries. However, even the Pope acknowledges nowadays that many people celebrate Christmas purely as a pagan holiday or he would not be complaining about it like he did in his Christmas speech. AlexFekken (talk) 11:20, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Noel

This article is simply a wiktionary-like entry on the French name for Christmas. It should be merged here, if not deleted outright (transwikied to wiktionary, perhaps). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 19:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I think a redirect to Noel (disambiguation) works nicely. — FoxCE (talkcontribs) 08:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Makes sense to redirect to dab page. Why have you tagged it as a page move after you had set it up for a redirect? It's not going to be moved anywhere so that template doesn't seem correct. --HighKing (talk) 11:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It was to have an administrator delete the Noel page so that Noel (disambiguation) could be moved to its place. It has now been done by an administrator, all is complete. — FoxCE (talkcontribs) 20:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Xmas in infobox

Would it be OK to add Xmas to the nicknames section of the infobox? --HighKing (talk) 18:18, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think "Xmas" is a shortened way of writing "Christmas", not a distinct a.k.a. name. Esoglou (talk) 20:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For some, it's an informal shortened name. I realize sometimes it is frowned upon, but that doesn't make it invalid as a nickname. For example, most dictionaries include the term and provide an explanation. --HighKing (talk) 21:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]