User talk:Ajaxfiore: Difference between revisions
→October 2013: response |
→October 2013: adding |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
== October 2013 == |
== October 2013 == |
||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for edit warring and [[WP:BLP]] issues at [[Casitas del Sur case]] and [[Jorge Erdely Graham]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 01:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for edit warring and [[WP:BLP]] issues at [[Casitas del Sur case]] and [[Jorge Erdely Graham]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 01:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
||
:Response: when your block expires, you are welcome to file a report in the appropriate forum.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 02:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
:Response: when your block expires, you are welcome to file a report in the appropriate forum. And you can be blocked for edit warring without breaching [[WP:3RR]].--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 02:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:17, 1 October 2013
This is Ajaxfiore's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Reviewer
Sorry for the previous misunderstanding.
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Jorge Erdely Graham was accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
APerson (talk!) 23:59, 8 September 2013 (UTC)DYK for Casitas del Sur case
On 13 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Casitas del Sur case, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in January 2009 the Mexican government rescued 126 minors from a shelter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Casitas del Sur case. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Janus U & Newport U
Hello Ajax. You set up this redirect for Janus_University to go to Newport University (California). But really the NU article has no verification that shows Janus as the successor. I recommend that you set up a new article for Janus University. You can compose the article and then just revise the redirect. (I think.) – S. Rich (talk) 23:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, I did not realize the Newport website is now offline. I will add a source shortly. Ajax F¡oretalk 23:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Warning re: edit warring and 3 edit rule
Hello. I was directed to warn you about edit warring and rule that states you cannot edit the same thing more than three times. I am sure you are aware of these policies, but I am doing my due diligence. Thanks.
AbuRuud (talk) 23:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion==
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. AbuRuud (talk) 23:51, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)- Response: when your block expires, you are welcome to file a report in the appropriate forum. And you can be blocked for edit warring without breaching WP:3RR.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)