User talk:Courcelles: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:39, 20 April 2012

Courcelles is suffering from health issues. This may affect their ability to work on Wikipedia. Consequently, they may not be able to respond to talk-page messages or e-mails in a timely manner. Your patience is greatly appreciated.

NB: Im pretty much not here except to poke on and make the occasional edit, or handle a tiny bit of ArbCom business. Basically, looking at light *hurts* the vast majority of the time. I might be around soon, or I might not, basically, you'll get better service elsewhere for the time being. Courcelles 05:18, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120
121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130
131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150
151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

Mail

Hello, Courcelles. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Oversight Backlog

Hey, I filed an RFO request this morning and I haven't gotten a response yet. I think there might be a backlog at RFO. Could you take a look, please? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 21:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Yes, we're in a bit of a lull of activity - a couple of oversighters have had less time lately to handle requests. I've gone ahead and dealt with yours, Neutralhomer. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 21:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks FN, much appreciated. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 21:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nadine Coyle

Regarding your edit [1], see Talk:Nadine_Coyle#Nadine_Coyle_is_Irish and Talk:Nadine_Coyle#Irish (particularly my comment to the latter I just added). What do you think? Cheers, JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A basic idea of our category system is that an article should be in a parent category or a subcategory, not both. SO, the usual rules of category maintenance say that either Category:Irish female singers can stay, or Category:Female singers from Northern Ireland. If there's good reason to revert, well, go ahead, but that's how categories are apposed to work, articles are put as far down the tree in subcategories as they can be, and higher level categories are filled with articles that can go no further down, all the way back up to Category:Contents. Like I said, if there's good reason for an exception, so be it, but it looked like standard WP:OCAT maintenance to me. Courcelles 16:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:26, 20 April 2012 edit JoeSperrazza (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 16,945 edits →‎Nadine Coyle: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:39, 20 April 2012 edit undo Courcelles (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators 434,773 edits →‎Nadine Coyle: re Next edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Regarding your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nadine_Coyle&diff=488223391&oldid=488223120], see [[Talk:Nadine_Coyle#Nadine_Coyle_is_Irish]] and [[Talk:Nadine_Coyle#Irish]] (particularly my comment to the latter I just added). What do you think? Cheers, [[User:JoeSperrazza\|JoeSperrazza]] ([[User talk:JoeSperrazza\|talk]]) 15:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)		Regarding your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nadine_Coyle&diff=488223391&oldid=488223120], see [[Talk:Nadine_Coyle#Nadine_Coyle_is_Irish]] and [[Talk:Nadine_Coyle#Irish]] (particularly my comment to the latter I just added). What do you think? Cheers, [[User:JoeSperrazza\|JoeSperrazza]] ([[User talk:JoeSperrazza\|talk]]) 15:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
			:A basic idea of our category system is that an article should be in a parent category ''or'' a subcategory, not both. SO, the usual rules of category maintenance say that either [[:Category:Irish female singers]] can stay, or [[:Category:Female singers from Northern Ireland]]. If there's good reason to revert, well, go ahead, but that's how categories are apposed to work, articles are put as far down the tree in subcategories as they can be, and higher level categories are filled with articles that can go no further down, all the way back up to [[:Category:Contents]]. Like I said, if there's good reason for an exception, so be it, but it looked like standard [[WP:OCAT]] maintenance to me. [[User:Courcelles\|Courcelles]] 16:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)