Talk:2014 Crimean crisis: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:23, 10 March 2015

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 Crimean crisis redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 14 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

A news item involving 2014 Crimean crisis was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 March 2014.

Wikipedia

Russia Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine High‑importance

	Ukraine portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Crimea Task Force.

Military history: Russian & Soviet Start‑class

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance

	This redirect is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 Crimean crisis redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 14 days

Nuland's intercepted phone call

Anyone can go to youtube and listen to a US state dept official essentially hand pick Ukraine's next leader - strange for a purely native 'revolution' versus a US-backed coup.

Why no mention here or in other/related articles?

I'm not suggesting advocating some pro-Russian narrative, but suggesting not mentioning great evidence of US interference, or emphasizing the referendum and the fact it was a Ukrainian USSR premiere who, without consulting the Crimeans AT ALL, detached Crimea from Russia and to Ukraine....

A bona fide encyclopedic entry would be far more complete, and hence neutral. Everybody has biases - but the goal here ought to be a final product that is beyond reproach and an excellent and complete {as possible} source - jmo

50.252.249.155 (talk)mpk40 — Preceding undated comment added 19:54, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because pro-Ukraine, pro-Western-imperialism, and Russophobic editors have fought to keep out any facts that contradict their 'Ukraine-good, Russia-evil' fairy tale. This entry is an embarrassment to NPOV and Wikipedia. In addition to commenting here, please help edit into the main article a neutral point of view and all the relevant and important facts and RS-sourced allegations.Haberstr (talk) 03:23, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Statements not confirmed by sources

Currently a source is used to claim "opposition by Russia", while the source used clearly speaks about thousands of local protesters. While there is no doubt that stationed troops were later used by Russian Federation, that should not mean we can erase information about protesters which is confirmed by numerous reliable sources such as The Guardian or BBC. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 [[Special:Contributions/50.252.249.155|50.252.249.155]] ([[User talk:50.252.249.155|talk]])mpk40  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned"> — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 19:54, 3 March 2015 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+:Because pro-Ukraine, pro-Western-imperialism, and Russophobic editors have fought to keep out any facts that contradict their 'Ukraine-good, Russia-evil' fairy tale. This entry is an embarrassment to [[NPOV]] and Wikipedia. In addition to commenting here, please help edit into the main article a neutral point of view and all the relevant and important facts and RS-sourced allegations.[[User:Haberstr|Haberstr]] ([[User talk:Haberstr|talk]]) 03:23, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 == Statements not confirmed by sources ==