Jump to content

Appeal to tradition: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverting changes by Michalduvie due to significant formatting errors
→‎References: External link
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 37: Line 37:
| accessdate=29 January 2014
| accessdate=29 January 2014
}}</cite>
}}</cite>

==External links==
* [https://logfall.wordpress.com/appeal-to-tradition/ Logfall | Appeal to tradition]: Logical fallacies site addressing the ''appeal to tradition'' fallacy with examples.


{{Relevance fallacies}}
{{Relevance fallacies}}

Revision as of 07:21, 16 March 2015

Appeal to tradition (also known as argumentum ad antiquitatem,[1] appeal to antiquity, or appeal to common practice) is a common fallacy in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis that it correlates with some past or present tradition. The appeal takes the form of "this is right because we've always done it this way."[2]

An appeal to tradition essentially makes two assumptions that are not necessarily true:

  • The old way of thinking was proven correct when introduced, i.e. since the old way of thinking was prevalent, it was necessarily correct.
    • In actuality this may be false—the tradition might be entirely based on incorrect grounds.
  • The past justifications for the tradition are still valid at present.
    • In actuality, the circumstances may have changed; this assumption may also therefore be untrue.

The opposite of an appeal to tradition is an appeal to novelty, claiming something is good because it is new.

See also

Notes

References

  • Trufant, William (1917). Argumentation and Debating. Houghton Mifflin company. Digitized May 9, 2007.