User talk:Krimuk2.0

PLEASE TAKE NOTE:

I am editing here on Wikipedia only to improve film-related articles. I am not here to push my POV and engage in petty squabbles with editors who thrive on fighting with others! Certain users make Wikipedia a filthy environment to work in. Talk page messages from such editors will be deleted immediately! Thank you.

On Rani Mukerji

I feel the quote about her reflection on child education in India is not needed. Also, if possible, try to trim and change to non-quote prose the quotation on her preparation for acting in the artistry section.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey, thanks. You are right, I removed the quote on children's education. However, I have kept the quote on her preparation for acting as of now. If someone opposes it at the FAC, I'll remove it then. :) --smarojit ^HD 04:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Ya the quote in artistry section can be argued to be kept, that's why I said " if possible"! For whatever reason, I have a feeling that this article seems less attractive/less prepared than Balan. I have not been able to thoroughly read it though.--Dwaipayan (talk) 23:16, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Oh, why do you think so? :( --smarojit ^HD 06:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Difficult to answer! Probably the prose is less tight. Balan article was more easy to read, and, of course, shorter. This feeling is somewhat vague, and nothing specific needs to be done.--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:31, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

I found four dead links and marked them; please fix them fast. BollyJeff | talk 20:19, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Bollyjeff, I have replaced them. Interestingly, all of these links were working when I checked them last month! --smarojit ^HD 01:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey, do you know how to find the rest of that 80 iconic performances list? I would like to use it. BollyJeff | talk 02:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Sure, here you go: [1] Just type in "iconic" in the filter tab. --smarojit ^HD 02:26, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Got it. One of the ones I wanted is incorrect; I am going to use it anyway. BollyJeff | talk 02:50, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Why the new picture? It looks over processed, not good. Also, you said non-free in the edit summary, hopefully you meant free. BollyJeff | talk 13:21, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

You are right, I removed it. --smarojit ^HD 14:42, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For getting Rani Mukerji up to FA status!! An amazing achievement, and 3 FA articles in a week on Indian cinema is nothing short of brilliant!! May you continue to prosper and produce more featured articles on here!! Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 12:33, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much. This means a lot coming from you. :) :) --smarojit ^HD 12:39, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

• Good work, smarojit! Just checked out her article. WOW!! It's obvious that it's thoroughly researched and amazingly written. Keep up the fantastic work! :)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Yay.... for getting Rani Mukerji to featured status! Excellent job!! Dwaipayan (talk) 13:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Dwaipayan!! :) :) --smarojit ^HD 13:25, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

• Congrats. More than anything else, its nice to see how single-handedly you get your articles to FA. Very impressive I must say. :) - Vivvt (Talk) 02:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much Vivvt. :) :) --smarojit ^HD 02:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, excellent job! BollyJeff | talk 03:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Bollyjeff, especially for the review. --smarojit ^HD 03:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Jennifer Lawrence

Hi! I saw this. As you can see in the history of the page, I also tried to remove that section, but that user said it was vandalism. Shouldn't we remove those unnecessary details? Or maybe we should start a new section in the talk page. What do you think? Keivan.f^Talk 16:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey Keivan. Yes, those details are really unnecessary in the infobox. I see that he hasn't reverted your edit as yet. If he does, we need to start a discussion in the talk page. Cheers! :) --smarojit ^HD 03:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Dear Smarojit. He reverted my edits at last. He also said that he would report me because of an edit war. Anyway he is warned because of his reverting without any reason. Now, what do you think? Should we start a discussion in the talk page or perhaps we should continue to revert his edits? Keivan.f^Talk 06:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey, I see another editor has reverted his/her edit. But anyway, I have posted on the talk page. Please comment there. :) --smarojit ^HD 07:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

FA dates

I don't understand how it works. If you do not make a request then what date do you get, and how are you informed? BollyJeff | talk 04:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Bangui

Hi, can you review this one?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:06, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Userbox

Hey Smaro, take a look at these userboxes created by me:

Code	Result
{{User:Pleasant1623/The Shining}}	THE SHiNiNG"HEEERE'S JOHNNY!"	Usage
{{User:UBX/Kahaani}}	KHello Krimuk2.0, I am Bob Biswas. Do you have a minute?	Usage

What's your thoughts about it? Reply me in my talk page, and plus congrats on your Rani Mukerji FAC! Thanks, ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 16:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

And what about the Kahaani userbox? ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 11:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, anyway. And as always, keep up the good work! ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 12:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

GA for Bangui

Hi! Smarojit, Thank you very much for the quick review and passing of the article to GA. May I request you to leave message of approval of this GA on my talkpage. Incidentally, RedtigerXYZ and myself wrote some articles on films such as Sant Tukaram (film) , Hunterwali etc for the Centenary Celebrations of Hindi Films which were DYKs> Do you think it is worth taking Sant Tukaram (film) to GA upgrade? --Nvvchar. 14:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Unwanted interruption

I think yopu have done PHD in interfering. Did i interfared in Rani Mukerji praising her like Meryl streep even for her disaster film? So, please dont interfare with mine. Also, reverting my edit will never help. Watcgh my eye is on your every contribution. You will not be able to fancruft other favourite article. ITs too much. I thought we were okiay but, you will never learn. Reverting name wityh my name is an insult whiuch shows that yuopu want tio show that im just a joke. Dont reply on my talkj page.—Prashant 15:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Unwanted interruption

I think yopu have done PHD in interfering. Did i interfared in Rani Mukerji praising her like Meryl streep even for her disaster film? So, please dont interfare with mine. Also, reverting my edit will never help. Watch out my eye is on your every contribution. You will not be able to fancruft other favourite article. ITs too much. I thought we were okiay but, you will never learn. Reverting name wityh my name is an insult whiuch shows that yuopu want tio show that im just a joke. Dont reply on my talkj page.—Prashant 15:11, 1 August 2013 (UTC)