Jump to content

Appeal to ridicule: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Drant (talk | contribs)
Revert Vandalism Undid revision 640011455 by 74.83.123.23 (talk)
→‎References: External link
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 6: Line 6:
{{portal|Logic}}
{{portal|Logic}}
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

==External links==
* [https://logfall.wordpress.com/appeal-to-ridicule/ Logfall | Appeal to ridicule]: Logical fallacies site addressing the ''appeal to ridicule'' fallacy with examples.


{{Relevance fallacies}}
{{Relevance fallacies}}

Revision as of 07:17, 16 March 2015

Appeal to ridicule (also called appeal to mockery, ab absurdo, or the horse laugh[1]), is an informal fallacy which presents an opponent's argument as absurd, ridiculous, or in any way humorous, to the specific end of a foregone conclusion that the argument lacks any substance which would merit consideration.

Appeal to ridicule is often found in the form of comparing a nuanced circumstance or argument to a laughably commonplace occurrence or to some other irrelevancy on the basis of comedic timing, wordplay, or making an opponent and their argument the object of a joke. This is a rhetorical tactic that mocks an opponent's argument or standpoint, attempting to inspire an emotional reaction (making it a type of appeal to emotion) in the audience and to highlight any counter-intuitive aspects of that argument, making it appear foolish and contrary to common sense. This is typically done by making a mockery of the argument's foundation that represents it in an uncharitable and overly simplified way.

References

  1. ^ Brooke Noel Moore and Richard Parker, Critical Thinking, McGraw-Hill, 2000, p. 526.