Template:Did you know nominations/Pearl Lady: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
you slay me |
No edit summary |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
::::'''ALT4''': ... that the '''[[Pearl Lady]]''' wasn't wearing pearls? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 11:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
::::'''ALT4''': ... that the '''[[Pearl Lady]]''' wasn't wearing pearls? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 11:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
||
:::::Another "killer" hook. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 12:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC) <small>P.S. I'm struggling to figure out how I can get [[Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Hartog_Jacob_Hamburger|this guy]] grilled on the witness stand. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 12:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)</small> |
:::::Another "killer" hook. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 12:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC) <small>P.S. I'm struggling to figure out how I can get [[Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Hartog_Jacob_Hamburger|this guy]] grilled on the witness stand. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 12:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)</small> |
||
::::::I feel that we should stay away from the jewelry part and stick with the identification. |
|||
:::::::'''ALT5''' …that ''''[[Pearl Lady]]'s body wasn't identified until 2014. --<font style="text-shadow:#BD33A4 0em 0em 0.5em,#FF007F -0.4em -0.4em 0.5em,#0247FE 0.3em 0.3em 0.4em">[[User:Gourami Watcher|'''''<span style="color:Blue-Violet;">Gourami</span><span style="color:Blue-Violet;">Watcher</span>''''']][[User talk:Gourami Watcher|<font color=black><sup>'''''(?)'''''</sup>]]</span></font> 13:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
{{clear}} |
||
*[[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]], [[User:Gourami Watcher|Gourami Watcher]] has three previous DYKs promoted to the main page; this is one of four current nominations. Two of them will need QPQs, but not necessarily this one if it is approved sooner. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
*[[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]], [[User:Gourami Watcher|Gourami Watcher]] has three previous DYKs promoted to the main page; this is one of four current nominations. Two of them will need QPQs, but not necessarily this one if it is approved sooner. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:30, 5 January 2015
DYK toolbox |
---|
Pearl Lady
- ... that Pearl Lady remained unidentified until 2014 after a fingerprint comparison?
Created by Gourami Watcher (talk). Self nominated at 03:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC).
- Nomination is on hold; article has been nominated for deletion. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Consensus was keep. Should we move further with the nomination?--GouramiWatcher(?) 01:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Full review needed now that article has survived AfD. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. If the nominator has already had 5 DYKs, a QPQ should be submitted. The hook could be hookier, however. How about:
- ALT1:
... that for eight years, a drowned woman was identified only by the pearl-like beads she wore around her neck?Yoninah (talk) 00:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- This seems a bit confusing. This DYK phrase makes it appear that her identity was discovered because of the pearls, when in fact, it was through fingerprints. Is there another hook that would work? --GouramiWatcher(?) 02:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that Pearl Lady was found in the Ohio River? @EEng: your creativity is needed here! Yoninah (talk) 11:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- I've found these missing-persons noms difficult, partly because I'm hesitant to make light given that there are likely living relatives somewhere. How about this:
- ALT3 ... that the Pearl Lady had no pearls?
- EEng (talk) 11:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- I like it. Let's see what the nominator thinks. Yoninah (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- To pursue the idea:
- ALT4: ... that the Pearl Lady wasn't wearing pearls? Yoninah (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Another "killer" hook. EEng (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC) P.S. I'm struggling to figure out how I can get this guy grilled on the witness stand. EEng (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- I feel that we should stay away from the jewelry part and stick with the identification.
- ALT5 …that 'Pearl Lady's body wasn't identified until 2014. --GouramiWatcher(?) 13:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- I feel that we should stay away from the jewelry part and stick with the identification.
- Another "killer" hook. EEng (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC) P.S. I'm struggling to figure out how I can get this guy grilled on the witness stand. EEng (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- ALT4: ... that the Pearl Lady wasn't wearing pearls? Yoninah (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yoninah, Gourami Watcher has three previous DYKs promoted to the main page; this is one of four current nominations. Two of them will need QPQs, but not necessarily this one if it is approved sooner. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)