Template:Did you know nominations/Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
2a ok
ping
Line 29: Line 29:
:::'''ALT2a''': ... that sex worker '''[[Charlotte Rose]]''' organised a protest in [[Parliament Square]] against '''[[Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014|a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos]]''', which included slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
:::'''ALT2a''': ... that sex worker '''[[Charlotte Rose]]''' organised a protest in [[Parliament Square]] against '''[[Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014|a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos]]''', which included slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
:::That said, the facesitting part was the most notable part of the protest. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 20:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
:::That said, the facesitting part was the most notable part of the protest. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 20:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Fine with me. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 05:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Fine with me. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 05:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC) (Very disappointed {{u|Martinevans123}} hasn't chimed in with something utterly filthy. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 16:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC))
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 16:58, 20 December 2014

Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014

  • Reviewed: Did you know nominations/Hans Krueger
  • Comment: Okay, I'm aware that we're typically squeamish about sex-related topics on the main page, but I honestly can't think of any reason not to add this; the key topic when discussing the regulations is censorship, not pornography in itself, and the article passes all of the normal criteria.

Created by Sceptre (talk). Self nominated at 04:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC).

  • Secondary comment: there's also the related article Charlotte Rose, which is about twenty days old and could provide the basis for a double hook; I've asked that article's creator, ISD (talk · contribs), if he'd like to contribute to the discussion. Sceptre (talk) 09:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Perhaps we should go with a hook that's less in-your-face:
ALT2... that a Parliament Square protest against a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos featured slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?

(It's in the Telegraph article.) EEng (talk) 22:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Martinevans123: I feel there's an opportunity here re urine and streaming, but the words just aren't flowing. Can you help out? (Nothing too ham-handed, please, and no yellow journalism etc.)

ALT2a: ... that sex worker Charlotte Rose organised a protest in Parliament Square against a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos, which included slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
That said, the facesitting part was the most notable part of the protest. Sceptre (talk) 20:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Fine with me. EEng (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC) (Very disappointed Martinevans123 hasn't chimed in with something utterly filthy. EEng (talk) 16:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC))