Jump to content

User talk:Hertz1888: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 162: Line 162:


[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ElKevbo&diff=592700649&oldid=592261609] [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 22:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ElKevbo&diff=592700649&oldid=592261609] [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 22:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

== People who think they know everything... ==

...are very annoying to [[User_talk:EEng#John_Harvard_.28clergyman.29|those of us who do]]. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 06:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:23, 29 January 2014

/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6 /Archive 7

Welcome!

Hello Hertz1888! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Vanderdeckenξφ 10:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Thanks - Astronomical thought for the day

I'm going to quote this from Talk:Solar_radiation and use it in my physics class today:

“Astronomical numbers are so mind-boggling, it's hard to imagine how any human can handle them. Manipulate, yes—but truly grasp? And yet, as far as we know, human consciousness is the best resource the universe has for being aware of itself!” Hertz1888 04:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

By the way, I happened upon your comment after reading up on Ackermann’s function and Graham’s number, so pure math had me primed for this sentiment.

--Thanks! Dc3 (talk) 14:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]